Therapeutic Science for Rehabilitation (재활치료과학)

Korean Society of Neurological Occupational Therapy (대한신경계작업치료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Systematic Review of Assessment Tools of Activities of Daily Living for Stroke Patients

뇌졸중 환자를 위한 일상생활활동 평가도구에 관한 체계적 고찰

  • Kang, Jae-Won (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Ji-Hyuk (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Science, Yonsei University)
  • 강재원 (연세대학교 대학원 작업치료학과) ;
  • 박지혁 (연세대학교 보건과학대학 작업치료학과)
  • Received : 2017.08.02
  • Accepted : 2017.08.18
  • Published : 2017.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was conducted to systematic review about assessment tools for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for stroke patients. Methods: Studies tools was administered by using four electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and NDSL). For the main key words,"stroke AND activities of daily living AND occupational therapy AND assessment OR evaluation OR measurement"was used. We analyzed the types and frequency of evaluation tools. In addition, the evaluation tools for activities and participation were classified based on the classification criteria of International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Results: In this study, 111 studies were analyzed and 30 assessment tools were identified. As the number of studies on stroke patients has been increased recently, the types and frequency of evaluation tools have been also increased. The most commonly used evaluation tools were Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Barthel Index (BI) and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). In addition, according to classification based on ICF, we found that the types of assessment tools which assess participation were few. Conclusion: Although there were many kinds of assessment tools, the types of evaluation tools which were used in the research or field were very limited. Using various assessment tools, more research should be conducted to support evidence-based occupational therapy. Evaluation tools for participation also should be developed.

목적: 본 연구는 뇌졸중 환자를 위한 일상생활활동 평가도구에 관해 체계적 고찰함으로써 임상 및 연구에서 자료로 활용되고자 하였다. 연구방법: 2001년부터 2016년까지 학회지에 게재된 논문을 검색하기 위하여 Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane, NDSL 데이터베이스를 사용하여"stroke AND activities of daily living AND occupational therapy AND assessment OR evaluation OR measurement"를 검색하여 체계적 고찰을 하였다. 평가도구의 종류와 사용빈도를 분석한 후 이에 대한 경향을 파악하였다. 또한 국제 기능 장애 건강 분류(International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health; ICF) 모델의 분류 기준에 맞추어 활동과 참여에 대한 평가도구를 분류하였다. 결과: 총 111개의 논문이 최종적으로 분석되었으며, 30개의 평가도구가 확인되었다. 최근 들어 뇌졸중 환자를 대상으로 한 연구 게재편수가 증가함에 따라 평가도구의 종류와 사용빈도가 증가하였다. 가장 많이 사용되는 평가도구는 기능적 독립성 측정(Functional Independence Measure; FIM), 바델 지수(Barthel Index; BI)와 캐나다작업수행측정(Canadian Occupational Performance Measure; COPM)이었다. ICF 모델의 분류 기준에 따라 분석한 결과 대부분의 도구는 활동에 대한 평가도구로 참여에 대한 평가도구 수는 매우 적었다. 결론: 본 연구는 뇌졸중 환자의 일상생활활동 수행능력을 측정하기 위해 사용된 평가도구를 체계적으로 고찰하였다. 연구 결과 FIM, BI와 같은 특정한 도구가 많이 사용되었다. 앞으로는 평가도구의 특성에 맞춰 적절한 평가가 이루어 질 수 있도록 다양한 평가도구를 사용한 연구가 진행되어 근거기반의 작업치료를 뒷받침 해 주어야 한다. 또한 ICF 모델의 분류 기준 중 참여에 대한 평가도구의 개발이 이루어져야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Arbesman, M., Scheer, J., & Lieberman, D. (2008). Using AOTA's critically appraised topic (CAT) and critically appraised paper (CAP) series to link evidence to practice. OT Practice, 13(5), 18-22.
  2. Arnadottir, G. (1990). The brain and behavior: Assessing cortical dysfunction through activities of daily living. St. Louis: The C. V. Mosby Company.
  3. Arnadottir, G. (2010). Measuring the impact on body functions on occupational performance: Validation of the ADL-focused Occupation-based Neurobehavioral Evaluation (A-ONE). UmeaUniversity Medical Dissertations, New series No.1322. Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation/Occupational Therapy, UmeaUniversity, Umea, Sweden.
  4. Arnadottir, G., Lofgren, B., & Fisher, A. G. (2010). Difference in impact of neurobehavioural dysfunction on activities of daily living performance between right and left hemispheric stroke. Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 42(10), 903-907. doi:10.2340/16501977-0621
  5. Barreca, S. R., Stratford, P. W., Lambert, C. L., Masters, L. M., & Streiner, D. L. (2005). Test-retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chedoke arm and hand activity inventory: A new measure of upper-limb function for survivors of stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 86(8), 1616-1622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.017
  6. Choi, M. A. (2013). Relationship between post-stroke fatigue and daily activities(Master's thesis). Ajou University, Suwon.
  7. Choi, Y. J., & Jung, M. Y. (2015). Systematic review on the assessment tool of school participation with elementary school children. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science, 54(3), 311-325. doi:10.15870/jsers.2015.09.54.3.311
  8. Collen, F. M., Wade, D. T., Robb, G. F., & Bradshaw, C. M. (1991). The Rivermead mobility index: A further development of the Rivermead motor assessment. International disability studies, 13(2), 50-54. https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799109166684
  9. Drummond, A. E. R., & Walker, M. F. (1994). The Nottingham Leisure Questionnaire for stroke patients. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57, 414-418. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269405701102
  10. Duncan, P. W., Wallace, D., Lai, S. M., Johnson, D., Embretson, S., & Laster, L. J. (1999). The stroke impact scale version 2.0 evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke, 30(10), 2131-2140. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2131
  11. Dutil, E., Bottari, C., Vanier, M., & Gaudreault, C. (2005). ADL Profile: Description of the instrument. Montreal: Les Editions Emersion.
  12. Fisher, A, G. (1995). Assessment of motor and process skills (1sted.). Colorado USA: Fort Collins, Three Star Press.
  13. Gardarsdottir, S., & Kaplan, S. (2002). Validity of the Arnadottir OT-ADL Neurobehavioral Evaluation (A-ONE): Performance in activities of daily living and neurobehavioral impairments of persons with left and right hemisphere damage. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(5), 499-508. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.5.499
  14. Hebert, R., Carrier, R., & Bilodeau, A. (1988). The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF): Description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. Age and ageing, 17(5), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/17.5.293
  15. Holbrook, M., & Skilbeck, C. (1983). An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age and ageing, 12(2), 166-170. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/12.2.166
  16. Jo, A. Y., & Kim, J. M. (2012). The effects of computer-based cognitive rehabilitation program(CoTras) for visual perception and ADL in stroke. The Journal of Korean Society of Community Based Occupational Therapy, 2(1), 49-63.
  17. Jones, F., Partridge, C., & Reid, F. (2008). The Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire: measuring individual confidence in functional performance after stroke. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(7b), 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02333.x
  18. Jung, H. Y., Kim, K. M., & Chang, M. Y. (2009). Measurement tools for occupational therapy for stroke patients: A systematic review. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 17(3), 79-95.
  19. Kang, D. H., Noh, C. S., Ji, S. Y., Kim, J. K., Lee, T. Y., & Park, S. Y. (2005). A correlation between the canadian occupational performance measure and the assessment of motor and process skills : A pilot study. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 13(1), 25-35.
  20. Keith, R. A., Granger, C. V., Hamilton, B. B., & Sherwin, F. S. (1987). The functional independence measure. Advances in Clinical Rehabilitation 1, 6-18.
  21. Kim, Y. G. (2015). The effect of the virtual reality rehabilitation system on activities of daily living, cognitive function, self-esteem in stroke. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 16, 5476-5484. doi:10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.8.5476
  22. Klein, R. M., & Bell, B. (1982). Self-care skills: Behavioral measurement with Klein-Bell ADL scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 63(7), 335-338.
  23. Ko, H. E., Oh, M. H., Baek, J. Y., & Lee, J. S. (2012). The relationship between body functions and activities and the participation of community-dwelling elderly persons: Based on ICF. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 20(4), 15-28.
  24. Ko, M. S., Jeon, H. S., & Hwang, S. (2015). Effects of Group Task-Oriented Circuit Training on Motor Function, ADLs and Quality of Life in Individuals with Chronic Stroke: A Case Study. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 16, 1894-1903. doi:10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.3.1894
  25. Law, M., Baptiste, S., McColl, M., Opzoomer, A., Polatajko, H., & Pollock, N. (1990). The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: An outcome measure for occupational therapy. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(2), 82-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841749005700207
  26. Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9(3), 179-186. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179
  27. Mahoney, F. I. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61-65.
  28. Martini, R., & Polatajko, H. J. (1998). Verbal self-guidance as a treatment approach for children with developmental coordination disorder: A systematic replication study. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 18(4), 157-181.
  29. Nouri, F. M., & Lincoln, N. B. (1987). An extended activities of daily living scale for stroke patients. Clinical Rehabilitation, 1(4), 301-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/026921558700100409
  30. Park, J. H (2010). Activities of daily living. Seoul, Korea: Hyunmoon.
  31. Rankin J. (1957). Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. Scottish Medical Journal, 2, 200-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/003693305700200504
  32. Rexroth, P., Fisher, A. G., Merritt, B. K., & Gliner, J. (2005). ADL differences in individuals with unilateral hemispheric stroke. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 72(4), 212-221. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740507200403
  33. Rogers, J. C., & Holm, M. B. (1989). Performance assessment of self-care skills. Unpublished performance test, University of Pittsburgh.
  34. Shah, S., Vanclay, F., & Cooper, B. (1989). Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42(8), 703-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6
  35. Sonn, U., & Svensson, E. (1997). Measures of individual and group changes in ordered categorical data: Application to the ADL staircase. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 29(4), 233-242.
  36. Studenski, S., Duncan, P. W., Perera, S., Reker, D., Lai, S. M., & Richards, L. (2005). Daily functioning and quality of life in a randomized controlled trial of therapeutic exercise for subacute stroke survivors. Stroke, 36(8), 1764-1770. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000174192.87887.70
  37. Taub, E., Miller, N. E., Novack, T. A., Cook 3rd, E. W., Fleming, W. C., Nepomuceno, C. S., ... & Crago, J. E. (1993). Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabil itation, 74(4), 347-354.
  38. Trombly, C. A., & Radomski, M. V. (2008). Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  39. Washburn, R. A., Zhu, W., McAuley, E., Frogley, M., & Figoni, S. F. (2002). The physical activity scale for individuals with physical disabilities: Development and evaluation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(2), 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.27467
  40. Williams, J. H., Drinka, T. J., Greenberg, J. R., Farrell-Holtan, J., Euhardy, R., & Schram, M. (1991). Development and testing of the Assessment of Living Skills and Resources (ALSAR) in elderly community-dwelling veterans. The Gerontologist, 31(1), 84-91. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/31.1.84
  41. Won, C. W., Yang, K. Y., Rho, Y. G., Kim, S. Y., Lee, E. J., Yoon, J. L., ... & Yoon, D. K. (2002). The development of Korean Activities of Daily Living (K-ADL) and Korean Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (K-IADL) scale. Journal of the Korean Geriatrics Society, 6(2), 107-120.
  42. World Health Organization. (2001). World health organization International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Greneva: World Health Organization.
  43. Yoo, E. Y., Jung, M. Y., Park, S. Y., & Choi, E. H. (2006). Current trends of occupational therapy assessment tool by Korean occupational therapist. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 14(3), 27-37.
  44. You, Y. Y., & Ann, C. S. (2009). A study of the relationships between perceived rehabilitation - motivation and quality of life in patients after a cerebrovascular accident. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 17(2), 1-16.

Cited by

  1. 뇌졸중 환자에서 한손 및 양손 활동 수행 시 가속도 분석 vol.10, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.22683/tsnr.2021.10.1.129