DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Collision Risk Perceived by Ship Operators in Ship Collision Risk Situation

선박충돌 위기상황에서 선박운항자가 지각한 충돌위험도 분석

  • Kim, Dae Sik (Department of Maritime Transportation System, Mokpo National Maritime University) ;
  • Yim, Jeong Bin (Department of Maritime Transportation System, Mokpo National Maritime University)
  • 김대식 (목포해양대학교 대학원 해상운송시스템학과) ;
  • 임정빈 (목포해양대학교 대학원 해상운송시스템학과)
  • Received : 2017.08.02
  • Accepted : 2017.09.06
  • Published : 2017.10.31

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study is to present the basic guidelines for preventing human error by measuring and analyzing the risk of collision perceived by the ship operator in the collision risk situation by using Korea Coast Guard patrol ships. Background: In the last 5 years, 97.5% of the causes of ship collision occurred at the sea was caused by human factors. However, the rate of marine accidents due to human error has not been reduced yet. Experiments and researches on the ship operators using the ships in actual operation are rarely performed. Method: Using two K.C.G Ships on the sea, the ship measured by 30 persons who are the subject of the ship (ship operator) when both ships approach and the relative distance gradually decreases in four encounter situations, perceived ship collision risk (PSCR) data were analyzed by statistical analysis. Results: The age and boarding career of the ship operator in the situation of ship collision risks encountered a negative impact on perceived collision risk in all four opposing encounter situations S1 ($000^{\circ}$), S2 ($045^{\circ}$), S3 ($090^{\circ}$) and S4 ($135^{\circ}$) respectively. That is, the higher the age of the ship operator, the lower the perceived risk of collision and the lower the age, the higher the risk of collision. Also, there was a difference between the average of group A (20~30 years) and group B (40~50 years) according to age of the ship operators at $000^{\circ}$, $045^{\circ}$ and $090^{\circ}$ and there was no difference at $135^{\circ}$. The mean difference of the experience of boarding career was also significantly different between group A (less than 4 years) and group B (more than 5 years), but there was no significant difference at $135^{\circ}$. Conclusion: The results showed that age and boarding career of the ship operators had negative impact on perceived collision risk and there was a difference in perceived risk of collision according to age and abundance of boarding career. As a result, by focusing on the ship operators who are in the age group of 20~30 years old and have less than 4 years of experience in boarding the ship. It is expected that the effect of prevention of marine accidents can be expected by avoiding collision avoidance. Application: The results of this study can be used as policy data of related organizations to prevent human error of ship operators and as training data of training institutes.

Keywords

References

  1. Acar, U., Ziarati, R. and Ziarati, M., Collisions and Groundings - Major causes of accidents at sea, 48-51, 2012, http://www.marifuture.org/Publications/Papers (retrieved May, 15, 2017).
  2. Andrew, J.B., Human Error and the Implications for Industry, posh97, 1997, http://158.132.155.107/posh97/private/Dissertation_-resources/Human_factors/Human_errors.html (retrieved July 1, 2017).
  3. Catherine, H. and Rhona, F., Safety in shipping: The human element, Journal of Safety Research, 37(4), 401-411, 2006,http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437506000818 (retrieved June 21, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2006.04.007
  4. Dhillon, B.S. and Rayapati, SN., Human Performance Reliability Modelling. Microelectronics and Reliability, 28(4), 573-580, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2714(88)90143-6
  5. Endsley, M.R., Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic System, Human Factors, 37(1), 32-64, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
  6. Inoue, K., Evaluation Method of Ship-handling Difficulty for Navigation in Restricted and congested Waterways, Journal of Navigation, 53(1), 167-180, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463399008541
  7. Ivan Ross., Perceived Risk and Consumer Behavior, 2, 1-20, 1975. https://doi.org/10.1086/208610
  8. Kim, D.S. and Yim, J.B., A Study on the Collision Risk Perception Index to OOW'S According to Vessel Encountering Situations, Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety, 22(1), 98-107, 2016. https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2016.22.1.098
  9. Korea Maritime Safety Tribunal, Statistics of Marine Casualties, Sejong. 6-28, 2017.
  10. Rasmussen, J., Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13(3), 257-266, 1983. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313160
  11. Rothblum, A.M., Human Error and Marine Safety. Semantic Scholar, 2007, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Human-Errorand-Marine-Safety-Rothblum/c8753f7b2785e73532866e94998cfe851aa8522b (retrieved June 4, 2017).
  12. Song, J.J., SPSS / AMOS statistical analysis method for writing paper, 21Century book. 2. 14-206, 2014.