Journal of the Korean Regional Science Association (지역연구)

Korean Regional Science Association (한국지역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Organizational Structure and Role of Smart City Governance

스마트시티 거버넌스의 조직체계와 역할

  • 남광우 (경성대학교 공과대 건설환경도시공학부) ;
  • 박정우 (경성대학교 공과대 도시공학과) ;
  • 박준호 (경성대학교 공과대 도시공학과) ;
  • 지상태 (경성대학교 공과대 도시공학과)
  • Received : 2017.03.08
  • Accepted : 2017.03.22
  • Published : 2017.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The positive changes in urban space and urban activities resulting from the urban services provided by Smart City is not accomplished by simply creating the physical environment built on ICT but through the cooperation and participation of citizens and private sector, which is in fact key to success. In this study, this research analyzed the role and structure of smart governance, which is a system of horizontal cooperation between public and private sector, and analyze its role in developing Smart City. The study also proposes various ways to facilitate such development in each of critical categories. For this purpose, this research studied 228 smart services across 11 categories registered in the Ministry of Land and Transport in Korea to analyze the spatial distribution of smart services by spatial hierarchy and their characteristics Also, the research conducted a case study of MetroGIS, which is an information collaboration governance system for the greater area of Minneapolis and St. Paul in the state of Minnesota, United States, to explore how governance is formed; its organizational structure; the role of sub-level organization hierarchy and their interrelationship. The results of the analysis suggest that the following conditions are required to create a smart city: first, public sector resource assistance for building community; second, enhanced communication system within the community and with outside the community; securing financial stability and establishing a model of sustainable development to induce the community to evolve into a governance form.

스마트시티가 제공하는 도시서비스에 의해 발생하는 도시공간과 도시활동의 긍정적 변화는 단순히 정보통신기술로 인한 물리적 환경의 조성 때문에 이루어지는 것이 아니라 시민들과 민간영역의 협력과 참여체계가 핵심사항이라 할 수 있다. 이에 본 연구는 공공분야와 민간분야의 수평적 협력체계인 스마트 거버넌스의 구조와 역할에 대한 사례분석 및 문헌연구를 통해 스마트시티가 지향하는 '보다 스마트한 도시'로의 발전을 위한 거버넌스 역할에 대한 평가요인을 도출하고 요인별 활성화 방안을 제시하고자 한다. 이를 위해 우리나라 국토교통부에 등록된 11개 분야 228개 스마트서비스를 대상으로 공간위계별 스마트서비스의 공간적 서비스분포와 서비스의 내용적 특성을 분석하였다. 더불어 미국 미네소타주 두 도시인 Minneapolis-St. Paul권의 광역권에 형성된 공간정보협력체 형식의 거버넌스인 MetroGIS에 대한 사례분석을 통해 거버넌스의 생성과정과 조직구조, 하위 조직의 역할과 상호관계 등을 살펴보았다. 분석결과 스마트 커뮤니티의 활성화를 위해서는 우선적으로 공공분야의 지원 체계 구축이 요구되며 커뮤니티 내부 및 외부와의 소통체계나 협력체계의 고도화, 그리고 커뮤니티가 거버넌스 형태로 진화하기 위한 재정적 안정성 확보를 통해 지속가능한 모델을 정립하는 것이 필요한 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김호용.남광우, 2011, 공간정보 커뮤니티 활성화 방안 연구: 미국 NSDI 의 CAP 사례를 중심으로. 한국지리정보학회지, 14(1), pp.26-39. https://doi.org/10.11108/kagis.2011.14.1.026
  2. 남광우 외, 2016, '시민주도 지역혁신 플랫폼 리빙랩', 더 스마트한 도시재생, (재)부산광역시 도시재생지원센터, pp.114-126.
  3. 박정우.박준호.박지호.남광우, 2016, 스마트시티 서비스에서의 시민 니즈 도출 방안, 대한국토.도시계획학회 추계학술대회. pp.1-9.
  4. 성지은.한규영.박인용, 2016, A, 국내 리빙랩의 현황과 과제. STEPI Insight, 184, pp.1-44.
  5. 성지은.송위진.김종선.정서화.한규영, 2016, B, 기술사업화 촉진을 위한 리빙랩 구축 방안. STEPI Insight, 198, pp.1-39.
  6. 오민수, 2013, 사회성과연동채권(SIB)의 제도적 기제와 정책도구적 특성에 관한 연구: 영국 피터보로 교도소 SIB사례를 중심으로, 한국정책학회 하계학술발표 논문집, 2013(2), pp.3-31.
  7. Alkandari, A., Alnasheet, M., & Alshekhly, IFT., 2012, Smart cities: Survey. Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Technology Research, 2(2), pp.79-90.
  8. Anthopoulos, L., & Fitsilis, P., 2010, From digital to ubiquitous cities: Defining a common architecture for urban development. In Intelligent Environments (IE), 2010 Sixth International Coference on IEEE, pp. 301-306.
  9. Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., Ouzounis, G., & Portugali, Y., 2012, Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), pp.481-518. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01703-3
  10. Btgan, L., 2011, Smart cities and sustainability models. Informatica Economic, 15(3), pp.80-87.
  11. Callanan, L., Jonathan Law, J., & Mendonca, L., 2012. From Potential to Action: Bringing Social Impact Bonds to the U.S., McKinsey and Company.
  12. Caragliu, A., & Del Bo, C., 2012. Smartness and European urban performance: assessing the local impacts of smart urban attributes. Innovation: The European. Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), pp.97-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660323
  13. Castelnovo, W., Misuraca, G., & Savoldelli, A., 2015, Citizen's engagement and value co-production in smart and sustainable cities. In International conference on public policy, Milan, pp.1-16.
  14. Castelnovo, W., Misuraca, G., & Savoldelli, A., 2016, Smart cities governance: The need for a holistic approach to assessing urban participatory policy making. Social Science Computer Review, 34(6), pp.724-739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315611103
  15. Coe, A., Paquet, G., & Roy, J., 2001, E-governance and smart communities: a social learning challenge. Social science computer review, 19(1), pp.80-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/089443930101900107
  16. Dameri, R. P., & Cocchia, A., 2013, Smart city and digital city: Twenty years of terminology evolution. In X Conference of the Italian Chapter of AIS, ITAIS, pp.1-8.
  17. Dameri, R. P., 2014, Comparing Smart and Digital City: Initiatives and Strategies in Amsterdam and Genoa. Are They Digital and/or Smart? In Smart city, Springer International Publishing, pp.45-88.
  18. Fox, C., & Albertson, K., 2011, Payment by results and social impact bonds in the criminal justice sector: New challenges for the concept of evidence-based policy? Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11(5), pp.395-413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895811415580
  19. Gil-Garcia, J. R., 2012, Enacting electronic government success: An integrative study of government-wide websites, organizational capabilities, and institutions, Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
  20. Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., & Arribas, D., 2012, Smart cities in perspective - a comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), pp.229-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2012.660330
  21. Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Wael, Y., 2011, An analytic network model for Smart cities. In Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on the AHP, June, pp.15-18.
  22. Muggah, R., Diniz, G., 2013, Digitally Enhanced Violence Prevention in the Americas. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 2(3), pp.1-23. https://doi.org/10.5334/sta.an
  23. Nam, T., 2012, Modeling municipal service integration: A comparative case study of New York and Philadelphia 311 systems, Dissertation, University at Albany, State University of New York.
  24. Schuurman, D., Baccarne, B., De Marez, L., & Mechant, P., 2012, Smart ideas for smart cities: Investigating crowdsourcing for generating and selecting ideas for ICT innovation in a city context. Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research, 7(3), pp.49-62.
  25. Social Finance U.K., 2014, Peterborough Social Impact Bond Reduces Reoffending by 8.4%; Investors on Course for Payment in 2016. Social Finance U.K. (www.socialfinance.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Peterborough-First-Cohort-Results.pdf [May 10, 2015]).
  26. Tapscott, D., & Agnew, D., 1999, Governance in the digital economy: The importance of human development. Finance & Development, 36(4), pp.34-37.
  27. UNESCAP, 2007, What is good governance? . UNESCAP, http://www.unescap.org/pdd/prs/ProjectActivities/Ongoing/gg/governance.asp.
  28. Walravens, N., 2012, Mobile business and the smart city: Developing a business model framework to include public design parameters for mobile city services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(3), pp.121-135.
  29. Warner, M., 2013, Private finance for public goods: social impact bonds. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 16(4), pp.309-319.
  30. Winters, JV., 2011, Why are smart cities growing? Who moves and who stays. Journal of Regional Science, 51(2), pp.253-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00693.x