DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기업의 기술경영활동이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증적 연구

An Empirical Study on the Influence of Technology Management Activities on Firm Performance

  • 정두식 (창원대학교 신산업융합학과)
  • Jung, Doo-Sig (Dept. of Advanced Industry Fusion. Changwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.09.01
  • 심사 : 2017.10.20
  • 발행 : 2017.10.28

초록

본 연구는 기술경영활동이 기업성과에 어떤 영향을 미치는지, 기업의 혁신활동이 기업경영활동과 기업성과 간의 관계에서 매개효과가 있는지 분석하여 그 연구결과를 기업실무에 적용할 수 있는지 검증해보고자 하였다. 첫째, "기술경영 활동은 기업성과에 긍정적인 정(+)의 영향을 미칠 것이다."는 가설1은 부분적으로 채택되었다. 둘째, 기술경영활동과 재무성과 간의 관계에서 제품혁신은 기술리더쉽에 완전매개효과를, 기술경영활동과 비재무성과 간의 관계에서도 제품혁신은 기술리더쉽에 완전매개효과를 가지는 것으로 확인되었다. 공정혁신의 매개효과 분석을 위하여 3단계 매개회귀분석을 실시한 결과, 기술경영활동과 재무성과 간의 관계에서 공정혁신은 기술리더쉽에 부분매개효과를 기술경영활동과 비재무성과 간의 관계에서 공정혁신은 기술리더쉽에 완전매개효과를 가지는 것으로 나타났다. 향후 연구조사 대상의 전국적인 확대와 제조업과 비제조업, 중소기업과 대기업 등으로 나누어 분석한다면 학문적 관점이나 실무적 관점에서 상당한 의미가 있을 것으로 사료된다.

The purpose of this research was to figure out how technology management activities are needed to survive in a rapidly changing business environment and how technology management activities affect company performance. First, Hypothesis 1 was partially adopted that Technology management activities will have a positive influence on management outcomes. Second, Hypothesis 2 was partially adopted that Innovation activities of firms will have mediating effects on the relationship between technology management activities and management outcomes. If the research subjects are expanded nationwide and divided into manufacturing industry, non - manufacturing industry, small and medium enterprise and large enterprise, it will be meaningful from academic point of view and practical point of view.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. J. K. Kim, "A Study on Effect of Total Quality Management on Business Performance in Korea Manufacturing," Korean Corporation Managrment Review, Vol. 16, pp. 39-57, 2002.
  2. K. S. Kim, "Causal Links from Innovative Activities to Financial Performance in Korean Manufacturing Firms: Mediating Effects of Innovative and Operational Performance", Journal of Korea technology innovation society, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 146-173, 2014.
  3. D. H. Kim, J. R. Chio, "A Study on the Strategic Selection of Competitive Priorities and Business Performance through Product Innovation in the Korean Manufacturing Industry," Journal of Korea technology innovation society, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 139-156, 2011.
  4. H. J. Kim, H. G. Chang, "A Study on the Effects of Total Quality Management Core Factor on Business Performance," Korea Society of Digital Industry and Information Management, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 71-77, 2005.
  5. C. U. Kim., "Process Innovation and Selection of Organizational Structure : Modeling and Simulation of Innovation Competition Process," Korean system dynamics review, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 73-97, 2004.
  6. S. M. Park, J. H. Seo, "A Relationship between Intensity of Technology Management, Technological Capabilities and Barriers to Innovations in SMEs," The Journal of Small Business Innovation, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 81-99, 2012.
  7. J. O. Park, T. K. Park, "Effects of Production Innovation and Managerial Innovation on Business Performance in SMEs in the Daegu-Gyeongbuk Region," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 27-47, 2012.
  8. Y. T. Park, "Technology and Management for Engineers," Life and Power Press, 2005.
  9. B. J. Min, K. H. Park, "A Study on the Effect of Team Empowerment of Hotel Organization on the Non-Financial Job Performance," International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, Vol. 14, p. 115, 2004.
  10. Y. S. Shin, K. S. Ha, "A Study on the Effects of the Technology Management Capability on the Success of Technology Commercialization," Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 10, No. 9, pp. 97-110, 2012.
  11. S. H. Oh, S. Y. Han, S. J. Bae, "How does product innovation enhance firmperformance? : the moderating role of process innovation, organizational innovation and marketing innovation," Journal of Korea technology innovation society, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 1006-1031, 2013.
  12. S. K. Jang, Y. S. Shin and H. H. Jung, "Relationship Between R&D Investment, Technology Management Capability and FirmPerformance," Korean Management Review, Vol, 38, No. 1, pp, 105-132, 2009.
  13. C. K, Wang, B. L. Ang, "Determinants of Venture Performance in Singapore," Journal of Small Business Management, Vol, 42, No. 4, pp, 347-363, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2004.00116.x
  14. D. H. Han, "A Study of Q.M System Requirement Factors & Non financial Performance Focus on the manufacture company and non-manufacture company on ISO certification," The e-business studies, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 287-304, 2013.
  15. N. W. Hwang, J. M. Lee, Y. B. Kim, "Effect of Technological Collaboration on Firm's Product Innovation Output: The Moderating Roles of Appropriability, Journal of technology innovation, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 59-87, 2014. https://doi.org/10.14383/SIME.2014.22.1.003
  16. Adler, P. S, Shenbar, A., "Adapting Your Technological Base: The Organizational Challenge," Sloan Management Review, Vol, 25, pp, 25-37, 1990.
  17. Benedetto, C, D, "Identifying The Key Success Factors in New Product Launch," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp, 36-49, 1999.
  18. Camison, C. Villar-Lopez, A. "Organizational Innovation as an Enabler of Technological Innovation Capabilities and Firm Performance," Journal of Business Research, Vol, 67, No. 1, pp, 2891-2902, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.06.004
  19. Freel, Mark S, "Do Small Innovating Firms Outperform Non-innovators?," Small Business Economics, Vol, 14, No. 3, pp, 195-210, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008100206266
  20. Langerak, F. "The Effect of Market Orientation on Positional Advantage and Organizational Performance." Journal of Strategic Marketing, Vol, 11, No. 2, pp, 93-115, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254032000102957
  21. Schumpeter, J, "The Theory of Economic Development," Harvard University Press, Cambrige, NA.
  22. Van Wyk, R, "Technology Analysis: A Foundation for Technological Expertise." Handbook of Technology Management, pp, 5-9, 1996.