Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제30권12호
  • /
  • Pages.1751-1755
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Blood haematology, muscle pH and serum cortisol changes in pigs with different levels of drip loss

  • Koomkrong, Nunyarat (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University) ;
  • Boonkaewwan, Chaiwat (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University) ;
  • Laenoi, Watchara (Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Phayao) ;
  • Kayan, Autchara (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University)
  • 투고 : 2017.01.21
  • 심사 : 2017.05.24
  • 발행 : 2017.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: An experiment was conducted to study the blood haematology, muscle pH, and serum cortisol changes in pigs with different levels of drip loss. Methods: Two groups (low and high) of 20 animals were selected from 100 pigs based on drip loss. All [$Duroc{\times}(Large\;White{\times}Landrace)$] pigs were slaughtered according to standard slaughtering procedures. At exsanguinations, blood samples were taken for the haematological parameters and serum cortisol analysis. The muscle samples were taken from longissimus dorsi muscle to evaluate the muscle pH and drip loss. Results: Haematological parameters of low drip loss group showed higher content of white blood cells and monocytes than high drip loss group (p<0.05). The low drip loss group had higher muscle pH at 45 min (p<0.05) and 24 h (p<0.001) post-mortem than the high drip loss group. However, there was no significant difference in serum cortisol levels (p>0.05). Conclusion: Drip loss is mainly affected by the muscle pH decline after slaughter and also might be affected by white blood cells and monocytes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Joo ST, Kim GD, Hwang YH, Ryu YC. Control of fresh meat quality through manipulation of muscle fiber characteristics. Meat Sci 2013;95:828-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.044
  2. den Hertog-Meischke MJA, van Laack RJLM, Smulders FJM. The water-holding capacity of fresh meat. Vet Quart 1997;19:175-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.1997.9694767
  3. Huff-Lonergan E, Lonergan SM. New frontiers in understanding drip loss in pork: recent insights on the role of postmortem muscle biochemistry. J Anim Breed Genet 2007;124:19-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00683.x
  4. Zelechowska E, Przybylski W, Jaworska D, Sante-Lhoutellier V. Technological and sensory pork quality in relation to muscle and drip loss protein profiles. Eur Food Res Technol 2012;234:883-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-012-1705-z
  5. Braden KW. Converting muscle to meat: the physiology of rigor. In: Kerth CR, editor. The science of meat quality. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2013. p. 79-97.
  6. Adzitey F, Nurul H. Pale soft exudative (PSE) and dark firm dry (DFD) meats: causes and measures to reduce these incidences - a mini review. Int Food Res J 2011;18:11-20.
  7. Etim NN, Enyenihi GE, Williams ME, Udo MD, Offiong EEA. Haematological parameters: indicators of the physiological status of farm animals. Br J Sci 2013;10:33-45.
  8. Etim NN, Williams ME, Akpabio U, Offiong EEA. Haematological parameters and factors affecting their values. Agric Sci 2014;2:37-47.
  9. Wolmarans WJ. The effect of transport on live weight loss, meat quality and blood haematology in slaughter ostriches [master's thesis]. Stellenbosch, ZA: University of Stellenbosch; 2011.
  10. Giammarco M, Vignola G, Mazzone G, Fusaro I, Lambertini L. Haematological parameters as indicators of transport stress in rabbits. In: Proceedings 10th World Rabbit Congress; 2012 Sep 3-6; Sharm El Sheikh, EG: World Rabbit Science Association; 2012. p. 1033-7.
  11. Scope A, Filip T, Gabler C, Resch F. The influence of stress from transport and handling on hematologic and clinical chemistry blood parameters of racing pigeons (Columba livia domestica). Avian Dis 2002;46:224-9. https://doi.org/10.1637/0005-2086(2002)046[0224:TIOSFT]2.0.CO;2
  12. Skrlep M, Prevolnik M, Segula B, Candek-Potokar M. Association of plasma stress markers at slaughter with carcass or meat quality in pigs. Slov Vet Res 2009;46:133-42.
  13. Averos X, Herranz A, Sanchez R, Comella JX, Gosalvez LF. Serum stress parameters in pigs transported to slaughter under commercial conditions in different seasons. Vet Med Czech 2007;52:333-42.
  14. Pighin DG, Cunzolo SA, Zimerman M, et al. Impact of adrenaline or cortisol injection on meat quality development of Merino hoggets. J Integr Agric 2013;12:1931-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60630-9
  15. Dokmanovic M, Baltic MZ, Duric J, et al. Correlations among stress parameters, meat and carcass quality parameters in pigs. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015;28:435-41. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0322
  16. Choe JH, Kim BC. Association of blood glucose, blood lactate, serum cortisol levels, muscle metabolites, muscle fiber type composition, and pork quality traits. Meat Sci 2014;97:137-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.01.024
  17. Honikel KO, Kim CJ, Hamm R. Sarcomere shortening of prerigor muscles and its influence on drip loss. Meat Sci 1986;16:267-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(86)90038-0
  18. Adenkola AY, Ayo JO, Sackey AKB, Adelaiye AB. Haematological and serum biochemical changes in pigs administered with ascorbic acid and transported by road for four hours during the harmattan season. J Cell Anim Biol 2009;3:21-8.
  19. Oluwole OO, Omitogun GO. Haematological traits of Nigerian indigenous pig and its hybrid (50% Large White $\times$ 50 NIP) at post weaning ages. Am J Mol Biol 2016;6:45-52.
  20. Hambrecht E, Eissen JJ, Nooijen RIJ, et al. Preslaughter stress and muscle energy largely determine pork quality at two commercial processing plants. J Anim Sci 2004;82:1401-9. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.8251401x
  21. Morrow-Tesch J, Andersson G. Immunological and hematological characterizations of the wasting pig syndrome. J Anim Sci 1994;72:976-83. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.724976x
  22. Ryu YC, Kim BC. The relationship between muscle fiber characteristics, postmortem metabolic rate, and meat quality of pig longissimus dorsi muscle. Meat Sci 2005;71:351-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.015
  23. Scheffler TL, Gerrard DE. Mechanisms controlling pork quality development: the biochemistry controlling postmortem energy metabolism. Meat Sci 2007;77:7-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.024
  24. Huff-Lonergan E, Lonergan SM. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: the role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci 2005;71:194-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.022
  25. Apple JK, Yancey JWS. Water-holding capacity of meat. In: Kerth CR, editor. The science of meat quality. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2013. p. 119-45.
  26. Foury A, Lebret B, Chevillon P, et al. Alternative rearing systems in pigs: consequences on stress indicators at slaughter and meat quality. Animal 2011;5:1620-5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111000784
  27. Peres LM, Bridi AM, da Silva CA, et al. Effect of low or high stress in pre-slaughter handling on pig carcass and meat quality. R Bras Zootec 2014;43:363-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982014000700004
  28. Shaw FD, Trout GR, McPhee CP. Plasma and muscle cortisol measurements as indicators of meat quality and stress in pigs. Meat Sci 1995;39:237-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(94)P1824-F
  29. McKay LI, Cidlowski JA. Pharmacokinetics of corticosteroids. In: Kufe DW, Pollock RE, Weichselbaum RR, et al., editors. Holland-frei cancer medicine. 6th ed. Hamilton, New Zealand: BC Decker; 2003.
  30. Dalin AM, Magnusson U, Häggendal J, Nyberg L. The effect of transport stress on plasma levels of catecholamines, cortisol, corticosteroidbinding globulin, blood cell count, and lymphocyte proliferation in pigs. Acta Vet Scand 1993;34:59-68.

피인용 문헌

  1. Identifying Physiological Stress Biomarkers for Prediction of Pork Quality Variation vol.10, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040614