DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Another Assessment of Fat Degeneration of Retracted Supraspinatus Muscle

  • Jeong, Yeon-Seok (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yum, Jae-Kwang (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Sang-Yoon (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2018.08.27
  • Accepted : 2018.10.09
  • Published : 2018.12.01

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the relevance of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation by occupation ratio (OR) at maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle. Methods: Patients from the Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital who received rotator cuff repair and underwent pre- and postoperative MRI were selected as subjects of this study. On T1-weighted MRIs, OR of fat and muscle at Y-shaped view, OR at a location on supraspinatus muscle where its diameter was maximum on coronal view, and pre- and postoperative Goutallier Classification and changes in the tangent sign were measured. Statistical significance of postoperative OR was assessed regarding time from symptom onset to surgery, size of rotator cuff tear, preoperative OR, and the difference between ORs measured at maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle and Y-shaped view. Results: Preoperative OR at Y-shaped view was $52.28{\pm}8.57$ (32.5-65.3). Preoperative OR difference between maximum diameter and Y-shaped view was $13.76{\pm}10.51$ (2.38-42.04), and Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.604 (p=0.001). Postoperative OR at Y-shaped view was $63.77{\pm}9.35$ (37.3-76.1). Pearson correlation coefficient of pre- and postoperative Goutallier Classification was -0.579 (p=0.002) and Pearson correlation coefficient of the postoperative difference between ORs measured at maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle and Y-shaped view was -0.386 (p=0.047). Conclusions: Fatty degeneration of supraspinatus muscle in rotator cuff tear patients should be evaluated not only in the conventional Y-shaped view, but also at location of maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle to establish patients' therapeutic plan.

Keywords

GJGJB6_2018_v21n4_200_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of rotator cuff tear. (A) Preoperative MRI shows atrophy of supraspinatus muscle; grade I by the modified tangent (indicated by a dashed line) sign. (B) Preoperative MRI shows atrophy of supraspinatus muscle; grade II by the modified tangent (indicated by a dashed line) sign. (C) Preoperative MRI shows atrophy of supraspinatus muscle; grade III by the modified tangent (indicated by a dashed line) sign.

GJGJB6_2018_v21n4_200_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Measurements of pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imagings (MRIs). (A) Coronal section of preoperative patient’s shoulder MRI. (B) Sagittal section of supraspinatus muscle, Y-shaped view cut from line b in panel A. Outer dash-lined area includes muscle and fat tissue. Inner dot-line is margin of muscle tissue. (C) Sagittal section of supraspinatus muscle, Y-shaped view cut from line c in panel A, at the location of maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle. Outer dash-lined area includes muscle and fat tissue. Inner dot-line is margin of muscle tissue.

GJGJB6_2018_v21n4_200_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a 61-year-old male patient with rotator cuff tear. (A) Sagittal view of preoperative T1-weighted MRI at location of maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle measured from coronal section of shoulder MRI. (B) Sagittal view of preoperative T1-weighted MRI of supraspinatus muscle, Y-shaped view in coronal section of shoulder MRI. (C) Sagittal view of postoperative T1-weighted MRI of supraspinatus muscle, Y-shaped view in coronal section of shoulder MRI.

GJGJB6_2018_v21n4_200_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a 51-year-old male patient with rotator cuff tear. (A) Sagittal view of preoperative T1-weighted MRI at location of maximum diameter of supraspinatus muscle measured from coronal section of shoulder MRI. (B) Sagittal view of preoperative T1-weighted MRI of supraspinatus muscle, Y-shaped view in coronal section of shoulder MRI. (C) Sagittal view of postoperative T1-weighted MRI of supraspinatus muscle, Y-shaped view in coronal section of shoulder MRI.

GJGJB6_2018_v21n4_200_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of rotator cuff tear patients. Preoperative MRI shows degrees of fat degeneration in supraspinatus muscle; grade I by Goutallier sign (A), grade II by Goutallier sign (B), grade III by Goutallier sign (C).

Table 1. Demographic

GJGJB6_2018_v21n4_200_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Result of Measurements

GJGJB6_2018_v21n4_200_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Pearson Correlation Coefficient (p-Value)

GJGJB6_2018_v21n4_200_t0003.png 이미지

References

  1. Iannotti JP. Full-thickness rotator cuff tears: factors affecting surgical outcome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1994;2(2):87-95. https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-199403000-00002
  2. Hamano N, Yamamoto A, Shitara H, et al. Does successful rotator cuff repair improve muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff? A retrospective magnetic resonance imaging study performed shortly after surgery as a reference. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(6):967-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.10.016
  3. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;(304):78-83.
  4. Gladstone JN, Bishop JY, Lo IK, Flatow EL. Fatty infiltration and atrophy of the rotator cuff do not improve after rotator cuff repair and correlate with poor functional outcome. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(5):719-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506297539
  5. Thomazeau H, Rolland Y, Lucas C, Duval JM, Langlais F. Atrophy of the supraspinatus belly. Assessment by MRI in 55 patients with rotator cuff pathology. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996; 67(3):264-8. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679608994685
  6. Liem D, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P, Habermeyer P. Magnetic resonance imaging of arthroscopic supraspinatus tendon repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(8):1770-6. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00749
  7. Shen PH, Lien SB, Shen HC, Lee CH, Wu SS, Lin LC. Longterm functional outcomes after repair of rotator cuff tears correlated with atrophy of the supraspinatus muscles on magnetic resonance images. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(1 Suppl): 1S-7S. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.014
  8. Jo CH, Shin JS. Changes in appearance of fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy of rotator cuff muscles on magnetic resonance imaging after rotator cuff repair: establishing new time-zero traits. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(3):449-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.10.006
  9. Vidt ME, Santago AC 2nd, Tuohy CJ, et al. Assessments of fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy from a single magnetic resonance image slice are not predictive of 3-dimensional measurements. Arthroscopy. 2016;32(1):128-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2015.06.035
  10. Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Hoppeler H, Meyer DC. Correlation of atrophy and fatty infiltration on strength and integrity of rotator cuff repairs: a study in thirteen patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(6):691-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2007.02.122
  11. Yamaguchi H, Suenaga N, Oizumi N, Hosokawa Y, Kanaya F. Will preoperative atrophy and fatty degeneration of the shoulder muscles improve after rotator cuff repair in patients with massive rotator cuff tears? Adv Orthop. 2012;2012:195876.
  12. Chung SW, Kim SH, Tae SK, Yoon JP, Choi JA, Oh JH. Is the supraspinatus muscle atrophy truly irreversible after surgical repair of rotator cuff tears? Clin Orthop Surg. 2013;5(1):55-65. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2013.5.1.55
  13. Deniz G, Kose O, Tugay A, Guler F, Turan A. Fatty degeneration and atrophy of the rotator cuff muscles after arthroscopic repair: does it improve, halt or deteriorate? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(7):985-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2009-5
  14. Gerber C, Meyer DC, Schneeberger AG, Hoppeler H, von Rechenberg B. Effect of tendon release and delayed repair on the structure of the muscles of the rotator cuff: an experimental study in sheep. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(9):1973-82. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200409000-00016
  15. Fuchs B, Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J, Gerber C. Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8(6):599-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90097-6
  16. Fukuta S, Tsutsui T, Amari R, Wada K, Sairyo K. Tendon retraction with rotator cuff tear causes a decrease in cross-sectional area of the supraspinatus muscle on magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016;25(7):1069-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.008
  17. Zanetti M, Gerber C, Hodler J. Quantitative assessment of the muscles of the rotator cuff with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 1998;33(3):163-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199803000-00006
  18. Kuzel BR, Grindel S, Papandrea R, Ziegler D. Fatty infiltration and rotator cuff atrophy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013; 21(10):613-23. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-21-10-613
  19. Warner JJ, Higgins L, Parsons IM 4th, Dowdy P. Diagnosis and treatment of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10(1):37-46. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2001.112022