Journal of Service Research and Studies (서비스연구)

The Society of service Science (서비스사이언스학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Success Factors for Technology Commercialization in IT Industry

IT업계의 기술상용화 주요 요인에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2017.04.27
  • Accepted : 2017.06.08
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purposes of this paper is to identify CSFs for technology commercialization in IT industry, and to empirically investigate the impact of CSFs on the success of technology commercialization. Comprehensive literature study identifies eleven factors affecting the process and results of technology transfer and the research results show that 'Incentives for Commercialization,' 'Leadership Support,' 'Government Support,' 'Cooperation among Parties,' and 'Understanding of Business' are the most influential factors. Regression analyses show that CSFs in total have very significant explanatory power in the success of technology commercialization. 'Incentives for Commercialization,' 'Cooperation among Parties, 'Demand-Pull Technology', and 'Commercialization Experience' are statistically significant in explaining the success of commercialization. Successful commercialization projects show higher explanatory power (46.80%) than failure projects (38.50%).

본 논문은 IT업계에서 기술 상용화에 영향을 미치는 주요 요인을 파악하고, 기술 상용화 주요요인이 상용화의 성공에 미치는 영향력을 검증하는데 있다. IT 기술 상용화 프로젝트 관리자들은 기술의 상용화에 가장 영향을 미치는 요인으로 '기술 상용화 장려책'을 꼽았고, 뒤이어 '경영층 지원,' '정부 지원,' '관계자간의 협력,' '경영에 대한 이해' 순으로 평가하였다. 회귀분석 결과 기술 상용화에 영향을 미치는 11개 주요 요인은 종합적으로 기술 상용화의 성공에 대한 설명력이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 특히 '기술 상용화 장려책,' '관련자간의 협력,' '수요자 요청 기술'은 유의수준 1%에서 '기술 상용화 경험'은 유의수준 10%에서 통계적으로 유의하여 기술 상용화의 성공에 가장 많은 기여를 하는 것으로 판명되었다. 성공한 상용화 프로젝트의 경우 주요 요인의 기술 상용화의 성공에 대한 설명력(46.80%)이 실패한 프로젝트의 설명력(38.50%)에 비해 높은 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrecht, T. L., & Ropp, V. A. (1984). Communicating about innovation in networks of three US organizations. Journal of Communication, 34(3), 78-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1984.tb02175.x
  2. Avery, C. M. (1989). Organizational communication in technology transfer between an R&D consortium and its shareholders: the case of MCC (Doctoral diss ertation, University of Texas at Austin).
  3. Badawy, M. K. (1988). What we've learned: Managin g human resources. Research-Technology Management, 31(5), 19-35.
  4. Baer, E. et al. (1976). Analysis of Federally Funded Demonstration Projects, Executive summary, R-192 6, Rand Corp.
  5. Bopp, G. R. (1988). Federal lab technology transfer. Praeger.
  6. Brown, F. G. (1983). Principles of educational and psychological testing. Wadsworth Pub Co.
  7. Chae, S. (2005). Social science research methodology, 3rd, B&M books (채서일. (2005). 사회과학조사방법론, 3판, 비앤엠북스).
  8. Conceicao, P., Gibson, D., Heitor, M. V. & Shariq, S. (1997). Towards a research agenda for knowledge policies and management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(2), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004588
  9. Cooper, R. (1986). Winning at New Products, Addison-Wesley Pub.
  10. Creighton, J. W., Jolly, J. A., & Buckles, T. A. (1985). The manager's role in technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 10(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172841
  11. Devine, M. D., James, T. E., & Adams, T. I. (1987). Government supported industry-university research centers: Issues for successful technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 12(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02371360
  12. Elmes, M., & Wilemon, D. (1991). A field study of intergroup integration in technology-based organiz ations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 7(3-4), 229-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-4748(91)90035-P
  13. Ettlie, J. E. (1982). The commercialization of federally sponsored technological innovations. Research Policy, 11(3), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(82)90018-X
  14. Evan, W. M., & Olk, P. (1990). R&D consortia: A new US organizational form. MIT Sloan Management Review, 31(3), 37.
  15. Fusfeld, H. I., & Haklisch, C. S. (1985). COOPERATIVE R-AND-D FOR COMPETITORS. Harvard Business Review, 63(6), 60.
  16. Gibson, D. V., & Niwa, K. (1991). Knowledge-based technology transfer. In Technology Management: the New International Language (pp. 503-506). IEEE.
  17. Gibson, D. V., Kozmetsky, G., & Smilor, R. W. (1992). The technopolis phenomenon: Smartcities, fast systems, global networks. Rowman & Littlefield.
  18. Gibson, D., & Rogers, E. (1988). The MCC comes to Texas. Measuring the information society, 91-115.
  19. Gibson, D. V., & Rogers, E. M. (1994). R & D collaboration on trial: the Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation. Harvard Business Press.
  20. Gibson, D. V., & Smilor, R. W. (1991). Key variables in technology transfer: A field-study based empirical analysis. Journal of Engineering and Technology management, 8(3-4), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-4748(91)90015-J
  21. Brown, M. A., Berry, L. G., & Goel, R. K. (1991). Guidelines for successfully transferring governme nt-sponsored innovations. Research Policy, 20(2), 121-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(91)90075-2
  22. Inman, B. R. (1984). "The Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation," in R. Kuhn (Eds.), Commercializing Defense-Related Technology, New York: Praeger, 149-152.
  23. Jolly, V. K. (1997). Commercializing new technologies: getting from mind to market. Harvard Business Press.
  24. Kidder, T. (1983). The Soul of a New Machine, MA: Little Brown and Company.
  25. Leonard-Barton, D. (1988). "Implementation as Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Organization," Research Policy, 17(5), 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(88)90006-6
  26. Lester, D. (1988). "Critical Success Factors for New Product Development", Research Technology Management, January - February, 36-44.
  27. Levinson, N. S., & Moran, D. D. (1987). R&D management and organizational coupling. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, (1), 28-35.
  28. Little, A. D. (1976). 1nc Federal Funding of Civilian Research and Development.
  29. McEachron, N. (1978). Management of Federal R& D for Commercialization, Executive Summary and Final Report, SRI International.
  30. McMullan, W., & Melnyk, K. (1988). University innovation centres and academic venture formation. R &D Management, 18(1), 5-12.
  31. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning. (2015). http://www.msip.go.kr.
  32. Murphy III, W. J. (1987). Cooperative action to achieve competitive strategic objectives: A study of the microelectronics and computer technology corporation.
  33. Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). Psychometric theory.
  34. Peters, T. J., Waterman, R. H., & Jones, I. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America's best-run companies.
  35. Pinkston, J. T. (1989). Technology transfer: issues for consortia. Entrepreneurial Management: New Technology and New Market Development, Boston, MA: Ballinger, 143-149.
  36. Rothwell, R. (1992). Successful industrial innovation: critical factors for the 1990s. R&d Management, 22(3), 221-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1992.tb00812.x
  37. Sedaitis, J. B. (1997). Commercializing high technology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  38. Smilor, R., Gibson, D. and Kozmetsky, G.(1988a). Creating the Technopolis: Linking Technology Commercialization and Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
  39. Smilor, R., Gibson, D., and Kozmetsky, G. (1988b). "Creating the Technopolis: High-Technology Development in Austin, Texas," Journal of Business Venturing, 4, 49-67.
  40. Smith, D. and Alexander, R.(1988). Fumbling the Future: How Xerox Invented ,the Ignored, the First Personal Computer, New York: William Morrow.
  41. Sung, T. and Gibson, D. (2005). "Knowledge and Technology Transfer Grid: Empirical Assessment," International Journal of Technology Management, 29, Nos. 3-4, 216-230. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2005.005997
  42. Sung, T. (2009). "Technology Transfer in the IT Industry: A Korean Perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(9), 700-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.03.011
  43. Sung, T. (2009). "A Study on Technology Transfer in IT Industry," Management Information Systems review, 28(3), 46-68 (성태경. (2009). IT산업계의 기술이전에 관한 연구, 경영정보연구, 28(3), 46-68).
  44. Weick, K. (1990). "Technology as Equivoque: Sens e-Making in New Technologies," In P. Goodman and L. Sproull (Eds.), Technology and Organizations, Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA, 1-44.
  45. World Bank. (1997). Report.
  46. Zaltman, G., Dundan, R., and Holbeck, J. (1973). Innovation and Organizations, New York: Wiley.

Cited by

  1. A Critical Look at Discourses on Machine Translation vol.19, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15749/jts.2018.19.1.005
  2. 제4차 산업혁명의 기술 상용화에 관한 연구 vol.9, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.18807/jsrs.2019.9.1.073