References
- Nahabedian MY. Managing the opposite breast: contralateral symmetry procedures. Cancer J 2008;14:258-63. https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0b013e31817fbe2b
- Nahabedian MY. Symmetrical breast reconstruction: analysis of secondary procedures after reconstruction with implants and autologous tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115: 257-60.
- Losken A, Carlson GW, Bostwick J 3rd, et al. Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;110:89-97. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200207000-00016
- Smith ML, Clarke-Pearson EM, Vornovitsky M, et al. The efficacy of simultaneous breast reconstruction and contralateral balancing procedures in reducing the need for second stage operations. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41:535-41. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.535
- Giacalone PL, Bricout N, Dantas MJ, et al. Achieving symmetry in unilateral breast reconstruction: 17 years experience with 683 patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2002;26:299-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-002-2034-6
- Nahabedian MY, Galdino G. Symmetrical breast reconstruction: is there a role for three-dimensional digital photography? Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;112:1582-90. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000085818.54980.C4
- Tepper OM, Small K, Rudolph L, et al. Virtual 3-dimensional modeling as a valuable adjunct to aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Am J Surg 2006;192:548-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.026
- Losken A, Fishman I, Denson DD, et al. An objective evaluation of breast symmetry and shape differences using 3-dimensional images. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:571-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000185459.49434.5f
- Lee WY, Kim MJ, Lew DH, et al. Three-dimensional surface imaging is an effective tool for measuring breast volume: a validation study. Arch Plast Surg 2016;43:430-7. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2016.43.5.430
- Singletary SE, Kroll SS. Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Adv Surg 1996;30:39-52.
- Kroll SS, Khoo A, Singletary SE, et al. Local recurrence risk after skin-sparing and conventional mastectomy: a 6-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:421-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199908000-00015
- Eccles DM, Gareth Evans D. Management of the contralateral breast in patients with hereditary breast cancer. Breast 2000;9:301-5. https://doi.org/10.1054/brst.2000.0143
- Raabe NK, Sauer T, Erichsen A, et al. Breast cancer in the contralateral breast: incidence and histopathology after unilateral radical treatment of the first breast cancer. Oncol Rep 1999;6:1001-7.
- Healey EA, Cook EF, Orav EJ, et al. Contralateral breast cancer: clinical characteristics and impact on prognosis. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:1545-52. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1993.11.8.1545
- Claus EB, Stowe M, Carter D, et al. The risk of a contralateral breast cancer among women diagnosed with ductal and lobular breast carcinoma in situ: data from the Connecticut Tumor Registry. Breast 2003;12:451-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9776(03)00152-8
- Rosen PP, Groshen S, Kinne DW, et al. Contralateral breast carcinoma: an assessment of risk and prognosis in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) patients with 20-year follow-up. Surgery 1989;106:904-10.
- Mendelson EB. Evaluation of the postoperative breast. Radiol Clin North Am 1992;30:107-38.
- Silverstein MJ, Handel N, Gamagami P, et al. Mammographic measurements before and after augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990;86:1126-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199012000-00014
- Handel N, Silverstein MJ, Gamagami P, et al. Factors affecting mammographic visualization of the breast after augmentation mammaplasty. JAMA 1992;268:1913-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490140121047
Cited by
- Current status of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in South Korea vol.64, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2021.64.1.5