디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권1호
  • /
  • Pages.317-325
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

성격 유형을 바탕으로 하는 에이전트 기반 팀 해체 모형

An Agent-Based Model of Team Dissolution based on Personality Traits

  • 이성룡 (한국외국어대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • 투고 : 2017.12.02
  • 심사 : 2018.01.20
  • 발행 : 2018.01.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

팀 활동은 학생들의 문제해결 능력 배양과 팀워크의 학습을 위해 유용하다. 팀 활동이 좋은 결과로 마무리되는 것은 학생들의 성공경험 획득을 위해 중요한데, 특히 융 복합 교과에서는 더욱 그러하다. 본 연구에서는 대학 교과에서의 팀 활동에 있어 주어진 프로젝트 기한이 만료되기 전에 팀이 해체되는 경우에 대해 분석하고자 하였다. 팀의 해체가 팀원의 성격에 바탕을 두고 있다는 가정 하에 팀 해체의 요인이 되는 성격으로서 Dark Triad(DT)를 도입하였고 이를 방어하는 성격 요소로서 융화성을 도입하여 팀 해체 모형을 제안하였다. 제안된 모형은 에이전트 기반의 시뮬레이션을 통해 모의실험을 하였고 그 결과를 분석하였다. DT를 소유한 학생의 비율은 팀의 제한 인원과 팀의 해체율에 영향을 미치지만 팀원의 융화성을 높임으로 인해 팀의 해체율을 낮출 수 있음이 확인되었다. 개발한 모형은 팀의 해체와 관련된 연구에 기초로 제공될 수 있으며 팀 활동을 에이전트 기반의 시뮬레이션으로 접근한 방법론의 활용은 향후 팀 활동을 분석하고 지원하는데 유용하리라 기대한다.

A satisfactory ending of the project is crucial for the students to achieve success experience. In this study, we analyze the teams' dismantling before the project deadline. We propose a team dissolution model based on the assumption that the disharmony caused by the members' personality traits is the main reason for the team break up. The Dark Triad and the Communion are introduced to build the model. We simulated the proposed model using an agent-based simulation and analyzed the results. We found that the ratio of owning DT impacts the maximum allowable size of the team and the team's rate of dissolution, but the team has been able to reduce the team's dissolution rate by increasing the team's harmony. We expect that we efficiently used the developed model with the agent-based simulation for the studies related to the dismantling of teams.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. S. B. Yoon, E. Y. Jang, "A Development of Creative Capstone Design Education." Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 15-20, 2014. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2014.5.4.015
  2. Eduardo Salas, N. J. Cooke & M. A. Rosen, "On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: Discoveries and Developments." Human Factors, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 540-547, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288457
  3. I. A. Kang, E. S. Jung, "A Qualitative Analysis on the Differences between The Student-Selected Teams and The Learning Style-based Teams in terms of Their Satisfactory Levels on the Learning Activities." The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 67-95, 2010.
  4. Carsten K. W. De Dreu & L. R. Weingart, "Task Versus Relationship Conflict, Team Performance, and Team Member Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis." Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, No. 4, pp. 741-749, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.741
  5. Paul K. Bergey, "Team Formation and Performance." IEEE Engineering Management Review, Vol. 40, No. 1, p. 2, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2011.2182078
  6. S. R. Yee, "An analysis of team performance based on member formation: Approached by the three triads of Enneagram." Journal of Engineering Education Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 75-83, 2013. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2013.16.1.75
  7. S. R. Yee, "A Study of Team Satisfaction and Associated Factors in Engineering College Freshmen." Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 315-324, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.2.315
  8. S. R. Yee, "Cognition of Engineering Students in Team Activities through a Comparative Analysis between Grades." Journal of Engineering Education Research, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 11-20, 2016. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2016.19.1.11
  9. S. R. Yee, "The Development of an Agent-Based Model for Simulating Self-Controlled Team Building Behavior," Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 335-345, 2017. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.2.335
  10. Xiaocong Fan and J. Yen, "Modeling and simulating human teamwork behaviors using intelligent agents." Physics of Life Reviews, Vol. 1, pp. 173-201, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2004.10.001
  11. Helen P. N. Hughes et. al., "Agent-based modelling and simulation: The potential contribution to organizational psychology." Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 85, pp. 487-502, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.2012.02053.x
  12. Richard M. Crowder et.al., "The Development of an Agent-Based Modeling Framework for Simulating Engineering Team Work." IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, Vol. 42, No. 6, pp. 1425-1439, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCA.2012.2199304
  13. Murray R. Barrick and M.K. Mount, "Yes, Personality Matters: Moving on to More Important Matters." Human Performance, Vol. 18, No. 44, pp. 359-372, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1804_3
  14. Murray R. Barrick, et. al., "Relating Member Ability and Personality to Work-Team Processes and Team Effectiveness." Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 83, pp. 377-91, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.377
  15. Timothy A. Judge and J.A. LePine, "The bright and dark sides of personality: implications for personnel selection in individual and team contexts." Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace; management challenges and symptoms, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., pp. 332-355, 2007.
  16. Delroy L. Paulhus and K.M. Williams, "The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy." Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 36, pp. 556-563, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
  17. Adrian Furnham et. al., "The Dark Triad of Personality: A 10 Year Review." Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 199-216, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12018
  18. Ernest H. O'Boyle, Jr. and D.R. Forsyth, "A Meta-Analysis of the Dark Triad and Work Behavior: A Social Exchange Perspective." Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 97, No. 3, pp. 557-579, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025679
  19. Seth M. Spain et. al., "The dark side of personality at work." Journal of Organizational Behavior, wileyonlinelibrary.com, DOI: 10.1002/job.1894, 2013.
  20. John F. Rauthmann, "The Dark Triad and Interpersonal Perception: Similarities and Differences in the Social Consequences of Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy." Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp.487-496, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611427608
  21. Peter K. Jonason, "What Have You Done For Me Lately? Friendship-Selection in the Shadow of the Dark Triad Traits." Evolutionary Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp.400-421, 2012.
  22. Mitja D. Back et. al., "Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism- popularity link at zero acquaintance." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 98, No. 1, pp.132-145, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016338
  23. Peter K. Jonason et. el., "The Dark Triad at work: How toxic employees get their way." Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 52, pp.449-453, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.008
  24. David Bakan, The Duality of Human Existence: An Essay on Psychology and Religion, Chicago: Rand McNally & Co., 1966.
  25. Y. E. Lee, S. W. Park, "Agency and Communion : Two Fundamental Dimensions of Human Existence." Korean Journal of Psychology: General, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 283-308, 2016. https://doi.org/10.22257/kjp.2016.06.35.2.283
  26. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/