DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment on shock pressure acquisition from underwater explosion using uncertainty of measurement

  • Moon, Seok-Jun (Dept. of System Dynamics Research, Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials) ;
  • Kwon, Jeong-Il (Dept. of System Dynamics Research, Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials) ;
  • Park, Jin-Woo (Dept. of System Dynamics Research, Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials) ;
  • Chung, Jung-Hoon (Dept. of System Dynamics Research, Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials)
  • Received : 2016.12.13
  • Accepted : 2017.04.10
  • Published : 2017.11.30

Abstract

This study aims to verify experimentally the specifications of the data acquisition system required for the precise measurement of signals in an underwater explosion (UNDEX) experiment. The three data acquisition systems with different specifications are applied to compare their precision relatively on maximum shock pressures from UNDEX. In addition, a method of assessing the acquired signals is suggested by introducing the concept of measurement uncertainty. The underwater explosion experiments are repeated five times under same conditions, and assessment is conducted on maximum quantities acquired from underwater pressure sensors. It is confirmed that the concept of measurement uncertainty is very useful method in accrediting the measurement results of UNDEX experiments.

Keywords

References

  1. Bradley, M., 1991. Environmental Acoustics Pocket Handbook. AEAS Report, pp. 91-101.
  2. Chen, Y., Tong, Z.P., Hua, H.X., Wang, Y., Gou, H.Y., 2009. Experimental investigation on the dynamic response of scaled ship model with rubber sandwich coatings subjected to underwater explosion. Int. J. Impact Eng. 36, 318-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2007.12.015
  3. Cole, R.H., 1948. Underwater Explosions. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  4. ISO, 2011. Uncertainty of Measurement - Part 3: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. ISO/IEC Guide 98-3/Suppl. 2. http://www.iso.org (Accessed 10 December 2016).
  5. JCGM 100, 2008. Evaluation of Measurement Data - Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. JCGM Member Organization (Accessed 10 December 2016).
  6. Korean Register, 2014. Control of Ship Vibration and Noise, third ed., pp. 987-1041 (in Korean).
  7. Kwon, J.I., Chung, J.J., Moon, S.J., Jung, B.C., Park, J.W., 2015. Study for effective shock analysis methodology with UNDEX experimental data using down scale ship model. In: 86th Shock and Vibration Symposium, October, Orlando.
  8. Kwon, J.I., Chung, J.J., Moon, S.J., Park, J.W., Jeong, J.A., 2016. Comparative study on the response to shock analysis with UNDEX experimental data using down scale ship model. In: 87th Shock and Vibration Symposium, October, New Orleans.
  9. Mair, Hans U., Reese, Ronald M., 1999. Simulated Ship Shock Tests/Trials? http://www.ida.org/LFTEsimulation (Accessed 10 December 2016).
  10. National Instruments Corporation, 2016a. Data Sheet NI 9234. http://www.ni.com (Accessed 10 December 2016).
  11. National Instruments Corporation, 2016b. Device Specification NI PXIe-5160. http://www.ni.com (Accessed 10 December 2016).
  12. National Instruments Corporation, 2016c. NI 449x Specifications. http://www.ni.com (Accessed 10 December 2016).
  13. Park, I.K., Cho, D.S., Kim, J.C., 2003a. Development of measurement system for the underwater explosion shock test of naval ships. J. Soc. Nav. Archit. Korea 40, 66-74 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.3744/SNAK.2003.40.4.066
  14. Park, I.K., Kim, J.C., Ahn, C.W., Cho, D.S., 2003b. Measurement of naval ship responses to underwater explosion shock loadings. Shock Vib. 10, 365-377. https://doi.org/10.1155/2003/803475
  15. PCB Piezotronics Inc., 2016. Model W138A10/ICP Pressure Sensor Installation and Operation Manual. Document Number 21354, Revision B. http://www.pcb.com (Accessed 10 December 2016).
  16. Satterthwaite, F.E., 1946. An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biom. Bull. 2, 110-114. https://doi.org/10.2307/3002019
  17. Wang, H., Zhu, X., Cheng, Y.S., Liu, J., 2014. Experimental and numerical investigation of ship structure subjected to close-in underwater shock wave and following gas bubble pulse. Mar. Struct. 39, 90-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2014.07.003
  18. Wilson, W., 1960. Speed of sound in sea water as a function of T, P, and salinity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 38, 641.

Cited by

  1. Visualization of shock wave propagation due to underwater explosion vol.23, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-020-00664-9
  2. Dynamic and whipping response of the surface ship subjected to underwater explosion: experiment and simulation vol.15, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2019.1706924
  3. Experimental and numerical investigations of near-field underwater explosions vol.77, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.77.3.395
  4. Advanced Development of Sensors’ Roles in Maritime-Based Industry and Research: From Field Monitoring to High-Risk Phenomenon Measurement vol.11, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093954