Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure

Korean Society of Ecology and Infrastructure Engineering (응용생태공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Stable Channel Design for Physical Disturbance Reduction and Analysis of Habitat Suitability

물리적 교란 저감을 위한 안정하도의 설계와 서식적합도 분석

  • 이웅희 (상지대학교 건설시스템 공학과) ;
  • 문형근 ((주)정엔지니어링) ;
  • 최흥식 (상지대학교 건설시스템 공학과)
  • Received : 2017.09.15
  • Accepted : 2017.09.19
  • Published : 2017.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzed the aspect of bed change according to the stable channel design on the Wonju River to quantitatively evaluate habitat suitability (HS). According to the result of evaluating stable channel of object section in the Wonju River, 17 sections among total 20 sections were stable and 3 sections were unstable. Physical disturbance improvement evaluation (PDIE) was the range average showed good disturbance condition with a range average of 112.17 points. Habitat suitability index of Zacco Koreanus, the most dominant species of the Wonju River, was used for analysis of physical habitat for fish. According to the physical habitat analysis result, HS was 0.16 and weighted usable area (WUA) was $347.68m^2$. The methods of improving/introducing/removing structures and dredging stream channel were used for stable channel design of unstable channel, and analyzed PDIE according to the aspect of bed change and changes in habitat suitability. Stable channel design was possible in 19 sections in times of structures improvement/introduction/removal, and PDIE was 117.53 points, HS was 0.14 points, and WUA was $313.37m^2$. Stable channel design was possible in all 20 sections when dredging the stream channel. PDIE was 116.50 points, HS was 0.16, and WUA was $332.14m^2$. Therefore, this study obtained channel design measures that can improve physical soundness and stability of the Wonju River, and it was analyzed that it will have no impact on changes of physical disturbance and physical habitat. Furthermore, this study analyzed velocity and depth of each section and appearance frequency of riffle and pool to analyze correlation between physical disturbance and physical habitat. According to the analysis result, it was identified that the analysis of riffle and pool showed similar result as the evaluation result of physical habitat.

본 연구는 원주천을 대상으로 안정하도 설계에 따른 하상변동 양상을 분석하여 물리적 교란과 서식적합도 (Habitat suitability, HS)를 정량적으로 평가하였다. 현재의 원주천 대상구간에 대한 안정하도 평가 결과 총 20개 구간 중 17개 구간이 안정하였으며, 3개 구간이 불안정한 것으로 나타났다. 물리적 교란개선 평가 (Physical disturbance improvement evaluation, PDIE) 결과 구간평균 112.17점으로 현재 양호한 교란개선 상태를 나타냈다. 어류의 물리서식처 분석은 원주천의 최우점종인 참갈겨니의 서식적합지수를 이용하였다. 물리서식처 분석 결과 HS는 0.16, 가중가용면적 (Weighted usable area, WUA)은 $347.68m^2$으로 나타났다. 불안정 하도의 안정하도 설계를 위해서 시설물의 개선 도입 철거와 하도를 준설하는 방법을 이용하였으며, 하상변동 양상에 따른 PDIE와 서식적합도의 변화를 분석하였다. 시설물의 개선 도입 철거 시 19개 구간에서 안정하도 설계가 가능하였으며, PDIE는 117.53점, HS는 0.14, WUA는 $313.37m^2$로 나타났다. 하도의 준설 시 20개 전구간에서 안정하도 설계가 가능하였다. PDIE는 116.50점으로 나타났으며, HS는 0.16, WUA는 $332.14m^2$으로 나타났다. 따라서 원주천의 물리적 건전성과 안정성을 제고할 수 있는 하도설계 방안을 도출하였으며, 그에 따른 물리적 교란과 물리서식처의 변화는 영향이 없을 것으로 분석되었다. 아울러 물리적 교란과 물리서식처의 상관 분석을 위해 구간별 유속과 수심 및 여울과 소의 출현 빈도를 분석하였다. 분석 결과 여울과 소의 분석은 물리서식처의 평가 결과와 유사하게 나타남을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ackers, P. and White, W.R. 1973. Sediment transport: new approach and analysis. Journal of Hydraulics Division, ASCE 99: 2041-2060.
  2. Bovee, K.D., Lam, B.L., Bartholow, J.M., Stalnaker, C.B., Taklor, J. and Henriksen, J. 1998. Stream Habitat Analysis Using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. Biological Resources Division Information and Technology Report, USGS, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
  3. Brownlie, W.R. 1981. Prediction of flow depth and sediment transport in open channels. Report No. KH-R-43A, Institute of Technology, California, USA.
  4. Choi, G.W., Kim, H.J., Park, J.S. and Han, M.S. 2010. Hydromorphological structure assessment of urban streams after close-to-nature stream restoration using LAWA. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association 43: 421-431. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2010.43.5.421
  5. Choi, H.S. and Lee, W.H. 2014. Analyses of riverbed changes and physical disturbance evaluations by weir installation in a reach. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers 34: 1203-1213. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2014.34.4.1203
  6. Choi, H.S. and Lee, W.H. 2015. A correlation analysis between physical disturbance and fish habitat suitability before and after channel structure rehabilitation. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 2: 33-41. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2015.2.1.033
  7. Choi, H.S., Shim, K.R. and Lee, W.H. 2015. An improvement and applicability of physical disturbance evaluation technique by quantification in river system. Journal of Wetlands Research 17: 209-220. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2015.17.3.209
  8. Choi, J.G., Lee, S.H., Lee, H.G. and Shin, H.S. 2012. The characteristics of fish fauna and distribution by habitat type in the Yanghwa stream of the Namhan River basins. Journal of Environment and Ecology 26: 884-891.
  9. Copeland, R.R. 1994. Application of Channel Stability Methods - Case Studies. Technical Report No. HL-94-11, United States Army Corps of Engineers. Mississippi, USA.
  10. CRAES. 2012. Technical Regulation for Assessment of River Health. Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China.
  11. Engelund, F. and Hansen, E.E. 1967. A monograph of sediment transport in alluvial rivers. Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen.
  12. Environment Australia. 2000. Australian River Assessment System: Review of Physical River Assessment Methods-A Biological Perspective. Monitoring River Health Initiative Technical Report, Report Number 21. Canberra, Australia.
  13. Hesselink, A.W., Kleinhans, M.G. and Boreel, G.L. 2006. Historical discharge measurements in three Rhine branches. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 132: 140-145. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2006)132:2(140)
  14. Ji, U. and Jang, E.K. 2015. Stable channel design for the gravel-bed river considering design constraints. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society 16: 2860-2867. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.4.2860
  15. Jo, Y.H. 1997. Development of an Evaluation Method of Stream Naturalness for Ecological Restoration of Stream Corridors. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Seoul, Korea. (in Korean)
  16. Jia, Y.T. and Chen, Y.F. 2013. River health assessment in a large river: Bioindicators of fish population. Ecological Indicators 26: 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.10.011
  17. LAWA. 2000. Gewasserstrukturgutekartierung in der BRD. 1. Auf. Schwerin. Landerarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser, Stuttgart, Germany.
  18. Lee, W.H. and Choi, H.S. 2016. Physical disturbance improvement evaluation and habitat suitability analysis by stable channel design. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 3: 285-293. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2016.3.4.285
  19. ME. 2010. The Development of Ecological Risk/Health Assessment in Aquatic Systems using Multiple Fish Bioindicators and Fish Stressor Identification Methodology. Ministry of Environment, Sejong, Korea. (in Korean)
  20. Meyer-Peter, E. and Müeller, R. 1948. Formulas for bed-load Transport. Proceeding of 2nd Meeting of the International Association for Hydraulic, International Association of Hydraulic Research Delft, Sweden, 39-64.
  21. Ministerium für Umwelt. 2005. Gewasserstrukturgute in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Dusseldorf, Germany.
  22. MOCT. 1999. Basic plan for river maintenance of Wonju Stream. Ministry of Construction & Transportation, Gwacheon, Korea. (in Korean)
  23. Scott, D.T., Jhon, F.O., Molly, M.P. and Carrie, L.M. 2005. Flood disturbance and riparian species diversity on the Colorado river delta. Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 1175-1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-7841-4
  24. Soar, P.J. and Thorne, C.R. 2001. Channel Restoration Design for Meandering Rivers. ERDC/CHL CR-01-1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Washington DC, USA.
  25. Stein, J.L., Stein, J.A. and Nix, H.A. 2002. Spatial analysis of anthropogenic river disturbance at regional and continental scales: Identifying the Wild Rivers of Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning 60: 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00048-8
  26. USDA. 1998. Stream Visual Assessment Protocol. National Water and Climate Center Technical Note 99-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, USA.
  27. Yang, C.T. 1973. Incipient motion and sediment transport. Journal of Hydraulics Division 99: 1679-1704.
  28. Yang, C.T. 2003. Sediment Transport: Theory and Practice. Krieger publishing company, U.S.