Fig 1. Mission profile [6]
Fig 2. Sketch configuration
Fig 3. NACA 25112
Fig 4. NACA 22112
Fig 5. Airfoil lift/drag ratio
Fig 6. Fixed wing compound drone example [7]
Fig 7. Wing configuration
Fig 8. First design result
Fig 9. Cm according to angle of attack
Fig 10. Simulation result 1
Fig 11. Design change result
Fig 12. After redesign, Cm according toangle of attack
Fig 13. Simulation result 2
Fig 14. Thrust tester (RC Benchmark 1580) [8]
Fig 15. Thrust test data
Fig 16. frame 3D model
Fig 17. 3D model
Fig 18. Actual production result
Fig 19. Pixhawk.2 [9]
Fig 20. Hovering test picture
Fig 21. Mission trajectory
Fig 22. Actual mission trajectory 1
Fig 23. Actual mission trajectory 2
Fig 24. XY plane flight position based onthe flight log
Fig 25. flight altitude based on the flight log
Table 1. Requirement
Table 2. Wing specification
References
- Kwon-Su Jeon, Yun Ki Jung and Jae-Woo Lee, "The Concept of Compound Aircraft, and the Development Trend and Future Prospects", Proceeding of the 2015 KSAS Spring Conference, 2015, pp. 497-500.
- Karl Nickel, Michael Wohlfahrt, "Tailless Aircraft in theory & practice", Edward Arnold, London, 1994, pp. 8-94
- Mark Drela, 2001, "X-FOIL 6.9 User Primer", URL : https://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/xfoil/xfoil_doc.txt
- XFLR5, 2013, "XFLR5 Analysis of foils and wi ngs operating at low Reynolds numbers", URL : https://ayera.dl.sourceforge.net/project/xflr5/Guidelines.pdf
- Aircraft Design Education Committee, "Aircraft Conceptual Design", KM, Seoul, 2001, pp. 145-168
- Reserch Gate, Mission profile uploaded by Richard L. Warr URL : https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Mission-profile-for-a-small-hybrid-electric-remotely-piloted-aircraft_fig3_269635945
- Droneit, MILVUS-1 URL : http://droneit.co.kr/sub_en/main/main.php Third Eye URL : http://thirdeye.co.kr/
- RC Benchmark 1580 URL : https://www.rcbenchmark.com/
- Pixhawk URL : http://pixhawk.org/