Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An content analysis of facilitating and conflicting factors on the Korea's educational uses of emerging technologies and trends

신기술·트렌드의 국내 교육적 활용을 위한 촉진 및 방해 요인 분석

  • 차현진 (한양대 글로벌교육협력연구소) ;
  • 박태정 (한국외국어대 교육선진화센터) ;
  • 계보경 (한국교육학술정보원)
  • Received : 2017.09.13
  • Accepted : 2017.09.30
  • Published : 2017.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the facilitating and conflicting factors on the emerging technologies and trends predicted to impact future education in Korea. To do this, open online questionnaires on 20 emerging technologies and trends derived from a comprehensive literature review were completed by 24 experts in research, policy, schools, and corporate fields, and a content analysis of the collected qualitative data was conducted. As a result of the study, the effectiveness of the content and the maturity of technology were found to be the most important facilitating factors and obstacles. In addition, the potential for innovative teaching and learning methods and motivation, and the maturity and popularity of technology were found to be the main facilitating factors. On the other hand, health problems and negative effects on students in ethical aspects, the lack of research and development, and poor networks and infrastructures in terms of education environment were found to be the main impeding factors of emerging technologies and trends.

본 연구는 미래교육의 변화를 주도할 것으로 예측된 신기술 및 트렌드가 국내 교육현장에 활용될 수 있는 촉진 요인과 방해요인은 무엇인지를 분석하고자 하였다. 이를 위해 문헌 분석을 통해 도출된 20개 신기술 트렌드에 대하여, 총 24명의 연구, 정책, 학교 및 기업현장 전문가들을 대상으로 촉진요인과 방해요인에 대한 개방형 온라인 설문 조사를 통해 수집된 질적 자료에 대한 내용 분석을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 콘텐츠의 효과성과 기술의 성숙도가 가장 주요한 촉진요인이자 방해요인이 될 수 있는 것으로 나타났으며, 교수학습방법에서의 혁신적이고 다양한 교수 학습 방법 및 학습동기를 촉진할 수 있는 가능성, 기술의 성숙도를 비롯한 기술의 대중화와 보편성 확대가 주요한 촉진요인으로 드러났다. 반면, 윤리적 측면에서의 부작용이나 개인정보 보호, 제도적 측면에서의 낮은 부합성이나 불충분한 검증, 교육 환경 측면에서의 네트워크 및 인프라 환경 미비 등이 주요한 신기술 및 트렌드의 저해요인으로 밝혀졌다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, J. (2012). Educational application of appropriate technology in the practical arts education at the elementary school. Journal of the Elementary Education Society, 16, 139-156.
  2. Chung, J. & Kweon, S. (2001). Effective practice on network-based learning systems : A delphi study. Journal of corporate Education and Talent Research, 3, 73-105.
  3. Elo S., and H. Kyngas, H. (2008). "The qualitative content analysis process", Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  4. Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American psychologist, 49(8), 725-747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.725
  5. Gartner Group (2015). Hype Cycle for Education 2015. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/doc/3090218/hype-cycle-education-.
  6. Gartner Group (2016). Hype Cycle for Education 2016. Retrieved from https://www.gartner.com/doc/3364119/hype-cycle-education-.
  7. Grant, J. S., & Davis, L. L. (1997). Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(3), 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:3<269::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
  8. KERIS (2011). Cloud computing environment implementation for SMART education, KERIS Issue Report KR2011-22.
  9. KERIS (2011). Future School 2030 model study for the introduction of the future school system. KERIS Research Report KR2011-12.
  10. KERIS (2016). Redesigning education and emerging school models in the age of technology, KERIS Research Material KR2016-3.
  11. KERIS (2017) Policy seminar to innovate future education (responding to the 4th industrial revolution), KERIS, PM 2017-1.
  12. KERIS (2017). The educational use of IT-Convergent technology in 4th industrial revolution era. KERIS Research Report RR2016-7.
  13. Kim, C. (2014). A study on the educational use of tiny PC in an elementary school. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(1), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.1.101
  14. Kim, S., Kam, S., Kim, Y., & Lee, S. (2014). Promoting and inhibiting factors in class of graduate school using social media. Proceedings of the Korean Society for Educational Technology, 2014(1), 456-460.
  15. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage Publications: London.
  16. Kwon, Y. (2013). Data analytics in education: Current and future directions. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 19(2), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2013.19.2.087
  17. Lim, K., Kang, M., & Shin, S. (2012). The Study on Experts' Perceptions on Usage Elements of SNSs and the Investigation on the Priority of the Elements for SNSs' Educational Use through Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 925-952. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.28.4.925
  18. New Media Consortium (2014). The NMC Horizon Report: 2014 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium
  19. New Media Consortium (2014). The NMC Horizon Report: 2015 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  20. New Media Consortium (2015). The NMC Horizon Report: 2015 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium
  21. New Media Consortium (2015). The NMC Horizon Report: 2015 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  22. New Media Consortium (2016). The NMC Horizon Report: 2016 K-12 Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium
  23. New Media Consortium (2016). The NMC Horizon Report: 2015 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  24. New Media Consortium (2017). The NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  25. New Media Consortium (2017). The NMC Horizon Report: 2015 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.
  26. Patton, M. Q. (2002) Qualitative Research & Evlauation Method, Sage Publications: London.
  27. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). "Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts", International J. of artificial intelligence in education (IJAIED), 12, 8-22.
  28. Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution, World Economic Forum, Geneva: Switzerland.
  29. Sharples, M., de Roock , R., Ferguson, R., Gaved, M., Herodotou, C., Koh, E., Kukulska-Hulme, A., Looi,C-K, McAndrew, P., Rienties, B., Weller, M., Wong, L. H. (2016). Innovating Pedagogy 2016: Open University Innovation Report 5. Milton Keynes: The Open University.