DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Strengthening Records Management as a Solution to the Nonexistence of Information

정보부존재 해결방안으로서 기록 생산단계 강화방안 연구

  • 권현진 (한국외국어대학교 대학원 정보?기록학과) ;
  • 이영학 (한국외국어대학교 대학원 정보?기록학과)
  • Received : 2018.10.24
  • Accepted : 2018.11.20
  • Published : 2018.11.30

Abstract

As nonexisting information affects actual information release rate, the study noted that the absence of records leads to the "nonexistence of information." Therefore, in this research, it was argued that records management should be thoroughly controlled from the stage of record production to solve problems such as the loss/damage/neglect/destruction/misclassification/ reduction of preservation periods and more. Through the management from the production stage, it is expected that the nonexistence of information problem will not occur and can be used as a tool for a demonstration of why the nonexistence of information exists even if such information occurs.

본 연구는 기록부존재 현상이 정보부존재로 이어지는 점에 주목했다. 기록의 분실${\cdot}$훼손${\cdot}$방치${\cdot}$무단파기${\cdot}$오분류${\cdot}$보존기간 하향 책정 등으로 인한 기록부존재 현상을 해결하기 위해선 기록 생산단계에서부터 철저한 기록관리가 이루어져야 함을 주장하였다. 이를 통해 정보부존재가 발생하지 않을 수 있고, 정보부존재가 발생하더라도 왜 정보부존재인지에 대한 설명도구로서 쓰일 수 있을 것이라 기대한다.

Keywords

<표 1> 정보부존재 처리규정 신설이유

HKGRBG_2018_v18n4_25_t0001.png 이미지

<표 2> 연도별 중앙행정기관 정보부존재 증가추세

HKGRBG_2018_v18n4_25_t0002.png 이미지

<표 3> 연도별 중앙행정기관 정보부존재∙비공개 건수 비율 비교

HKGRBG_2018_v18n4_25_t0003.png 이미지

<표 4> 연도별 지방자치단체 정보부존재 현황

HKGRBG_2018_v18n4_25_t0004.png 이미지

<표 5> 연도별 지방자치단체 정보부존재∙비공개 비율

HKGRBG_2018_v18n4_25_t0005.png 이미지

<표 6> 연구참여자의 기본적인 인적사항

HKGRBG_2018_v18n4_25_t0006.png 이미지

<표 7> 정보부존재 통지를 했다가 이의제기하자 결정통지를 번복하는 사례

HKGRBG_2018_v18n4_25_t0007.png 이미지

References

  1. National Archives of Korea (2018). National Records Management Innovation Plan report.
  2. Kim, Bong-Cheol (2014). A study on the information available in the public sector as a subject of publication within the meaning of the Information Publishing Act. Journal of Lawyers Association, 63(6), 94-135. https://doi.org/10.17007/klaj.2014.63.6.003
  3. Kim, You-Seung & Choi, Jeong-Min (2015). A study on non-existence information of the information disclosure system: focused on the central administrative agencies. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 46, 153-187.
  4. Seoul (2016). 2017 Information disclosure task manual, 49-63.
  5. Seol, Moon-Won (2018). Redesigning Archival Appraisal Policies for Improving Accountability of Public Bodies. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 55, 5-38.
  6. Yoon, Kwang-Suk & Kim, Hyun-Sung (2010). Enhancing freedom of information in the public sector: an empirical study. Seoul. The Korea Institute of Public Administration.
  7. Yoon, Chae-Won (2015). A study on improvement of non-existence of records: focusing on metropolitan government. Master's thesis. The Graduate School of Archival Science Chung-Ang University.
  8. Yim, Jin-Hee & Lee, Zoon-Ky (2010). A study on the information providing behavior of public servants responding to the Information Disclosures. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 23, 179-225.
  9. Cho, Sung-Kyu (2015). Legal Issues related to the Refusal Disposition of Information Disclosure: Focusing on the Absence of Information. The Korean Journal of Administrative Law, 43, 83-109.
  10. Central Administration Records Management Council (2018). Part 1 National registrar policy in the field.
  11. Central Administration Records Management Council (2018). Part 2 National Record Presidents' Meeting Preliminary Questionnaire.
  12. Central Administration Records Management Council (2018). Part 3 Improvement of records management status evaluation system.
  13. Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2017). 2016 Annual disclosure of information.
  14. Ministry of the Interior and Safety (2012). Criteria and procedures for non-existence of information.
  15. Lee, Chang-Soo (2018). Even if there is data, pretend to be without data ... 'Right to Know' still lack. World News. doi: https://goo.gl/VDEdGa