DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Examining the Relationship Among Restaurant Brand Relationship Quality, Attribution, and Emotional Response After Service Failure Experience

서비스 실패 경험 후 레스토랑 브랜드 품질, 귀인 및 감정반응 관계분석

  • Jang, Gi-Hwa (Dept. of Social Welfare, Kyonggi University) ;
  • Song, Soo-Ik (Dept. of Culinary Art, Daewon University College) ;
  • Oh, Sung-Cheon (Dept. of Pharmaceutical Quality Control, Daewon University College)
  • 장기화 (경기대학교 사회복지학과) ;
  • 송수익 (대원대학교 호텔조리계열) ;
  • 오성천 (대원대학교 제약품질관리과)
  • Received : 2018.10.19
  • Accepted : 2018.12.21
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to validate the failure attribution factors affecting emotional changes after a failed service by local restaurant users, and the relapse effects of the perceived failure of a customer's brand relationship. In this study, the implications of this study can be divided into the null theory and the homogenous theory, in which the study of the relationship between individual belief that influences the null theory and the post-gender emotional response is minimal. The independence of the crash response (angerous VS compassion) has been equally validated as building a belief-gathering-emotion three-step model. First, emotional BRQ (intimate and love) has a reduction effect on controllable geeks, and behavioral BRQ (relative existence) has an extended effect on controllable geeks. From a management perspective, restaurant managers should be less aware of the repeatability of a customer's service failure and call for customer sympathy. Integratedly, restaurant managers must control the customer's perception of service failure and restore the impact of the customer's BRQ on emotional reactions. A variety of service recovery measures should be established and the cerumen should be controlled. In addition, since BRQs have different effects on anger and sympathy (extended VS), different service failure recovery plans should be presented depending on the characteristics of the customer BRQ. For example, measures such as monetary compensation or fair dealing, emotional distribution to close and loving customers, and persuasion of reciprocal benefits to interdependent customers should be developed according to circumstances. This study explored the effectiveness of the geeks after a service failure and has limitations that do not take into account the various regulatory factors in the BRQ-return-Empression process. Thus, in further studies, the effects of adjusting service failure strength should be considered and a more complete model should be built.

본 연구의 목적은 국내 레스토랑 이용객의 서비스 실패 후 감정변화에 영향을 미치는 실패 귀인 요소, 그리고 고객의 브랜드 관계 품질이 서비스 실패 귀인 지각에 대한 환원효과를 검증하는 것이다. 본 연구의 시사점으로는 귀인이론은 귀인이론과 귀인적 이론으로 구분할 수 있는데 한 모형에서 귀인이론에 영향을 미치는 개인 신념과 귀인 후의 감정반응 간의 영향관계를 통합적으로 측정하는 연구는 미미하다. 신념(BRQ: Brand Relationship Quality)-귀인-감정 3단계 모형을 구축하고 충돌 감정 반응(분노VS동정)의 독립성을 같이 검증되었다. 먼저, 감성적BRQ(친밀감 및 사랑)은 통제가능성 귀인에 미치는 환원효과가 있는데 행동적BRQ(상호의존)은 통제가능성 귀인에 미치는 확대효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 관리적 관점에서 레스토랑 관리자는 고객의 서비스 실패의 반복 발생 가능성 지각을 낮추고 고객의 동정을 환기해야 한다. 통합적으로 레스토랑 관리자는 고객의 서비스 실패 귀인 지각을 잘 조절하고 고객의 BRQ이 감정반응에게의 영향효과를 환원시켜야 한다. 여러 가지의 서비스 회복 방안을 수립하고 귀인을 잘 조절해야 한다. 뿐만 아니라, BRQ은 각각 분노 및 동정에 다른 효과(확대VS환충)가 있기 때문에 고객 BRQ의 특성에 따라 다른 서비스 실패 회복 방안을 제시해야 한다. 예를 들면, 이성적 BRQ 고객에게 금전 보상이나 공정성 거래, 친밀감 및 사랑 고객에게 감정배려, 상호의존 고객에게 호혜성 설득 등 방안을 상황에 맞게 개발해야 한다. 본 연구는 서비스 실패 후 귀인의 매개효과를 탐색적으로 검증하였는데 BRQ-귀인-감정 과정에서의 여러 가지 조절요인을 고려하지 않는 한계점이 있다. 따라서 추후의 연구에서 서비스 실패 강도의 조절효과를 고려해야 하고 더 완전한 모형을 구축해야 한다.

Keywords

HGOHBI_2018_v35n4_1120_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Hypothesis test results.

Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Survey Samples

HGOHBI_2018_v35n4_1120_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Exploring Factors and Reliability Analysis of BRQ

HGOHBI_2018_v35n4_1120_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. A Study on the Investigating Factors and Reliability Analysis of the Grown and Emotional Responses

HGOHBI_2018_v35n4_1120_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Verification result of confirmed factor analysis

HGOHBI_2018_v35n4_1120_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Confirmed factor analysis results (standardization coefficient)

HGOHBI_2018_v35n4_1120_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Correlation and AVE

HGOHBI_2018_v35n4_1120_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Model adequacy test results

HGOHBI_2018_v35n4_1120_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Summary of hypothesis verification

HGOHBI_2018_v35n4_1120_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Commencement test

HGOHBI_2018_v35n4_1120_t0009.png 이미지

References

  1. S. Fournier, "Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research". Journal of consumer research, Vol.24, No.4 pp.343-353, (1998). https://doi.org/10.1086/209515
  2. D. Xie, "Effects of Brand Relationship Quality on Responses to Service Failure of Hotel Consumers". The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, (2012).
  3. S. W. Kelley and M. A. Davis, "Antecedents to customer expectations for service recovery". Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.22, No.1, (1994).
  4. B. Weiner, S. Graham and C. Chandler, Pity, "Anger and Guilt An Attributional Analysis". Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol.8, No.2 pp.226-232, (1982). https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167282082007
  5. T. N. Bradbury and F. D. Fincham, "Attributions in marriage: review and critique". Psychological bulletin, Vol.107, No.1 p.3, (1990). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.3
  6. J. L. Aaker, "Dimensions of brand personality". Journal of marketing research, p.347-356, (1997).
  7. J. L. Aaker, S. Fournier and S. A. Brasel, "Charting the development of consumer brand relationships". Graduate School of Business, Stanford University (2001).
  8. C. Gronroos, "Service quality: the six criteria of good perceived service". Review of business, Vol.9, No.3 p.10, (1988).
  9. M. Blackston, "Beyond brand personality: building brand relationships. Brand equity and advertising: Advertising's role in building strong brands", p.113-124, (1993).
  10. S. R. Swanson and M. K. Hsu, "The effect of recovery locus attributions and service failure severity on word-of-mouth and repurchase behaviors in the hospitality industry". Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, Vol.35, No.4 pp.511-529, (1999).
  11. J. R. McColl-Kennedy and A. K. Smith, "Customer emotions in service failure and recovery encounters". In Zerbe, W.j., Ashkanasy, N.M. & Hartel, C.(Ed), Research on Emotion in Organizations: Individual and Organizational Perspectives on Emotion Management and Display. Oxford, UK Elsevier, p.237-268, (2006).
  12. S. Erevelles, "The role of affect in marketing".Journal of Business Research, Vol.42, No.3 pp.199-215, (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(97)00118-5
  13. R. P. Bagozzi, M. Gopinath and P. U. Nyer, "The role of emotions in marketing". Journal of the academy of marketing science, Vol.27, No.2 pp.184-206, (1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070399272005
  14. J. A. Russell, "A circumplex model of affect". Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol.39, No.6 pp.33-44, (1980).
  15. R. L. Oliver, "Whence consumer loyalty?". The Journal of Marketing, p.33-44, (1999).
  16. D. Xie, "Effects of Brand Relationship Quality on Response to Service Failure of Hotel Consumers". The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (2011).