DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Changes in the Ecological Toxic Effects of the Contaminated Sediment of Singapore after Treatment

싱가포르 오염준설토 정화 후 생태 독성 변화

  • Jho, Eun Hea (Department of Environmental Science, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) ;
  • Yun, Seong Ho (Department of Environmental Science, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) ;
  • Hwang, Sun Kyung (Department of Environmental Science, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) ;
  • Lee, Sung Jong (Department of Environmental Science, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) ;
  • Kim, Hongseok (Research & Development Division, Hyundai Engineering & Construction) ;
  • Chae, Heehun (Research & Development Division, Hyundai Engineering & Construction)
  • 조은혜 (한국외국어대학교 환경학과) ;
  • 윤성호 (한국외국어대학교 환경학과) ;
  • 황선경 (한국외국어대학교 환경학과) ;
  • 이성종 (한국외국어대학교 환경학과) ;
  • 김홍석 (현대건설 연구개발본부) ;
  • 채희훈 (현대건설 연구개발본부)
  • Received : 2017.08.10
  • Accepted : 2017.09.20
  • Published : 2017.10.31

Abstract

Contaminated sediment can be treated in order to reuse the treated sediment. Even though the chemical criteria are satisfied, the treated sediment could still impose toxic effects. Therefore, this study investigated the changes in the ecological toxic effects of the contaminated sediment from the J region in Singapore after treatment. The contaminated sediment was subject to sequential soil washing and thermal treatment, followed by pH neutralization. Toxic effects of the contaminated and treated sediments were determined by using Vibrio fischeri ($Microtox^{(R)}$), Triticum aestivum (wheat), and Eisenia foetida (earthworm). After treatment, the concentrations of total petroleum hydrocarbons and heavy metals were decreased by 98% and 59-93%, respectively, and satisfied the Industrial Maximum Values of the Dutch Standard, which were used as the remedial goal. The bioluminescence reduction of V. fischeri decreased significantly, and the earthworm survival increased from 0% to 90% after treatment. The germination rate increased from $0{\pm}0%$ to $75{\pm}13%$ after treatment, but the treated sediment may need additional treatment such as nutrient addition for better plant growth. Overall, this study showed that the treatment of the contaminated sediment satisfactorily removed mixed contaminants, and this led to reduction in toxic effects, suggesting improved potentials for reuse of the treated sediment.

Keywords

References

  1. Cuong, D.T. and Obbard, J.P., 2006, Metal speciation in coastal marine sediments from Singapore using a modified BCR-sequential extraction procedure, Appl. Geochem., 21(8), 1335-1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.05.001
  2. Elgh-Dalgren, K., Arwidsson, Z., Camdzija, A., Sjoberg, R., Ribe, V., Waara, S., Allard, B., von Kronhelm, T., and van Hees, P.A., 2009, Laboratory and pilot scale soil washing of PAH and arsenic from a wood preservation site: changes in concentration and toxicity, J. Hazard. Mater., 172(2-3), 1033-1040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.092
  3. Gee, G.W. and Bauder, J.W., 1986, Particle-size Analysis1, Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 1-Physical and Mineralogical Methods, A. Klute (Ed), Wisconsin, USA.
  4. Goh, B.P.L. and Chou, L.M., 1997, Heavy metal levels in marine sediments of Singapore, Environ. Monit. Assess., 44(1), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005763918958
  5. Im, J., Yang, K., Jho, E.H., and Nam, K., 2015, Effect of different soil washing solutions on bioavailability of residual arsenic in soils and soil properties, Chemosphere, 138, 253-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.004
  6. Jho, E.H., Im, J., Yang, K., Kim, Y.-J., and Nam, K., 2015, Changes in soil toxicity by phosphate-aided soil washing: Effect of soil characteristics, chemical forms of arsenic, and cations in washing solutions, Chemosphere, 119, 1399-1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.10.038
  7. Ministry of Environment, 2009, Standard test method for soil contamination, ES 07302.1 Hydrogen ion concentration - Glass electrode method.
  8. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, 2013a, Regulations on beneficial reuse of dredged sediment.
  9. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, 2013b, Sediment Quality Guidelines (seabed sediment).
  10. National Institute of Environmental Research, 2015, Sediment Pollution Evaluation Standard.
  11. OECD, 1984, Test No. 207: Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests.
  12. OECD, 2006, Test No. 208: Terrestrial Plant Test: Seedling Emergence and Seedling Growth Test.
  13. Peng, J.-f., Song, Y.-h., Yuan, P., Cui, X.-y., and Qiu, G.-l., 2009, The remediation of heavy metals contaminated sediment, J. Hazard. Mater., 161(2), 633-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.061
  14. Plaza, G., Nalecz-Jawecki, G., Ulfig, K., and Brigmon, R.L., 2005, The application of bioassays as indicators of petroleum-contaminated soil remediation, Chemosphere, 59(2), 289-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.11.049
  15. Swartjes, F.A., Rutgers, M., Lijzen, J.P.A., Janssen, P.J.C.M., Otte, P.F., Wintersen, A., Brand, E., and Posthuma, L., 2012, State of the art of contamianted site management in The Netherlands: Policy framework and risk assessment tools, Sci. Total Environ., 427-428, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.02.078
  16. US EPA, 1996, US EAP 8015B Method: Nonhalogenated organics using GC/FID, Revision 2.
  17. US EPA, 2007, US EPA 3051A Method: Microwave assisted acid digestion of sediments, sludges, soils, and oils, Revision 1.
  18. Vidonish, J.E., Zygourakis, K., Masiello, C.A., Sabadell, G., and Alvarez, P.J.J., 2016, Thermal Treatment of Hydrocarbon-Impacted Soils: A Review of Technology Innovation for Sustainable Remediation, Eng., 2(4), 426-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2016.04.005
  19. Wuana, R.A. and Okieimen, F.E., 2011, Heavy Metals in Contaminated Soils: A Review of Sources, Chemistry, Risks and Best Available Strategies for Remediation, ISRN Ecol., 2011, 20.
  20. Zeb, B., Ping, Z., Mahmood, Q., Lin, Q., Pervez, A., Irshad, M., Bilal, M., Bhatti, Z.A., and Shaheen, S., 2017, Assessment of combined toxicity of heavy metals from industrial wastewaters on Photobacterium phosphoreum T3S, Appl. Water Sci., 7(4), 2043-2050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0385-4