참고문헌
- 고영만, 조수련, 박지영 (2013). 학술지의 피인용횟수 순위를 적용한 tapered h-지수의 변형지표 "Kor-hT"에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 30(4), 111-131. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.111(Ko, Young Man, Cho, Soo-Ryun, & Park, Ji Young (2013). A study on the "Kor-hT", a modified tapered h-index, by applying the ranking according to the number of citations of journals in evaluating Korean journals. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 111-131. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.111)
- 안혜림, 박지홍 (2016). 저자 인용 네트워크에서 명망성 지표의 차별된 영향력 측정기준에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 33(2), 61-76. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.2.061(Ahn, Hyerim, & Park, Ji-Hong (2016). The distinct impact dimensions of the prestige indices in author citation networks. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 33(2), 61-76. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.2.061)
- 유소영, 이재윤, 정은경, 이보람 (2015). 연구성과평가 지침 리뷰 및 국내 적용 제안을 위한 고찰. 정보관리학회지, 32(4), 249-272. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.249(Yu, So-Young, Lee, Jae Yun, Chung, EunKyung, & Lee, Boram (2015). A review of declarations on appropriate research evaluation for exploring their applications to research evaluation system of Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(4), 249-272. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.249)
- 이재윤 (2006). 연구성과 측정을 위한 h-지수의 개량에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 23(3), 167-186. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.3.167(Lee, Jae Yun (2006). Some improvements on h-index: Measuring research outputs by citation. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 23(3), 167-186. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2006.23.3.167)
- 이재윤 (2014). 공동연구 네트워크 분석을 위한 중심성 지수에 대한 비교 연구. 정보관리학회지, 31(3), 153-179. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.153(Lee, Jae Yun (2014). A comparative study on the centrality measures for analyzing research collaboration networks. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(3), 153-179. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.153)
- 이재윤 (2015). 문헌동시인용 분석을 통한 한국 문헌정보학의 연구 전선 파악. 정보관리학회지, 32(4), 77-106. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.077(Lee, Jae Yun (2015). Identifying the research fronts in Korean library and information science by document co-citation analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(4), 77-106. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.077)
- 이재윤 (2016). 공저자 수를 고려한 h-지수 산출. 정보관리학회지, 33(3), 7-29. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.3.007(Lee, Jae Yun (2016). Calculating the h-index and its variants considering the number of authors in a paper. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 33(3), 7-29. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.3.007)
- 이재윤, 최상희 (2015). 논문 인용 영향력 측정 지수의 편향성에 대한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 32(4), 205-221. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.205(Lee, Jae Yun, & Choi, Sanghee (2015). Discipline bias of document citation impact indicators: Analyzing articles in Korean Citation Index. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(4), 205-221. http://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.205)
- Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2011). The h index as a research performance indicator. European Science Editing, 37, 77-80. Retrieved from http://www.lutz-bornmann.de/icons/viewpoints.pdf
- Burrell, Q. L. (2007). On the h-index, the size of the Hirsch core and Jin's A-index. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 170-177. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.01.003
- Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2008). Is g-index better than h-index? An exploratory study at the individual level. Scientometrics, 77(2), 267-288. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1997-0
- Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69, 131-152. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7
- Gingras, Y. (2016). Bibliometrics and research evaluation: Use and abuse. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
- Huh, Sun (2014). Journal metrics-based position of diabetes & metabolism journal after the change of its text language to English. Diabetes and Metabolism Journal, 38(3), 187-193. http://doi.org/10.4093/dmj.2014.38.3.187
- Lee, Jongwook, & Yang, Kiduk (2015). Co-authorship credit allocation methods in the assessment of citation impact of chemistry faculty. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(3), 273-289. http://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2015.49.3.273
- Roemer, R. C., & Borchardt, R. (2015). Meaningful metrics: A 21st-century librarian's guide to bibliometrics, altmetrics, and research impact. Chicago, IL: Association of College & Research Libraries.
- Rousseau, R. (2006). New developments related to the Hirsch index. Science Focus, 1(4), 23-25. Retrieved from http://eprints.rclis.org/7616/1/Hirsch_new_developments.pdf
- Schreiber, M. (2010). Revisiting the g-index: The average number of citations in the g-core. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 169-174. http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21218
- Todeschini, R., & Baccini, A. (2016). Handbook of bibliometric indicators: Quantitative tools for studying and evaluating research. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.