STI Policy Review

과학기술정책연구원 (Science & Technology Policy Institute)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Entrepreneurial Universities - Towards a Revised Paradigm

  • Meissner, Dirk (Higher School of Economics, National Research University / Research laboratory for Science and Technology Studies)
  • 발행 : 2017.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This article provides a comprehensive review of the entrepreneurial university concept and its place and role in the triple helix of university, industry, and government. This is increasingly important because stake-holders' expectations towards universities are growing; this growth in turn leads to increased pressure on universities to move beyond their traditional roles and models towards taking responsibility for economic development, large scale basic education and targeted further education and the development of value from research. These expectations provide opportunities for universities, but impose threats on the existing models and practices. It further elaborates on implications for university management, departments, faculty members and supporting organizations. Moreover it reflects on the meaning of the entrepreneurial university for stakeholders, i.e., university boards, regional and national policy and administrative bodies, funding agencies, the business community, university ranking institutions and the global university community overall. Recent literature on entrepreneurial universities is incomplete and mostly focused on the commercialization of research, technology transfer and the third mission of universities. The article expands the predominant thinking about entrepreneurial universities and gives a broader structured definition. Eventually the article shows the need for STI policy to intervene and measures for developing entrepreneurial universities further.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2009). The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. The Journal Of Industrial Economics, 54(4),637-676
  2. Bell, E. (2010). International capacity building for sustainable growth: What role for the world's learned societies? Foresight-Russia, 4(1), 60-63. (in Russian)
  3. Bramwell, A., & Wolfe, D. A. (2008). Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37(2008), 1175-1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.016
  4. Baskaran, A., & Muchie, M. (2008). Foreign direct investment and internationalization of R&D: The case of BRICS economies (DIIPER Research Series Working Paper No. 7). Retrieved from https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/4200/1/Baskaran_-_Mammo_DIIPER_Working_paper_2008-7.pdf
  5. Cervantes, M., & Meissner, D. (2014). Commercialising public research under the open innovation model: New trends. Foresight-Russia, 8(3), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459x.2014.3.70.81
  6. Demirbag, M., & Glaister, K. W. (2010). Factors determining offshore location choice for R&D projects: A comparative study of developed and emerging regions. Journal of Management Studies, 47(8), 1534-1560. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00948.x
  7. Dooley L., & Kirk, D. (2007). University-industry collaboration. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(3), 316-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060710776734
  8. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  9. Etzkowitz, H., Ranga, M., Benner, M., Guaranys, L., Maculan, A. M., & Kneller, R. (2008). Pathways to the entrepreneurial university: Towards a global convergence. Science and Public Policy, 35(9), 681-695. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234208X389701
  10. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research policy, 29(2), 313-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
  11. Gokhberg, L., & Meissner, D. (2013). Innovation: Superpowered invention. Nature 501, 313-314. doi:10.1038/501313a
  12. Guinet J., & Meissner, D. (2012). Open innovation: Implications for corporate strategies, government policy and international R&D spillovers. Foresight-Russia, 6(1), 26-36. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459X.2012.1.26.36
  13. Hemphil, T., & Vonortas, N. S. (2003). Strategic research partnerships: A managerial perspective. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15(2), 255-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953732032000051145
  14. Hertzfeld, H. R., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2006). Intellectual property protection mechanisms in research partnerships. Research Policy, 35(6), 825-838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.006
  15. Lawrence, D., & Kirk, D. (2007). University-industry collaboration. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(3), 316-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060710776734
  16. Luger, M., & Goldstein, H. (1997). The role of public universities. In R. Bingham, & R. Mier, (Eds.), Dilemmas of urban economic development (pp. 104-134). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
  17. Martinell A., Meyer M., & von Tunzelmann, N. (2008). Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 259-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9031-5
  18. Meissner, D. (2013). Instruments to measure Foresight. In D. Meissern, L. Gokhberg, & A. Sokolov (Eds.), Science, Technology and Innovation Policy for the Future (pp. 43-62). Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer.
  19. Meissner, D. (2014). Approaches for developing national STI strategies. STI Policy Review, 5(1), 34-56. https://doi.org/10.22675/STIPR.2014.5.1.034
  20. Mrinalini, N., & Wakdikar, S. (2008). Foreign R&D centers in India: Is there a positive impact? Current Science, 94(5), 452-458.
  21. O'Shea R. P., Allen T. J., Morse, K. P., Colm O'Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&D Management, 37(1), 1-16.
  22. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2013). Commercialising public research: New trends and strategies. Paris: OECD. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264193321-en, accessed 17.06.2014.
  23. Schibany, A., & Reiner, C. (2014). Can basic research provide a way out of economic stagnation? Foresight-Russia, 8(4), 54-63.
  24. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2), 115-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2003.12.006
  25. Sivak, Y., & Yudkevich, M. (2008). Closed academic environment and local academic conventions. Foresight-Russia, 2(4), 32-41. (in Russian) https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459X.2008.3.32.43
  26. Tether, B., & Tajar, A. (2008). Beyond industry-university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base. Research Policy, 37, 1079-1095 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.003
  27. Williams, T. & Vonortas, N. S. (2015). Strategic alliances/knowledge-intensive partnerships. In N. S. Vonortas, P. C. Rouge, & A. Aridi (2015) (Eds.), Innovation policy: A practical introduction - Series of springerbriefs in entrepreneurship and innovation (pp 47- 64). New York; Heidelberg; Dordrecht; London: Springer.
  28. Wong P. K., Ho Y. O., & Singh A. (2007). Towards an ''entrepreneurial university'' model to support knowledge-based economic development: The case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, 35(6), 941-958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.007
  29. Youtie, J., & Shapira, P. (2008). Building an innovation hub: A case study of the transformation of university roles in regional technological and economic development. Research Policy, 37(8),1188-1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.012