DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Subjectivity about North Korean refugee : A Q-methodology Approach

북한이탈주민에 관한 주관성 연구 : Q방법론적 접근

  • Ahn, Lee-Su (Division of Public Administration, Shinhan University)
  • 안이수 (신한대학교 공공행정학과)
  • Received : 2017.12.12
  • Accepted : 2018.02.20
  • Published : 2018.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the cognizance of North Korean refugee by applying Q methodology, as well as to provide preliminary data for improving North Korean refugee's image. The study process let P sample, the study participants, use Q-sorting methodology to sort Q sample, which is composed of statements. 18 participants sorted 32 statements and 3 types of North Korean refugee cognizance were produced as a result. Those types are 1(N=8), 2(N=6), and 3(N=4), which are type favorable, type whereas negative stereotypical, and type neutralist. Favorable types agreed to ensure North Korean refugee groups' rights as a general protection, whereas negative stereotypical types had strong discrimination and prejudice towards North Korean refugee groups due to lack of related knowledge. Furthermore, neutralist types showed an objection to negative stereotypes against North Korean refugee, but they did not entirely agree to North Korean refugee either. It is necessary to develop a detailed strategy to improve the social image of North Korean refugee.

본 연구는 Q방법론을 통하여 북한이탈주민에 대한 인식을 분석하여, 향후 북한이탈주민 이미지 제고에 기초자료를 제공하는데 그 목적이 있다. 본 연구에서는 32개의 Q 표본을 선정하여 18명에게 분류토록 한 결과 모두 세 가지의 북한이탈 주민의 인식에 대한 유형이 도출되었다. 제1유형 우호적 지지형, 제2유형은 부정적 고정관념형, 제3유형은 중립 추구형으로 구분되었다. 우호적 지지형은 북한이탈주민의 인권을 보장해야 한다는 의견을 보였고, 부정적 고정관념형은 북한이탈주민들에게 차별적 인식을 강하게 가지고 있으며 북한이탈주민에 대한 정확한 지식이 없어서 막연한 편견들을 가지고 있었으며, 중립 추구형은 북한이탈주민에 대한 부정적 고정관념과 편견에는 반대하지만 막연하게 그들에 대하여 동의하지는 않는 태도를 보였다. 이상의 연구결과를 중심으로 향후 북한이탈주민의 사회적 이미지 개선을 위한 세부적인 전략을 개발해야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. NORTH KOREAN REFUGEES PROTECTION AND SETTLEMENT SUPPORT ACT. Ministry of Government Legislation
  2. Y. P. Jong & S. J. Han. (2006). Foreign Workers as Minorities: Policy Conflict Analysis. The Korea Public Administration Journal, 15(2), 157-184.
  3. Y. P. Jong. (2006). A Study on Minority Problems and Minority Policies in Korea. Proceedings of the Korean Association of Public Administration, 635-649.
  4. L. Wirth. (1945). The problem of minority groups, In R. Linton, Ed., The science of man in the world crisis (pp. 347-372). New York : Columbia University Press.
  5. 2017. e-country index. http://www.index.go.kr
  6. 2016. North Korean defectors' social integration survey. Seoul : Korea Hana Foundation.
  7. K. H. Kim. (2015). University Students' Perception of Policies Supporting North Korean Defectors: The Mediating Effects of Student's Attitudes toward North Korean Defectors. Journal of social security, 31(4), 1-27.
  8. K. H. Chae. (2017). The Adaptation Status of North Korean Defectors to South Korean Society and Its Effect on their Problem Solving Ability. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 18(10), 524-530. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.10.524
  9. I. H. Lee & H. J. Choi. (2017). Factors Influencing Social Adaptation of North Korean Defectors. Journal of Korean Public Health Nursing, 31(2), 341-351. https://doi.org/10.5932/JKPHN.2017.31.2.341
  10. H. S. Shin. (2017). Analyzing the North Korean Defectors" Performing Arts That Promotes Trust Building. The Journal of Cultural Policy, 31(2), 75-103.
  11. J. W. Kang. (2017). The Linguistic Integration of the Two Koreas - Centering on the language use of North Korean settlers in South Korea. Journal of Education & Culture, 23(2), 345-364. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2017.23.2.345
  12. H. K. Kim. (1997). Q Methodology and Creation of Advertising Message. Operant Subjectivity, 20(Issue 1/2), 28-29.
  13. H. G. Kim. (2008). Q Methodology : Philosophy, Theories, Analysis, and Application. Seoul : Communication Books, Inc..
  14. J. S. Seong & E. Y. Yeom. (2016). The Types and Characteristics of the Male Nurses Perceived by Female Nurses : An Application of Q- Methodology. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 17(1), 572-584. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.1.572
  15. E. J. Yeun, H. J. Kim, M. S. Jeon & J. A. Yoon. (2012). A Comparison General Public and Health Prefessionals' Perception toward Life-Sustaining Treatment. Journal of Human Subjectivity, 25, 21-34.
  16. M. Y. Jeon, M. H. Kim & J. M. Jo. (2007). Subjectivity on Aging:a Coorientational Approach. Journal of Human Subjectivity, 14, 129-145.
  17. C. H. Yang & J. Y. Lee. (2013). On the Use of Q Methodology in Research on the Subjective Perceptions of Election Campaign Advertising. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 13(1), 115-126. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.01.115
  18. H. G. Kim & C. Y. Cha. (2008). Preference Factors in the Materials of Television Life-information Program. Journal of Human Subjectivity, 17, 157-178.
  19. H. J. Kim. (2015). A Convergence Study on Competitiveness Perception of Festival Specialists on Local Festival-Focusing on Q Method. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(6), 133-139. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.6.133
  20. E. J. Kim. (2014). A Study on Type of Clinical Experience of Adaptation of New Nursing Staffs in a General Hospital. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(4), 443-454. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.4.443
  21. S. H. Ko, E. A. Park & M. A. Kim. (2014) The Typology of Gender Role Identity in Middle-aged Women using Q Methodology. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(6), 449-456. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.6.449
  22. L. S. Ahn. (2016). A study on types of AIDS perception : Focus on Q-methodology Application. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 17(10), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.10.46
  23. L. S. Ahn. (2018). Subjectivity about Sexual Minority : A Q-methodology Approach. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 18(1), 527-539 https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2018.18.01.527
  24. K. M. Yang & J. K. Chung. (2005). The Effects of Contact with North Korean Residents on Trust and Acceptance by South Koreans. The Korean Psychological Association, 11(1), 97-115.
  25. E. E. Jones, A. Farina, A. H. Hastorf, H. Markus, D. T. Miller & R. Scott. (1984). The dimensions of stigma. In E.E. Jones et al (Eds.), Social stigma: The psychology of marked relationships.(pp.24-79).New York, NY: Freeman.
  26. G. Falk. (2001). stigma : How We Treat Outsiders. Amherst : Prometheus Books.
  27. B. G. Link & J. C. Phelan. (2001). Conceptualizing Stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 363-385. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.363
  28. M. G. Kim. (2015). A Study on the Research Designs for Social Stigma against Persons with Psychiatric Disability based on the Social Interactionism. Journal of Critical Social Policy, 47(5), 7-42.
  29. S. W. Jin (2012). A Theoretical Approach to Korean Multicultural Education in Primary and Secondary School - Problems and Suggestions. The Journal of international relations, 15(1), 129-156.
  30. H. S. Yoo & H. S. Lee. (2014). The conflict of recognition between South Korean and North Korean refugees : Focused on Incheon City. The Journal of Incheon Studies, 20, 325-365.
  31. Y. K. Cho & Y. H. Choi. (2011). A Study on Social Conflict and Integration-Focusing on North Korean Defectors. The Korean Association for Local Government Studies, 423-446.
  32. Y. H. Choi & S. Y. Kim. (2013). South Korea Embraced Us, but South Koreans Have Never Accepted North Korean Defectors. - An Analysis of the Comments Posted on Major Internet Portal Sites Concerning North Korean Defectors and the Role of Public Relations in Communicating Unification. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 15(3), 187-219.
  33. J. D. Park. (2015). A Case Study on Multicultural Education Contents in Korea, International Journal of Glocal Culture, 4(1), 109-124.
  34. G. C. Thompson. (1966). The evaluation of public opinion. In B. Berelson, & M. Janowitz (Eds.), Reader in public opinion and communication, (2nd ed.). New York : The Free Press.