참고문헌
- 김호용.남광우, 2011, 공간정보 커뮤니티 활성화 방안 연구: 미국 NSDI 의 CAP 사례를 중심으로. 한국지리정보학회지, 14(1), pp.26-39. https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2011.14.1.026
- 남광우 외, 2016, '시민주도 지역혁신 플랫폼 리빙랩', 더 스마트한 도시재생, (재)부산광역시 도시재생지원센터, pp.114-126.
- 박정우.박준호.박지호.남광우, 2016, 스마트시티 서비스에서의 시민 니즈 도출 방안, 대한국토.도시계획학회 추계학술대회. pp.1-9.
- 성지은.한규영.박인용, 2016, A, 국내 리빙랩의 현황과 과제. STEPI Insight, 184, pp.1-44.
- 성지은.송위진.김종선.정서화.한규영, 2016, B, 기술사업화 촉진을 위한 리빙랩 구축 방안. STEPI Insight, 198, pp.1-39.
- 오민수, 2013, 사회성과연동채권(SIB)의 제도적 기제와 정책도구적 특성에 관한 연구: 영국 피터보로 교도소 SIB사례를 중심으로, 한국정책학회 하계학술발표 논문집, 2013(2), pp.3-31.
- Alkandari, A., Alnasheet, M., & Alshekhly, IFT., 2012, Smart cities: Survey. Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Technology Research, 2(2), pp.79-90.
- Anthopoulos, L., & Fitsilis, P., 2010, From digital to ubiquitous cities: Defining a common architecture for urban development. In Intelligent Environments (IE), 2010 Sixth International Coference on IEEE, pp. 301-306.
- Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., & Portugali, Y., 2012, Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), pp.481-518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
- Btgan, L., 2011, Smart cities and sustainability models. Informatica Economic, 15(3), pp.80-87.
- Callanan, L., Jonathan Law, J., & Mendonca, L., 2012. From Potential to Action: Bringing Social Impact Bonds to the U.S., McKinsey and Company.
- Caragliu, A., & Del Bo, C., 2012. Smartness and European urban performance: assessing the local impacts of smart urban attributes. Innovation: The European. Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), pp.97-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660323
- Castelnovo, W., Misuraca, G., & Savoldelli, A., 2015, Citizen's engagement and value co-production in smart and sustainable cities. In International conference on public policy, Milan, pp.1-16.
- Castelnovo, W., Misuraca, G., & Savoldelli, A., 2016, Smart cities governance: The need for a holistic approach to assessing urban participatory policy making. Social Science Computer Review, 34(6), pp.724-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611103
- Coe, A., Paquet, G., & Roy, J., 2001, E-governance and smart communities: a social learning challenge. Social science computer review, 19(1), pp.80-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900107
- Dameri, R. P., & Cocchia, A., 2013, Smart city and digital city: Twenty years of terminology evolution. In X Conference of the Italian Chapter of AIS, ITAIS, pp.1-8.
- Dameri, R. P., 2014, Comparing Smart and Digital City: Initiatives and Strategies in Amsterdam and Genoa. Are They Digital and/or Smart? In Smart city, Springer International Publishing, pp.45-88.
- Fox, C., & Albertson, K., 2011, Payment by results and social impact bonds in the criminal justice sector: New challenges for the concept of evidence-based policy? Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11(5), pp.395-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895811415580
- Gil-Garcia, J. R., 2012, Enacting electronic government success: An integrative study of government-wide websites, organizational capabilities, and institutions, Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
- Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., & Arribas, D., 2012, Smart cities in perspective - a comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), pp.229-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660330
- Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Wael, Y., 2011, An analytic network model for Smart cities. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on the AHP, June, pp.15-18.
- Muggah, R., Diniz, G., 2013, Digitally Enhanced Violence Prevention in the Americas. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 2(3), pp.1-23. https://doi.org/10.5334/sta.an
- Nam, T., 2012, Modeling municipal service integration: A comparative case study of New York and Philadelphia 311 systems, Dissertation, University at Albany, State University of New York.
- Schuurman, D., Baccarne, B., De Marez, L., & Mechant, P., 2012, Smart ideas for smart cities: Investigating crowdsourcing for generating and selecting ideas for ICT innovation in a city context. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 7(3), pp.49-62.
- Social Finance U.K., 2014, Peterborough Social Impact Bond Reduces Reoffending by 8.4%; Investors on Course for Payment in 2016. Social Finance U.K. (www.socialfinance.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Peterborough-First-Cohort-Results.pdf [May 10, 2015]).
- Tapscott, D., & Agnew, D., 1999, Governance in the digital economy: The importance of human development. Finance & Development, 36(4), pp.34-37.
- UNESCAP, 2007, What is good governance? . UNESCAP, http://www.unescap.org/pdd/prs/ProjectActivities/Ongoing/gg/governance.asp.
- Walravens, N., 2012, Mobile business and the smart city: Developing a business model framework to include public design parameters for mobile city services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3), pp.121-135.
- Warner, M., 2013, Private finance for public goods: social impact bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 16(4), pp.309-319.
- Winters, JV., 2011, Why are smart cities growing? Who moves and who stays. Journal of Regional Science, 51(2), pp.253-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00693.x