DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics of accumulated soil carbon and soil respiration in temperate deciduous forest and alpine pastureland

  • Jeong, Seok-Hee (Department of Biological Science, Konkuk Universtiy) ;
  • Eom, Ji-Young (Department of Biological Science, Konkuk Universtiy) ;
  • Park, Ju-Yeon (Department of Biological Science, Konkuk Universtiy) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Ho (Division of Ecosystem Service & Research Planning, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Seok (Department of Biological Science, Konkuk Universtiy)
  • 투고 : 2017.07.31
  • 심사 : 2018.01.12
  • 발행 : 2018.01.31

초록

Background: For various reasons such as agricultural and economical purposes, land-use changes are rapidly increasing not only in Korea but also in the world, leading to shifts in the characteristics of local carbon cycle. Therefore, in order to understand the large-scale ecosystem carbon cycle, it is necessary first to understand vegetation on this local scale. As a result, it is essential to comprehend change of the carbon balance attributed by the land-use changes. In this study, we attempt to understand accumulated soil carbon (ASC) and soil respiration (Rs) related to carbon cycle in two ecosystems, artificially turned forest into pastureland from forest and a native deciduous temperate forest, resulted from different land-use in the same area. Results: Rs were shown typical seasonal changes in the alpine pastureland (AP) and temperate deciduous forest (TDF). The annual average Rs was $160.5mg\;CO_2\;m^{-2}h^{-1}$ in the AP, but it was $405.1mg\;CO_2\;m^{-2}h^{-1}$ in the TDF, indicating that the Rs in the AP was lower about 54% than that in the TDF. Also, ASC in the AP was $124.49Mg\;C\;ha^{-1}$ from litter layer to 30-cm soil depth. The ASC was about $88.9Mg\;C\;ha^{-1}$, and it was 71.5% of that of the AP. The temperature factors in the AP was high about $4^{\circ}C$ on average compared to the TDF. In AP, it was observed high amount of sunlight entering near the soil surface which is related to high soil temperature is due to low canopy structure. This tendency is due to the smaller emission of organic carbon that is accumulated in the soil, which means a higher ASC in the AP compared to the TDF. Conclusions: The artificial transformation of natural ecosystems into different ecosystems is proceeding widely in the world as well as Korea. The change in land-use type is caused to make the different characteristics of carbon cycle and storage in same region. For evaluating and predicting the carbon cycle in the vegetation modified by the human activity, it is necessary to understand the carbon cycle and storage characteristics of natural ecosystems and converted ecosystems. In this study, we studied the characteristics of ecosystem carbon cycle using different forms in the same region. The land-use changes from a TDF to AP leads to changes in dominant vegetation. Removal of canopy increased light and temperature conditions and slightly decreased SMC during the growing season. Also, land-use change led to an increase of ASC and decrease of Rs in AP. In terms of ecosystem carbon sequestration, AP showed a greater amount of carbon stored in the soil due to sustained supply of above-ground liters and lower degradation rate (soil respiration) than TDF in the high mountains. This shows that TDF and AP do not have much difference in terms of storage and circulation of carbon because the amount of carbon in the forest biomass is stored in the soil in the AP.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Batjes, N. H. (2014). Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science., 65, 10-21.
  2. Canadell, J., Jackson, R. B., Ehleringer, J. B., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996). Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia, 108, 83-595.
  3. Climatological Normals of Korea. (2011). Korea meteorological administration. Seoul: Climatological Normals of Korea.
  4. Davidson, E., Belk, E., & Boone, R. D. (1998). Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Global Change Biology, 4, 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00128.x
  5. Davidson, E. A., Verchot, L. V., Cattanio, J. H., Ackerman, I. L., & JEM, C. (2000). Effects of soil water content on soil respiration in forests and cattle pastures of eastern Amazonia. Biogeochemistry, 48, 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006204113917
  6. Dixon, R., Brown, S., Houghton, R. E. A., Solomon, A. M., Trexler, M. C., & Wisniewski, J. (1994). Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science (Washington), 263, 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.263.5144.185
  7. Epron, D., Farque, L., Lucot, E., & Badot, P. M. (1999). Soil $CO_2$ efflux in a beech forest: dependence on soil temperature and soil water content. Annals of Forest Science, 56, 221-226. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19990304
  8. Fierer, N., Schimel, J. P., & Holden, P. A. (2003). Variations in microbial community composition through two soil depth profiles. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35, 167-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00251-1
  9. Guo, L. B., & Gifford, R. M. (2002). Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis. Global Change Biology, 8, 345-360.
  10. Hooper, D. U., Bignell, D. E., Brown, V. K., Brussard, L., Mark Dangerfield, J., Wall, D. H., Wardle, D. A., Coleman, D. C., Giller, K. E., Lavelle, P., Van der Putten, W. H., Ruiter, P. C., Rusek, J., Silver, W. L., Tiedje, J. M., & Wolters, V. (2000). Interactions between aboveground and belowground biodiversity in terrestrial ecosystems: patterns, mechanisms, and feedbacks. Bioscience, 50, 1049-1061. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[1049:IBAABB]2.0.CO;2
  11. Houghton, R. A. (1999). The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850-1990. Tellus B, 51, 298-313. https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v51i2.16288
  12. Hu, C., Liu, G., Fu, B., Chen, L., Lyu, Y., & Guo, L. (2014). Soil carbon stock and flux in plantation forest and grassland ecosystems in Loess Plateau, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 24, 423-435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-014-0700-7
  13. Jobbagy, E. G., & Jackson, R. B. (2000). The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecological Applications, 10, 423-436.
  14. Kellman, L., Beltrami, H., & Risk, D. (2007). Changes in seasonal soil respiration with pasture conversion to forest in Atlantic Canada. Biogeochemistry, 82, 101-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-006-9056-0
  15. Lloyd, J., & Taylor, J. A. (1994). On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Functional Ecology, 8, 315-323. https://doi.org/10.2307/2389824
  16. Luyssaert, S., Schulze, E. D., Borner, A., Knohl, A., Hessenmoller, D., Law, B. E., Ciais, P., & Grace, J. (2008). Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature, 455, 213-215. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07276
  17. Michelsen, A., Andersson, M., Jensen, M., Kjoller, A., & Gashew, M. (2004). Carbon stocks, soil respiration and microbial biomass in fire-prone tropical grassland, woodland and forest ecosystems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36, 1707-1717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.04.028
  18. Musselman, R. C., & Fox, D. G. (1991). A review of the role of temperate forests in the global $CO_2$ balance. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 41, 798-807. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1991.10466876
  19. Noh, T. H., Han, B. H., Kim, J. Y., Lee, M. Y., & Yoo, K. J. (2013). Actual vegetation and structure of plant community in Daegwallyeong ranch, Gangwondo(province). Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology, 27, 579-591. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2013.27.5.579
  20. Ohashi, M., Gyokusen, K., & Saito, A. (2000). Contribution of root respiration to total soil respiration in a Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) artificial forest. Ecological Research, 15, 323-333. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2000.00351.x
  21. Pachauri, R. K., Allen, M. R., Barros, V. R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., Church, J. A., Clarke, L., Dahe, Q., Dasgupta, P., Dubash, N. K., Edenhofer, O., Elgizouli, I. , Field, C. B., Forster, P., Friedlingstein, P., Fuglestvedt, J., Gomez-Echeverri, L., Hallegatte, S., Hegerl, G., Howden, M., Jiang, K., Jimenez Cisneroz, B., Kattsov, V., Lee, H., Mach, K. J., Marotzke, J., Mastrandrea, M. D., Meyer, L., Minx, J., Mulugetta, Y., O'Brien, K., Oppenheimer, M., Pereira, J. J., Pichs-Madruga, R., Plattner, G. K., Portner, H. O., Power, S. B., Preston, B., Ravindranath, N. H., Reisinger, A., Riahi, K., Rusticucci, M., Scholes, R., Seyboth, K., Sokona, Y., Stavins, R., Stocker, T. F., Tschakert, P., van Vuuren, D., & van Ypserle, J. P. (2014). Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Geneva: IPCC Secretariat.
  22. Paul, K. I., Polglase, P. J., Nyakuengama, J. G., & Khanna, P. K. (2002). Change in soil carbon following afforestation. Forest Ecology and Management, 168, 241-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00740-X
  23. Pregitzer, K. S., Laskowski, M. J., Burton, A. J., Lessard, V. C., & Zak, D. R. (1998). Variation in sugar maple root respiration with root diameter and soil depth. Tree Physiology, 18, 665-670. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/18.10.665
  24. Protocol, K. (1997). United Nations framework convention on climate change. Kyoto: Kyoto Protocol.
  25. Pumpanen, J., Kolari, P., Ilvesniemi, H., Minkkinen, K., Vesala, T., Niinisto, S., Lohila, A., Larmola, T., Morero, M., Pihlatie, M., Janssens, I., Yuste, J. C., Grünzweig, J. M., Reth, S., Subke, J. A., Savage, K., Kutsch, W., ostreng, G., Ziegler, W., Anthoni, P., Lindroth, A., Hari, P., & Janssens, I. (2004). Comparison of different chamber techniques for measuring soil $CO_2$ efflux. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 123, 159-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.12.001
  26. Raich, J. W., & Tufekciogul, A. (2000). Vegetation and soil respiration: correlations and controls. Biogeochemistry, 48, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006112000616
  27. Sheng, H. A. O., Yang, Y., Yang, Z., Chen, G., Xie, J., Guo, J., & Zou, S. (2010). The dynamic response of soil respiration to land-use changes in subtropical China. Global Change Biology, 16, 1107-1121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01988.x
  28. Suh, S. U., Chun, Y. M., Chae, N. Y., Kim, J., Lim, J. H., Yokozawa, M., Lee, M. S., & Lee, J. S. (2006). A chamber system with automatic opening and closing for continuously measuring soil respiration based on an open-flow dynamic method. Ecological Research, 21, 405-414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-005-0137-7
  29. Suseela, V., Conant, R. T., Wallenstein, M. D., & Dukes, J. S. (2012). Effects of soil moisture on the temperature sensitivity of heterotrophic respiration vary seasonally in an old-field climate change experiment. Global Change Biology, 18, 336-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02516.x
  30. Vesterdal, L., Elberling, B., Christiansen, J. R., Callesen, I., & Schmidt, I. K. (2012). Soil respiration and rates of soil carbon turnover differ among six common European tree species. Forest Ecology and Management, 264, 185-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.009
  31. Wang, G., Qian, J., Cheng, G., & Lai, Y. (2002). Soil organic carbon pool of grassland on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau and its global implication. Science of the Total Environment, 291, 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01100-7
  32. Wang, C., Yang, J., & Zhang, Q. (2006). Soil respiration in six temperate forests in China. Global Change Biology, 12, 2103-2114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01234.x
  33. White, R. P., Murray, S., Rohweder, M., Prince, S. D., & Thompson, K. M. (2000). Grassland ecosystems (p. 81). Washington DC: World Resources Institute.
  34. Wildung, R. E., Garland, T. R., & Buschbom, R. L. (1975). The interdependent effects of soil temperature and water content on soil respiration rate and plant root decomposition in arid grassland soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 7, 373-378.
  35. Wu, Y., Liu, G., Fu, B., Liu, Z., & Hu, H. (2006). Comparing soil $CO_2$ emission in pine plantation and oak shrub: dynamics and correlations. Ecological Research, 21, 840-848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-006-0040-x
  36. Xu, Z., Tang, S., Xiong, L., Yang, W., Yin, H., Tu, L., Wu, F., Chen, L., & Tan, B. (2015). Temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in China's forest ecosystems: Patterns and controls. Applied Soil Ecology, 93, 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.04.008

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of micro-environment in ridge and southern slope on soil respiration in Quercus mongolica forest vol.42, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-018-0087-y
  2. Effect of precipitation on soil respiration in a temperate broad-leaved forest vol.42, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41610-018-0071-6
  3. Effects of Experimental Throughfall Exclusion on Soil Respiration in a Continental Coniferous Stand, South Korea vol.11, pp.9, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/f11090972
  4. Effect of Heavy Machine Traffic on Soil CO2 Concentration and Efflux in a Pinus koraiensis Thinning Stand vol.12, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/f12111497