DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison on Sanitary and Nutritional Characteristics Between Skipjack Tuna Ktsuwonus pelamis Frame and Commercial Beef Bone Extract Concentrates

어류 프레임 농축액과 시판 사골 농축액의 위생적 및 영양적 특성 비교

  • Lim, Chi-Won (Food Safety and Processing Research Division, National Institute of Fisheries Science) ;
  • Sung, Sang Wook (Food Business Unit, Strategy Planning Division) ;
  • Heu, Min Soo (Department of Food and Nutrition, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Tae-Gee (Departmanet of Hotel Cuisine & Baking, Jeonnam Provincial College) ;
  • Kim, Jin-Soo (Research Center for Industrial Development of Seafood, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 임치원 (국립수산과학원 식품위생가공과) ;
  • 성상욱 (대상 중앙연구소) ;
  • 허민수 (경상대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 이태기 (전남도립대학교 호텔조리제빵과) ;
  • 김진수 (경상대학교 수산식품산업화 기술지원센터)
  • Received : 2017.07.24
  • Accepted : 2017.09.16
  • Published : 2017.10.31

Abstract

There is increasing interest in developing flavor-enriched concentrate using byproducts of skipjack tuna Ktsuwonus pelamis as a replacement for commercial beef bone extract concentrate (CBB-EC). This study was compared on sanitary and nutritional characteristics between skipjack tuna frame extract concentrate (ST-EC) and CBB-EC as a control of skipjack tuna frame extract concentrate. The moisture contents of CBB-EC and ST-EC 41.4-4.9% and 45.3%, respectively. The results of viable cell counts and E. coli assays suggested that CBB-EC and ST-EC is a safe and sanitary for use in food. There were no differences in peroxide values among CBB-ECs. The total amino acid contents in CBB-EC and ST-EC were 25.6-29.3 g/100 g and 37.9 g/100 g, respectively, and the major amino acids present glutamic acid, proline, glycine, alanine and arginine. Regardless of kinds of the mineral, mineral contents of ST-EC higher than those of CBB-EC. The major fatty acids were 16:0, 18:0 and 18:1n-9 in CBB-EC, 16:0, 18:1n-9 and 22:6n-3 in ST-EC. These results can be used as background information to develop flavor-enriched concentrates from byproducts of skipjack tuna as replacement for CBB-EC.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC., U.S.A., 69-74.
  2. AOCS. 1990. AOCS Official Method Ce 1b-89. In Official methods and recommended practice of the AOCS, 4th ed., AOCS, Champaign, IL, U.S.A.
  3. APHA. 1970. Recommended Procedures for the Bacteriological Examination of Sea Water and Shellfish. 4th ed. APHA (The American Public Health Association) Inc. New York, U.S.A., 28-47.
  4. Bligh EG and Dyer WJ. 1959. A rapid method of lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 37, 911-917. https://doi.org/10.1139/y59-099
  5. Cohen-Solal PL and Glimacher MJ. 1978. Organic phosphorus distribution in chicken bone matrix. Ann Biol Anim Bioc Biophys 32, 520-523.
  6. Hiromi S and Kinji E. 1990. Changes of amino acids and ATPralated compounds in chicken muscle during storage and their relationship to the taste of chicken soup. J Home Economic Japan 41, 933-938.
  7. Iwasaki M and Harada R. 1985. Proximate and amino acid composition of the roe and muscle of selected marine species. J Food Sci 50, 1585-1587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1985.tb10539.x
  8. Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Conclusion. 2002. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition. United nations university, Geneva, Switzerland, 144-146.
  9. Ji SG, Koo JG, Kwon JS, Han BW, Kim HJ, Heu MS and Kim JS. 2009. Preparation conditions of extracts from salmon frame using an autoclave. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci 42, 307-315. http://dx.doi.10.5657/kfas.2009.42.4.307.
  10. Keiko H, Setsuko A, Fujiko Y, Ikuko K and Yukiko T. 1981. Effect of heating rate (slow and fast) on physical and chemical properties of cooked chicken leg meat and soup. J Home Economic Japan 32, 515-519.
  11. Kim HJ, Kim MJ, Kim KH, Ji SJ, Lim KH, Park KH, Shin JH, Heu MS and Kim JS. 2012. Comparison of food components in various parts of white muscle from cooked skipjack tuna Katsuwonus pelamis as a source of a diet foods. Korean J Fish Aquat Sci 45, 307-316. http://dx.doi.10.5657/kfas.2012.0307.
  12. Kim JS and Park JW. 2004. Characterization of acid-soluble collagen from Pacific whiting surimi processing byproducts. J Food Sci 69, 637-642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2004.tb09912.x
  13. Kim JS, Yeum DM, Kang HG, Kim IS, Kong CS, Lee TG and Heu MS. 2002. Fundamentals and Applications for Canned Foods. Hyoil Publsihing Co., Seoul, Korea, 276-277.
  14. Kim KH. 2014. Concentration and risk assessment of heavy metal in mainly consumed fishes. MS thesis Gyeongsang National University, Tongyeong, Korea. 23-58.
  15. Mariko T. 1991. Heat-induced effect on soluble protein in meat soup stock. J Home Economic Japan 42, 967-972.
  16. Miller GJ, Frey MR, Kunsman JE and Field RA. 1982. Bovine bone marrow lipids. J Food Sci 47, 657-665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1982.tb10144.x
  17. MFDS (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety). 2017. Food Code. 1.1.5.1.2. Standards on seafoods. MFDS, Osong, Korea. Retrieved from http://www.foodsafetykorea.go.kr/foodcode/01_01.jsp on Jul 4, 2017.
  18. Okada M, Machino T and Kato S. 1988. Bone softening, a practical way to utilize small fish. Marine Fisheries Review 50, 2-7.
  19. Striker P, Benjakul S, Visessanguan W and Kijroongrojana K. 2007. Comparative studies on chemical composition and thermal properties of black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon and white shrimp Penaeus vannamei meats. Food Chem 103, 1199-1207. http://doi.org/10.1014/j.foodchem.2006.10.039.
  20. The Korean Nutrition Society. 2010. Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans 2010. Chungang Publishing Co., Seoul, Korea, 337-402.
  21. Yoo IJ, Yoo SH and Park BS. 1994. Comparison of physicochemical characteristics among han woo. Korean J Anim Sci 36, 507-514.