References
- 김중현.여형석.박영택(2017). 트리즈 도구별 활용도 분석: S사의 적용사례를 중심으로. 공학교육연구, 20(4), 3-11.
- 김효준(2004). 생각의 창의성 TRIZ :Theory of Inventive Problem Solving. 서울: 지혜.
- 박강 외(2005). 창의공학: 공학 문제 해결의 길잡이. 인터비전.
- 박선영, 박현우, 조만형 2006. 특허분석을 통한 기술혁신과 기업성과의 관계분석. 기술혁신학회지, 9(1), 1-25.
- 박영택(2016). 창의발상론. 서울: 한국표준협회미디어.
- 박정규.허은녕(2010). 가산자료 회귀모형을 활용한 연료전지 및 태양전지 분야 특허의 질적 수준 결정요인 분석. 기술혁신학회지, 13, 365-378.
- 신승후.현병환(2008). 특허 및 논문분석을 이용한 연구생산성 분석 기법에 관한 연구. 기술혁신학회지, 11, 400-429.
- 안연식(2010). 기업의 특허 역량이 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증 분석: 우수 벤처기업을 중심으로. 지식경영연구, 11(1), 83-96.
- 유경동(2018). 유경동의 특허토커, 조선IT, http://it.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2018/04/12/2018041285030.html/ (4 Oct 2018).
- 이용규.이경원(2003). 트리즈 (러시아의 창의적 문제해결 이론)의 창의적 지식경영에서의 응용, 지식경영연구 4(1), 79-92.
- 이원영, 박용태, 윤병운, 신준석, 최창우, 한유진, 김은희(2005). 특허 데이터베이스를 활용한 기술-산업간 연계구조 분석과 한국기업의 특허전략 평가. 과학기술정책연구원.
- 임철일, 홍미영, 이선희(2011). 공학교육에서의 창의성 증진을 위한 학습환경 설계모형. 교육공학연구, 14(4), 3-10.
- 정찬식(2015). 특허(등록)료로 보는 기업의 특허관리 현황. 지식재산정책, 22, 174-179.
- 하정출(2005). 지식경영론, 서울:두남
- Albert, M. B. and Narin, F. and McAllister, P. and Avery, D. (1991). Direct Validation of Citation Counts as Indicators of Industrially Important Patents. Research Policy, 20 (3), 251-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90055-U
- Allison, J.R., Lemley, M.A., Moore, K.A. and Trunkey, R.D.(2003). Valuable patents. Georgetown Law Journal, 92, 435-480.
- Altshuller, G. S.(1984). Creativity as an Exact Science: The Theory of Solution of Inventive Problems. New York: Gordon and Breach.
- Altshuller, G. S.(2007). The Innovation Algorithm: TRIZ, Systematic Innovation and Technical Creativity. Worcester: Technical Innovation Center.
- Archibugi, D. and Pianta, M.(1996). Measuring Technological Change through Patents and Innovation Surveys, Technovation, 16 (9), 451-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(96)00031-4
- Arundel, A. and Kabla, I.(1998). What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms. Research policy, 27 (2), 127-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00033-X
- Bessen, J.(2008). The value of US patents by owner and patent characteristics. Research Policy, 37 (5), 932-945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.005
- Borgianni, Y. and Matt, D. T.(2016). Applications of TRIZ and axiomatic design: a comparison to deduce best practices in industry. Procedia CIRP, 39, 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.171
- Brouwer, E. and Kleinknecht A.(1989) Innovative Output, and a Firm's Propensity to Patent:An Exploration of CIS Micro Data. Research Policy, 28 (6), 615-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00003-7
- Cohen, J.(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, Hillsdale, N.J. : L. Erlbaum Associates.
- Drucker, P. F.(1999). Management Challenges for the 21st Century. New York : HarperBusiness.
- Goldenberg, J., Mazursky, D.(2002). Creativity in product innovation. Cambridge University Press.
- Griliches, Z. 1991. The search for R&D spillovers (No.w3768), National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Harhoff, D. and Narin, F. and Scherer, F. M. and Vopel, K. (1999). Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81 (3), 511-515 https://doi.org/10.1162/003465399558265
- Ilevbare, I. M., Probert, D., & Phaal, R.(2013). A review of TRIZ, and its benefits and challenges in practice. Technovation, 33 (2-3), 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.003
- Karki, M. M. S.(1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information 19 (4), 269-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0172-2190(97)00033-1
- LENS, https://www.lens.org/ (16 Feb 2018)
- Moehrle, M.G.(2005). How Combinations of TRIZ Tools Are Used in Companies - Results of a Cluster Analysis, R&D Management, 35 (3), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00390.x
- nARCHITECTS, http://narchitects.com/ (16 Nov 2018)
- Narin, F., Noma, E., & Perry, R.(1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy, 16 (2-4), 143-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(87)90028-X
- Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A.(1959). The Processes of Creative Thinking. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
- NSF (National Science Foundation, USA) 2018. Science & Engineering Indicators 2018, National Science Board.
- Oakley, http://www.oakley.co.kr/ (16 Nov 2018)
- Shaughnessy, H.(2013). "What Makes Samsung Such An Innovative Company?," Fobes Online, https://www.forbes.com/sites/haydnshaughnessy/2013/03/07/why-is-samsung-such-an-innovative-company/ (1 Mar 2018).
- Sohn, S. Y. and Jung, C. S.(2010). Effect of creativity on innovation: do creativity initiatives have significant impact on innovative performance in Korean firms?, Creativity Research Journal, 22 (3), 320-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.503542
- Spreafico, C., Russo, D.(2016). TRIZ industrial case studies: a critical survey. Procedia CIRP, 39, 51-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.165
- Swann, P. 1993. Inference from Mixed Bags: The Economic Value of Patent Counts, Innovation Counts and the Lake, London Business School:Mimeo
- USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office, USA), https://10millionpatents.uspto.gov/ (1 May 2018).
- Weisberg, R. W. (2003). Case Studies of Innovation: Ordinary Thinking, Extraordinary Outcomes. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The International Handbook on Innovation. Oxford: Pergamon.