DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Understanding Technology-Enhanced Construction Project Delivery: perspective from expansive learning and adaptive expertise

  • Sackey, Enoch (Project Commercial Management, MaitlandQS) ;
  • Kwadzo, Dzifa A.M. (CC&M Partnership)
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

The architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry is yet to formulate a holistic strategy to realign the evolving technological infrastructures with organisational ambitions and adaptive knowledge of the workforce. This study attempts to create an understanding of the underlying processes adopted by technology-enhanced construction organisations to disseminate and maintain knowledge within the workforce in order to keep pace with the evolving construction technologies. The study adopted expansive learning and adaptive expertise constructs to help better explain workplace learning support structures for organisational effectiveness in a turbulent situation. The two theories were tailored to empirically evaluate three case study construction organisations that have embarked on technology-enabled organisational changes. The study concluded on the creation of a facilitating workplace learning environment to enable the workforce to adapt into and resolve any inherent contradictions and cognitive ambiguities of the changing organisational conditions. This could ensure that novel and conflicting features of the emerging technologies can be adapted across the myriad multi-functional project activities in order to expand the frontiers of the technological capabilities to address the eminent issues confronting the AEC sector.

Keywords

References

  1. Leonardi, P. M. "When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies", MIS quarterly, pp. 147-167, 2011.
  2. Ehie, I.C. & Madsen, M. "Identifying critical issues in enterprise resource planning implementation", Computers in Industry, vol. 56, no. 6, pp 545-557, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2005.02.006
  3. Christensen, C.M. Anthony, S.D. & Roth, E.A. "Seeing what's next? Using theories of innovation to predict change", Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing, 2000.
  4. Van der Veen, E.J., Giannoulas, D.A., Guglielmi, M., Uunk, T. & Schubert, D. "Disruptive space technologies", International Journal of Space Technology Management and Innovation, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 24-39, 2012. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijstmi.2012070102
  5. Eastman, C.M. "Architectural CAD: A ten year assessment of the state of the art", Computer-Aided Design, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 289-292, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(89)90034-1
  6. Sackey, E., Tuuli, M.M. & Dainty, A.R. "BIM implementation: from capability maturity models to implementation strategy", in: Soetanto, R., Tsang, N., & Ahmed, A. (edns.), Sustainable Building and Construction Conference SB13, 3-6 July, Coventry University, UK, pp. 196-207, 2013.
  7. Osan, D.R., Hule, M.A., Nguyen, Q. & Gaitan, D.A. "The BIM revolution: Building information modelling expands benefits to hospital design and operations", Health Facilities Management, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 27-31, 2012.
  8. Sackey, E., Tuuli, M.M. & Dainty, A.R. "A sociotechnical alignment and innovation in construction: The case of BIM implementation in a heterogeneous context", in: Boyd, D (edn), ARCOM Doctoral Workshop, BIM Management and Interoperability, 20 June, Birmingham City University, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, pp. 33-46, 2013.
  9. Plesner, U., & Horst, M. "Before stabilization: Communication and non-standardization of 3D digital models in the building industry", Information, Communication & Society, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1115-1138, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.695387
  10. BIM Task Group Report "Building information modelling (BIM) working party strategy paper, 2011. Available at: http://www.bimtaskgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/BISBIM-strategy-Report.pdf
  11. Zack, M.H. & McKenney, J.L. "Social context and interaction in ongoing computer-supported management groups", Organisation Science vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 394-422, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.4.394
  12. Schultze, U. & Orlikowski, W.J. "A practice perspective on technology-mediated network relations: The use of internet-based self-serve technologies", Information Systems Research, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 87-106, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1030.0016
  13. Orlikowski, W.J. "Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organisations", Organisation Science, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 404-428, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
  14. Ashurst, C., Doherty, N. & Peppard, J. "Improving the impact of IT development projects: the benefits realization capability model", European Journal of Information Systems, vo. 17, no. 4, pp. 352-370, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.33
  15. Kohli, R. & Grover, V. "Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times", Journal of the Association for Information Systems, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 23-39, 2008. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00147
  16. Peppard, J. "The conundrum of IT management", European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 4 no. 16, pp. 336-345, 2007.
  17. Reich, B.H., Gemino, A. & Sauer, C. "Knowledge management and project-based knowledge in IT projects: A model and preliminary empirical results", International Journal of Project Management, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 663-674, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.12.003
  18. Kinnane, O. & West, R. "BIM education for engineers via selfdirected, creative design", International Journal of 3-D Information Modeling (IJ3DIM), vol. 2 no. 4, pp. 65-76, 2013. https://doi.org/10.4018/ij3dim.2013100106
  19. Wu, W. & Issa, R.R. "The soft side of BIM: Current practice of BIM talent acquisition in the AEC industry", In: Proceedings of bSa 2nd BIM Academic Symposium, NIBS, Washington, DC, 81-88, 2014.
  20. Schweber, L., & Harty, C. "Actors and objects: A socio-technical networks approach to technology uptake in the construction sector", Construction Management and Economics, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 657-674, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446191003702468
  21. Young, N.W., Jones, S.A., Bernstein, H.M. & Gudgel, J. "The business value of BIM: Getting building information modelling to the Bottom Line, SmartMarket Report, McGraw, 2009.
  22. Smith, D.K., Wall J. & Betts M. "ICT and curriculum design to bridge the gap between industry and academia", Proceedings of the Queensland University of Technology Research Week International Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 2005.
  23. Becerik-Gerber, B., Gerber, D.J. & Ku, K. "The pace of technological innovation in architecture, engineering, and construction education: Integrating recent trends into the curricula", Journal of Information Technology in Construction, vol. pp. 16, 411-432, 2011.
  24. Lehtinen, E., Hakkarainen, K. & Palonen, T. "Understanding learning for the professions: How theories of learning explain coping with rapid change", In: International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-based Learning, pp. 199-224, Springer Netherlands, 2014.
  25. Pring, R. "The philosophy of education", Bloomsbury Publishing, 2004.
  26. Underwood, J. & Ayoade, O. (2015) "Current position and associated challenges of BIM education in UK higher education", The High Education Academy, York.
  27. Dainty, A., Green, S. & Bagilhole, B. "People and culture in construction", Spon, London, 2007.
  28. Goodhue, D.L. & Thompson, R.L. "Task-technology fit and individual performance", MIS Quarterly, pp. 213-236, 1995.
  29. Park, Y., Son, H. & Kim, C. "Investigating the determinants of construction professionals' acceptance of web-based training: An extension of the technology acceptance model", Automation in Construction, vol. 22, pp. 377-386, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.016
  30. Engestrom, Y. Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an Activity Theoretical Reconceptualization, Journal of Education and Work, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 133-156, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
  31. Engestrom, Y. "Training for change: New approach to instruction and learning in working life", International Labour Office, Business and Economics, Geneva, 1994.
  32. Fuller, A. & Unwin, L. "Expansive learning environments: Integrating personal and organisational development. In: Evans, K., Hodkinson, P., Rainbird, H. & Unwin, L. (Edn) Improving Workplace Learning. London: Routledge, 2004.
  33. Ohlsson, S. "Deep Learning: How the Mind Overrides Experience", Cambridge University Press, New York, 2011.
  34. Kaplan, S. & Orlikowski, W.J. "Temporal work in strategy making", Organisation Science, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 965-995, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0792
  35. Feldman, M. & Orlikowski, W.J. "Theorizing practice and practicing theory", Organisation Science vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1240-1253, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0612
  36. Yin, R.K. "Case study research: Design and methods", Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1984.
  37. Herriott, R.E. & Firestone, W.A. "Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description and generalizability", Educational Researcher, pp. 14-19, 1983.
  38. Yin, R.K. "Applications of case study research", Sage, 2011.
  39. Dougherty, D. "Grounded theory building: Some principles and practices", In: Baum, J.A. (edn), Companion to Organisations, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK, pp. 849-867, 2002.
  40. Vaughan, D. "Ethnographic analytics", In: Hedstrom, P., & Bearman, P. (edns.), The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK., 2009.
  41. Kendall, J. (1999). "Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy", Western Journal of Nursing Research, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 743-757, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1177/019394599902100603
  42. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.M. "Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques", Sage Publications Inc., 1990.
  43. Ward, M. & Rhodes, C. "Small businesses and the UK economy", House of Commons Library, Economic Policy and Statistics Section, 2014.
  44. Guha, S., Grover, V., Kettinger, W. & Teng, J. "Business process change and organisational performance: Exploring an antecedent model", Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 119-154, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1997.11518156
  45. Freeman, C. & Perez, C. "Structural crisis of adjustment: Business cycles and investment behavior, In: G. Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. & Soete, L. (edn), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter Publishers. 1988.
  46. Arrow, K. "The implications of learning by doing", Review of Economic Studies, vol. 29, no. 1962, pp. 166-170, 1962.
  47. Motwani, J., Subramanian, R. & Gopalakrishna, P. "Critical factors for successful ERP implementation: Exploratory findings from four case studies", Computers in Industry, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 529-544, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2005.02.005
  48. Anthony, G., Hunter, R., & Thompson, Z. "Expansive learning: Lessons from one teacher's learning journey", International Journal on Mathematics Education, ZDM, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 279-291, 2014.
  49. Whyte, J., & Sexton, M. "Motivations for innovation in the built environment: New directions for research", Building Research & Information, vol. 39 no. 5, pp. 473-482, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2011.592268
  50. Korkmaz, S,. Miller, V. & Weida, S. "Assessing key dimensions to effective innovation implementation in interorganisational project teams: an Integrated Project Delivery case." Engineering Project Organisation Journal, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17-30, 2012.
  51. Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. "Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges", Educational research review, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-24, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002
  52. Raufaste, E., Eyrolle, H., & Marine, C., "Pertinence generation in radiological diagnosis: Spreading activation and the nature of expertise", Cognitive Science, vol. 22, pp. 517-546, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2204_4
  53. Frenkel-Brunswik, E., "Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional perceptual personality variable", Journal of Personality, vol. 18, pp. 108-143, 1948.
  54. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L. & Hakkarainen, K. "Modelling innovative knowledge communities: A knowledge-creation approach to learning", Review of Educational Research, vol. 74, pp. 557-576. 2004. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074004557
  55. Gott, S., Hall, P., Pokorny, A., Dibble, E., & Glaser, R. "A naturalistic study of transfer: Adaptive expertise in technical domains", In D. Detterman & R. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction, pp. 258-288, 1992, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  56. Crawford, V. M., Schlager, M., Toyama, Y., Riel, M., & Vahey, P. "Characterizing adaptive expertise in science teaching", In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pp. 1-26, April 11-15, 2005.
  57. Engestrom, Y. "Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research", Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit, 1987.
  58. Denis, D., Lortie, M., St-Vincent, M., Gonella, M., Plamondon, A., Delisle, A., Tardif, J. "Participatory training in manual handling - Theoretical foundations and proposed approach. Montreal: IRSST, Report R-784, 2013
  59. Laberge, M., MacEachen, E., & Calvet, B. "Why are occupational health and safety training approaches not effective? Understanding young worker learning processes using an ergonomic lens", Safety Science, 68, pp. 250-257, vol. 68, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.04.012
  60. Cebrian, G., Grace, M., & Humphris, D. "Organisational learning towards sustainability in higher education", Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 285-306, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-12-2012-0043
  61. Milligan, C., Fontana, R.P., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2015). Self-regulated learning behaviour in the finance industry. Journal of Workplace Learning, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 387-402, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-02-2014-0011
  62. Hayden, H.E., & Chiu, M.M. "Reflective teaching via a problem exploration-teaching adaptations-resolution cycle: A mixed methods study of preservice teachers' reflective notes", Journal of Mixed Methods Research, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 133-153, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813509027
  63. Yoon, S.A., Koehler-Yom, J., Anderson, E., Lin, J., & Klopfer, E. "Using an adaptive expertise lens to understand the quality of teachers' classroom implementation of computer-supported complex systems curricula in high school science", Research in Science & Technological Education, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 237-251, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1031099
  64. Bohle Carbonell, K., Konings, K.D., Segers, M., & van Merrienboer, J.J. "Measuring adaptive expertise: development and validation of an instrument", European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 167-180, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1036858
  65. De Arment, S.T. Understanding the problem solving approaches of special educators through the lens of adaptive expertise, Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University, 2016.
  66. Harteis, C., & Billett, S. (2008). "The workplace as learning environment", International Journal of Educational Research, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 209-212, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2008.07.002