DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국판 삶의 균형 척도의 심리측정적 특성 및 감각 처리와의 관련성

Psychometric Characteristics of Korean Version of Life Balance Inventory (K-LBI) and Relationship Between Life Balance and Sensory Processing

  • 김은영 (순천향대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 이선욱 (대구대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 김영 (순천향대학교 웰니스코칭서비스센터) ;
  • 이상헌 (순천향대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 김혜진 (순천향대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 권정아 (순천향대학교 청소년교육상담학과)
  • Kim, Eun Young (Department of Occupational Therapy, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Lee, Sun Wook (Department of Occupational Therapy, Daegu University) ;
  • Kim, Young (Wellness Coaching Service Research Center, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Heon (Department of Occupational Therapy, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Kim, Heyjin (Department of Occupational Therapy, Soonchunhyang University) ;
  • Gwon, Jung-A (Department of Youth Education & Counseling, Soonchunhyang University)
  • 투고 : 2018.07.31
  • 심사 : 2018.09.14
  • 발행 : 2018.09.30

초록

목적 : 본 연구는 한국판 삶의 균형 척도(Korean version of Life Balance Inventory; K-LBI)의 타당도 및 신뢰도를 검증하고, 삶의 균형과 감각 처리 간 관련성을 제시하고자 하였다. 연구방법 : K-LBI는 번역 및 역번역 과정을 통해 구성되었다. 후기 청소년기 대학생을 대상으로 K-LBI와 한국판 지각된 스트레스 척도, 한국판 삶의 만족도 척도, 성인 행동 평가 척도를 실시하여 수렴 타당도를 검증하였고, 내적 일관성 및 검사-재검사 신뢰도를 측정하였다. 감각 처리와 삶의 균형 간의 관련성을 알아보기 위해 한국판 청소년/성인 감각 프로파일과 K-LBI 간 상관 분석을 실시하였다. 결과 : K-LBI와 수렴 타당도를 위한 척도 간 유의미한 상관관계(r = .337~.449, p < .01), 양호한 반분 신뢰도(r = .906, p < .01) 및 검사-재검사 신뢰도(ICC = .669, p < .01)가 산출되었다. 감각민감 혹은 감각회피 성향과 관계 삶의 균형 영역 간 정적 상관(r = .422~.443, p < .01) 및 등록저하와 도전 삶의 균형 영역 간 부적 상관(r = -.373, p < .05)이 나타났다. 결론 : 본 연구는 후기 청소년을 대상으로 K-LBI의 타당도와 신뢰도를 제시하였고 삶의 균형과 감각 처리 간의 관련성에 대한 이해를 제공한다.

Objective : The purpose of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Korean version of Life Balance Inventory (K-LBI) and to present the relationship between life balance and sensory processing. Methods : K-LBI was constructed through forward and backward translation. Convergent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were tested for college students. To verify convergent validity, correlation analyses between K-LBI and Korean version of Perceived Stress Scale, Korean version of Satisfaction With Life Scale, and Adult Self Report-Achenbach system of empirically based assessment were performed. Split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were also obtained for reliability verification. We performed the correlation analysis between K-LBI and Korean version of Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile. Results : A significant correlation was found between K-LBI and the scales for convergent validity. A favorable split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were calculated. The positive correlations were found between relationship life balance and sensory sensitivity/sensation avoiding quadrants. The negative correlation was found between challenges life balance and low registration. Conclusion : This study shows that K-LBI is a valid and reliable tool in Korea. It also provides an in-depth understanding of the relationship between life balance and sensory processing.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2003). Manual for the ASEBA adult forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.
  3. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  4. Ben-Avi, N., Almagor, M., & Engel-Yeger, B. (2012). Sensory processing difficulties and interpersonal relationships in adults: An exploratory study. Psychology, 3(1), 70-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.31012
  5. Brown, C. E., & Dunn, W. (2002). Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment Company.
  6. Cohen. S., Kamarch, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2136404
  7. Chess, S., & Thomas, A. (1998). The New York longitudinal scales adult temperament questionnaire test manual. Scottsdale, AZ: Behavioural Developmental Initiatives.
  8. Christiansen, C. H., & Matuska, K. M. (2006). Lifestyle balance: A review of concepts and research. Journal of Occupational Science, 13(1), 49-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2006.9686570
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01
  10. Derogatis, L. R., Rickels, K., & Rock, A. F. (1976). The SCL-90 and the MMPI: A step in the validation of a new self-report scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 128(3), 280-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjp.128.3.280
  11. Dickie, V. (2014). What is occupation? In B. A. B. Schell, G. Gillen, & M. E. Scaffa (Eds). Willard and Spackman's occupational therapy (12th ed., pp. 2-8). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
  12. Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
  13. Dunn, W. (1997). The impact of sensory processing abilities on the daily lives of young children and their families: A conceptual model. Infants & Young Children, 9(4), 23-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001163-199704000-00005
  14. Dirix, H. (2015). Development, validity and reliability evidence for the Flemish version of the Life Balance Inventory in people with multiple sclerosis, Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Gent, Ghent.
  15. Engel-Yeger, B., & Shochat, T. (2012). The relationship between sensory processing patterns and sleep quality in healthy adults. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(3), 134-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.2182/cjot.2012.79.3.2
  16. Evans, J. D. (1996). Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
  17. International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal Wellbeing Index (4th ed.). Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University. Available at: http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing-index.htm.
  18. Jung, H. (2016). Technical Adequacy of Korean Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (K-AASP). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Inje University, Gimhae-si, Korea.
  19. Keyes, C. L., Wissing, M., Potgieter, J. P., Temane, M., Kruger, A., & van Rooy, S. (2008). Evaluation of the mental health continuumshort form (MHC-SF) in setswana-speaking South Africans. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 15(3), 181-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.572
  20. Khodabakhsh, S., Cheong, L. S., & Rosli, N. A. (2016). The relationship between sensory processing patterns and depression in adults. Malaysian Online Journal of Counseling, 3(1), 49-56.
  21. Kim. K. I., Kim, J. H., & Won, H. T. (1984). Korean Manual of Symptom Checklist90-revision, Seoul, Chung Ang Aptitude Publishing Co.
  22. Kinnealey, M., & Fuiek, M. (1999). The relationship between sensory defensiveness, anxiety, depression and perception of pain in adults. Occupational Therapy International, 6(3), 195-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oti.97
  23. Kinnealey, M., Oliver, B., & Wilbarger, P. (1995). A phenomenological study of sensory defensiveness in adults. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(5), 444-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.49.5.444
  24. Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 5(2), 155-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
  25. Lariviere, N., Denis, C., Payeur, A., Ferron, A., Levesque, S., & Rivard, G. (2016). Comparison of objective and subjective life balance between women with and without a personality disorder. Psychiatric Quarterly, 87(4), 663-673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11126-016-9417-3
  26. Lariviere, N., & Levasseur, M. (2016). Translation and validation of the Life Balance Inventory: An occupational therapy questionnaire. Canadian journal of occupational therapy, 83(2), 103-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0008417416632260
  27. Larson, E. A., & Zemke, R. (2003). Shaping the temporal patterns of our lives: The social coordination of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 10(2), 80-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2003.9686514
  28. Law, M., Baptiste, S., Carswell, A., McColl, M. A., Polatajko, H., & Pollock, N. (2014). Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (5th ed.). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications ACE.
  29. Lee, J. (2014). Quality of life and occupational balance in college students according to their sensory processing abilities. Doctoral dissertation, University of Chungnam National University, Daejeon.
  30. Lee, E. H., Chung, B. Y., Suh, C. H., & Jung, J. Y. (2015). Korean versions of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14, 10 and 4): Psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic disease. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 29(1), 183-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/scs.12131
  31. Lim, N., Lee, H., & Suh, E. M. (2010). Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) findings in Korea. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 29(1), 21-47.
  32. Lim, Y. J. (2012). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale among Korean police officers, university students, and adolescents. Korean Journal of Psychology: General, 31(3), 877-896.
  33. Lim, Y. J., Ko, Y. G., Shin, H, C., & Cho, Y. (2013). Prevalence and correlates of complete mental health in the South Korean adult population. In C. Keyes (Eds.), Mental well-Being: International contributions to the study of positive mental health. New York: Springer.
  34. Lim, Y. J., Yu, B. H., Kim, D. K., & Kim, J. H. (2010). The positive and negative affect schedule: Psychometric properties of the Korean version. Psychiatry investigation, 7(3), 163-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.4306/pi.2010.7.3.163
  35. Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: Psychology Foundation of Australia Inc.
  36. Meyer, A. (1922). The philosophy of occupational therapy. Archives of Occupational Therapy, 1(1), 1-10.
  37. Matuska, K. (2010). Validity evidence for a model and measure of life balance. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
  38. Matuska, K. (2012a). Description and development of the Life Balance Inventory. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 32(1), 220-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20110610-01
  39. Matuska, K. (2012b). Validity evidence of a model and measure of life balance. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 32(1), 229-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/15394492-20110610-02
  40. Matuska, K. M., & Christiansen, C. H. (2008). A proposed model of lifestyle balance. Journal of Occupational Science, 15(1), 9-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2008.9686602
  41. Oh, K., & Kim, Y. (2010). Manual for the ASEBA adult forms. Seoul, Korea, HUNO Inc.
  42. Park, M. H., & Kim, K. M. (2006). The necessity for adult's sensory processing evaluating tool and the introduction of adolescent/adult sensory profile. Journal of Korean Society of Sensory Integration Therapists, 4(1), 17-28.
  43. Park, S. M., Park, H. Y., & Park, J. H. (2017). A Review on concept and measurement of occupational balance: Trend and therapeutic prospects, Journal of Korea Society for Wellness, 12(3), 115-125. https://doi.org/10.21097/ksw.2017.08.12.3.115
  44. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1(3), 385-401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014662167700100306
  45. Smith, N. R., Kielhofner, G., & Watts, J. H. (1986). The relationships between volition, activity pattern, and life satisfaction in the elderly. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 40(4), 278-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.40.4.278
  46. Taylor, R. R. (2017). Kielhofner's model of human occupation: theory and application (5th ed). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health.
  47. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063
  48. World Health Organisation. (2016). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. WHO. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/