DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of floor type and hanging type environmental enrichment on the behavior of growing pigs

바닥형과 현수형 환경 보조물이 육성돈의 행동에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Doo-Wan (Swine Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Young-Hwa (Swine Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Min, Ye-Jin (Swine Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Yu, Dong-Jo (Swine Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Jeong, Yong-Dae (Swine Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration)
  • 김두완 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 양돈과) ;
  • 김영화 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 양돈과) ;
  • 민예진 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 양돈과) ;
  • 유동조 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 양돈과) ;
  • 정용대 (농촌진흥청 국립축산과학원 양돈과)
  • Received : 2017.09.29
  • Accepted : 2017.11.03
  • Published : 2017.11.30

Abstract

Animal Welfare is spreading throughout the world, but remains weak in Korean swine farms. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the effect of floor type and hanging type environmental enrichment on the behavior of growing pigs under the traditional feeding environment. A total of 45 crossbred pigs (Yorkshire${\times}$Landrace${\times}$Duroc; average weight, $33.35{\pm}5.5kg$) were assigned into three treatments consisting of control, hanging type(T1) and floor type(T2) with three replicates in semi-slurry pen. The hanging enrichment was suspended at shoulder height of the pigs, and the floor enrichment was fixed in the center of the pens. Growth and cortisol were estimated at the end of the experimental period. Behaviour patterns were analyzed on the first and eighth days after starting the experiment. Growth was not differed among control and treatments. However, cortisol was decreased in T2 compared to control(25.28 vs. 46.75 ng/mL; p<0.05). On the first day, movement and aggression were lower in both treatments than in control(p<0.01). On the eighth day, time and frequency of playing action were increased in T2 compared to T1(p<0.01) and both treatment groups showed more active behaviour than control(p<0.01). These results suggested that the enrichment may meet the natural action requirement of pigs. Therefore, our data can be utilized as basic information for welfare with environmental enrichments in farm animals.

경제동물에 대한 동물복지에 대한 관심은 전세계적으로 고조되고 있는 추세이다. 그러나, 국내 양돈농가는 경제성 등을 이유로 고려하지 않거나 미비한 도입으로 돼지 본연의 행동이 제한되고 있다. 따라서, 본 연구의목적은 일반적인 사육환경에 환경보조물의 제공이 육성돈의 행동특성에 미치는 영향을 구명하고자 실시하였다. 실험동물은 45두의 3원 교잡육성돈(요크셔${\times}$랜드레이스${\times}$두록; 평균체중, $33.35{\pm}5.5kg$)을 준비하였고, 완전임의배치법(randomized complete block design)에 의해 3개 처리구(대조구; 현수형 환경보조물, T1; 바닥형 환경보조물, T2)에 처리구당 3반복, 반복당 5두씩 반슬러리 돈방에 배치하였다. 현수형 환경보조물은 돼지의 어깨 높이에 현수하였고, 바닥형은 돈방의 가운데에 고정시켰다. 시험기간은 14일간 수행하였으며 시험종료일에 스트레스호르몬인 코티졸(cortisol) 농도를 분석하였고 행동특성은 1과 8일차에 촬영하였고 베가스 프로(Vegas Pro) 13.0 프로그램을 활용하여 및 분석하였다. 체중 및 일당증체량은 대조구와 처리구들간 차이가 없었다. 코티졸호르몬은 T2(25.28 ng/mL)에서 대조구(46.75 ng/mL)보다 유의적으로 낮았다(p<0.05). 1일차 행동 유형별 지속시간은 움직임과 공격 항목에서 대조구에 비해 처리구에서 유의적으로 낮았다(p<0.01). 8일차 놀이행동 지속시간에서 처리구2는 925.12초로 T1의 323.91초 보다 유의적으로 높았다(p<0.01). 반면에 처리구들에 비해 대조구는 움직이지 않는 시간이 많았다(p<0.01). 이러한 결과는 환경보조물 제공이 돼지간 공격성을 감소시키고 돼지의 행동을 활동적으로 만들어 돼지 본연의 행동요구를 충족시킬 수 있음을 시사한다. 그러나, 국내에서 환경보조물에 대한 연구는 미흡하므로 본 연구결과는 보조물을 이용한 동물복지에 대한 기초자료로서 활용 가능할 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. G. Moon, D. M. Ha, J. H, Jeon, D. H. Kim, "A study on the selection of specific behaviours of pigs as a measure of animal welfare assessment", Journal of Agriculture & Life Science, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 63-72, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2014.48.5.63
  2. V. E. Beattie, N. E. O'Connell, B. W, Moss, "Influence of environmental enrichment on the behaviour, performance and meat quality of domestic pigs", Livestock Production Science, vol. 65, no. 1-2, pp. 71-79, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00179-7
  3. V. Petersen, H. B. Simonsen, L. G. Lawson, "The effect of environmental stimulation on the development of behaviour in pigs", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 45, no. 3-4, pp. 215-224, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)00631-2
  4. D. S. Arey, "The effect of bedding on the behaviour and welfare of pigs", Animal Welfare, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 235-246, 1993.
  5. D. Fraser, P. A. Phillips, B. K. Thompson, T. Tennessen, "Effects of straw on the behaviour of growing pigs", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 30, no. 3-4, pp. 307-318. 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(91)90135-K
  6. C. A. P. Lyons, J. M. Bruce, V. R. Fowler, P. R. English, "A comparison of productivity and welfare of growing pigs in four intensive systems", Livestock Production Science, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 265-274, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(95)00050-U
  7. H. R. C. Kelly, J. M. Bruce, P. R. English, V. R. Fowler, S. A. Edwards, "Behaviour of 3-week weaned pigs in straw-flow, deep straw and flat deck housing systems", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 68, no, 4, pp. 269-280, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00109-X
  8. J. H. Guy, P. Rowlinson, J. P. Chadwick, A. Ellis, "Behaviour of two genotypes of growing-finishing pig in three different housing systems", Applied. Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 75, no. 23, pp. 193-206, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00197-6
  9. D. W. Kim, Y. H. Kim, K. S. Kim, K. H. Kim, "Effect of mixing of suckling piglets on change of body surface temperature in sows and piglets", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 135-140, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.1.135
  10. K. H. Kim, K. S. Kim, D. W. Kim, S. J. Sa, Y. H. Kim, "Effects of supplementation of dietary betaine on apparent nutrient digestibility and physiological responses in finishing pigs", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 407-414, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.12.407
  11. G. Greguric Gracner, N. Semiga, M. Ostovic, A. Ekert Kabalin, K. Matkovic, Z. Pavicic, "The effect of environmental enrichment objects on weight gain in weaned pigs", Veterinarski Arhiv, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 333-339, 2013.
  12. G. D. Bottoms, O. F. Roesel, F. D. Rausch, E. L. Akins, "Circadian variation in plasma cortisol and corticosterone in pigs and mares" American Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 785-790, 1972.
  13. J. L. Barnett, G. M. Cronin, T. H. McCallum, "Effects of grouping unfamiliar adults pigs after dark, after treatment with amperozide and by using pens with stalls, on aggression, skin lesions and plasma cortisol concentrations", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 121-133, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(96)01084-2
  14. M. A. W. Ruis, J. H. A. Brake, B. Engel, E. D. Ekkel, W. G. Buist, H. J. Blokhuis, J. M. Koolhaas, "The circadian rhythm of salivary cortisol in growing pigs: effects of age, gender, and stress", Physiology & Behavior, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 623-630, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(97)00177-7
  15. K. H. Kim, K. S. Kim, D. W. Kim, S. J. Sa, Y. H. Kim, "Evaluation of valid time for analysis of complete blood cell in pig blood using the Hemavet 950FS", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 194-201, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.1.194
  16. A. C. A. Fagundes, J. A. Negrao, R. G. Silva, J. D. F. Gomes, L. W. O. Souza, R. S. Fukushima, "Environmental temperature and serum cortisol levels in growing-finishing pigs" Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, Sao Paulo, vol. 45, suplemento, pp. 136-140, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/S1413-95962008000700019
  17. S. Y. Oh, Y. D. Jeong, D. W. Kim, Y. J. Min, D. J. Yu, K. H. Kim, Y. H. Kim, "Effect of heat stress on growth performance and physiological changes of pigs in commercial farm", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 130-139, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.7.130
  18. H. A. Van de Weerd, C. M. Docking, J. E. L. Day, S. A. Edwards, "The development of harmful social behaviour in pigs with intact tails and different enrichment backgrounds in two housing systems", Animal Science, vol. 80, pp. 289-298, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/ASC40450289
  19. H. A. Van de Weerd, C. M. Docking, J. E. L. Day, P. J. Avery, S. A. Edwards, "A systematic approach towards developing environmental enrichment for pigs", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 101-118, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00150-3
  20. J. E. L. Day, H. A. M. Spoolder, A. Burfoot, H. L. Chamberlain, S. A. Edwards, "The separate and interactive effects of handling and environmental enrichment on the behaviour and welfare of growing pigs" Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 177-192, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(01)00199-X
  21. K. Scott, L. Taylor, B. P. Gill, S. A. Edwards, "Influence of different types of environmental enrichment on the behaviour of finishing pigs in two different housing systems. 1. Hanging toy versus rootable substrate", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 99, no. 3-4, pp. 222-229, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.10.013
  22. K. Scott, L. Taylor, B. P. Gill, S. A. Edwards, "Influence of different types of environmental enrichment on the behaviour of finishing pigs in two different housing systems. 2. Ratio of pigs to enrichment", Applied Animal Behaviour Science, vol. 105, no. 1-3, pp. 51-58, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.042