DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CT Quantification of Lungs and Airways in Normal Korean Subjects

  • Kim, Song Soo (Department of Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jin, Gong Yong (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Chonbuk National University Medical School, Institute of Medical Science) ;
  • Li, Yuan Zhe (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Jeong Eun (Department of Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Hye Soo (Department of Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.08.15
  • Accepted : 2017.01.05
  • Published : 2017.08.01

Abstract

Objective: To measure and compare the quantitative parameters of the lungs and airways in Korean never-smokers and current or former smokers ("ever-smokers"). Materials and Methods: Never-smokers (n = 119) and ever-smokers (n = 45) who had normal spirometry and visually normal chest computed tomography (CT) results were retrospectively enrolled in this study. For quantitative CT analyses, the low attenuation area (LAA) of $LAA_{I-950}$, $LAA_{E-856}$, CT attenuation value at the 15th percentile, mean lung attenuation (MLA), bronchial wall thickness of inner perimeter of a 10 mm diameter airway (Pi10), total lung capacity ($TLC_{CT}$), and functional residual capacity ($FRC_{CT}$) were calculated based on inspiratory and expiratory CT images. To compare the results between groups according to age, sex, and smoking history, independent t test, one way ANOVA, correlation test, and simple and multiple regression analyses were performed. Results: The values of attenuation parameters and volume on inspiratory and expiratory quantitative computed tomography (QCT) were significantly different between males and females (p < 0.001). The MLA and the 15th percentile value on inspiratory QCT were significantly lower in the ever-smoker group than in the never-smoker group (p < 0.05). On expiratory QCT, all lung attenuation parameters were significantly different according to the age range (p < 0.05). Pi10 in ever-smokers was significantly correlated with forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (r = -0.455, p = 0.003). In simple and multivariate regression analyses, $TLC_{CT}$, $FRC_{CT}$, and age showed significant associations with lung attenuation (p < 0.05), and only $TLC_{CT}$ was significantly associated with inspiratory Pi10. Conclusion: In Korean subjects with normal spirometry and visually normal chest CT, there may be significant differences in QCT parameters according to sex, age, and smoking history.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Dongkook Pharm. Co., Ltd.

References

  1. Stockley RA, Mannino D, Barnes PJ. Burden and pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2009;6:524-526 https://doi.org/10.1513/pats.200904-016DS
  2. Roy K, Smith J, Kolsum U, Borrill Z, Vestbo J, Singh D. COPD phenotype description using principal components analysis. Respir Res 2009;10:41 https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-10-41
  3. Bergin C, Muller N, Nichols DM, Lillington G, Hogg JC, Mullen B, et al. The diagnosis of emphysema. A computed tomographic-pathologic correlation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986;133:541-546
  4. Hackx M, Bankier AA, Gevenois PA. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: CT quantification of airways disease. Radiology 2012;265:34-48 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12111270
  5. Lynch DA, Al-Qaisi MA. Quantitative computed tomography in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Thorac Imaging 2013;28:284-290 https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0b013e318298733c
  6. Lee YK, Oh YM, Lee JH, Kim EK, Lee JH, Kim N, et al. Quantitative assessment of emphysema, air trapping, and airway thickening on computed tomography. Lung 2008;186:157-165 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-008-9071-0
  7. Burrows B. An overview of obstructive lung diseases. Med Clin North Am 1981;65:455-471 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-7125(16)31509-7
  8. Fletcher C, Peto R. The natural history of chronic airflow obstruction. Br Med J 1977;1:1645-1648 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.6077.1645
  9. Niewoehner DE, Kleinerman J, Rice DB. Pathologic changes in the peripheral airways of young cigarette smokers. N Engl J Med 1974;291:755-758 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197410102911503
  10. Zach JA, Newell JD Jr, Schroeder J, Murphy JR, Curran-Everett D, Hoffman EA, et al. Quantitative computed tomography of the lungs and airways in healthy nonsmoking adults. Invest Radiol 2012;47:596-602 https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e318262292e
  11. Regan EA, Lynch DA, Curran-Everett D, Curtis JL, Austin JH, Grenier PA, et al. Clinical and radiologic disease in smokers with normal spirometry. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175:1539-1549 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2735
  12. Gevenois PA, Scillia P, de Maertelaer V, Michils A, De Vuyst P, Yernault JC. The effects of age, sex, lung size, and hyperinflation on CT lung densitometry. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:1169-1173 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.167.5.8911175
  13. Irion KL, Marchiori E, Hochhegger B, Porto Nda S, Moreira Jda S, Anselmi CE, et al. CT quantification of emphysema in young subjects with no recognizable chest disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:W90-W96 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3502
  14. Regan EA, Hokanson JE, Murphy JR, Make B, Lynch DA, Beaty TH, et al. Genetic epidemiology of COPD (COPDGene) study design. COPD 2010;7:32-43
  15. Grydeland TB, Thorsen E, Dirksen A, Jensen R, Coxson HO, Pillai SG, et al. Quantitative CT measures of emphysema and airway wall thickness are related to D(L)CO. Respir Med 2011;105:343-351 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2010.10.018
  16. Gevenois PA, de Maertelaer V, De Vuyst P, Zanen J, Yernault JC. Comparison of computed density and macroscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:653-657 https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.152.2.7633722
  17. Tschirren J, Hoffman EA, McLennan G, Sonka M. Segmentation and quantitative analysis of intrathoracic airway trees from computed tomography images. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2005;2:484-487 https://doi.org/10.1513/pats.200507-078DS
  18. Palagyi K, Tschirren J, Hoffman EA, Sonka M. Quantitative analysis of pulmonary airway tree structures. Comput Biol Med 2006;36:974-996 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2005.05.004
  19. Zhang L, Hoffman EA, Reinhardt JM. Atlas-driven lung lobe segmentation in volumetric X-ray CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006;25:1-16 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2005.859209
  20. Hoffman EA, Simon BA, McLennan G. State of the art. A structural and functional assessment of the lung via multidetector-row computed tomography: phenotyping chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2006;3:519-532 https://doi.org/10.1513/pats.200603-086MS
  21. Standardization of spirometry, 1994 update. American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:1107-1136 https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.152.3.7663792
  22. Marsh S, Aldington S, Williams MV, Nowitz MR, Kingzett-Taylor A, Weatherall M, et al. Utility of lung density measurements in the diagnosis of emphysema. Respir Med 2007;101:1512-1520 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2007.01.002
  23. Soejima K, Yamaguchi K, Kohda E, Takeshita K, Ito Y, Mastubara H, et al. Longitudinal follow-up study of smokinginduced lung density changes by high-resolution computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161(4 Pt 1):1264-1273 https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.161.4.9905040

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Filtered Back Projection, Hybrid Iterative Reconstruction, Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction, and Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstruction Images at Both Low- and Standard-Dose Settings i vol.19, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.809
  2. Age of Data in Contemporary Research Articles Published in Representative General Radiology Journals vol.19, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1172
  3. Impact of Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction on the Correlation between Computed Tomography Quantification of a Low Lung Attenuation Area and Airway Measurements and Pulmonary Function Test Results vol.19, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.19.6.1187
  4. A Glimpse on Trends and Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in the Korean Journal of Radiology vol.20, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0928
  5. Prediction of Treatment Response in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease by Determination of Airway Dimensions with Baseline Computed Tomography vol.20, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0204
  6. Structural and Functional Features on Quantitative Chest Computed Tomography in the Korean Asian versus the White American Healthy Non-Smokers vol.20, pp.7, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0083
  7. The importance of CT quantitative evaluation of emphysema in lung cancer screening cohort with negative findings by visual evaluation vol.13, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.13084
  8. Characteristics of Recent Articles Published in the Korean Journal of Radiology Based on the Citation Frequency vol.21, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.1322
  9. Relative Regional Air Volume Change Maps at the Acinar Scale Reflect Variable Ventilation in Low Lung Attenuation of COPD patients vol.27, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.12.004
  10. Quantitative CT-based image registration metrics provide different ventilation and lung motion patterns in prone and supine positions in healthy subjects vol.21, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01519-5
  11. A 3D-CNN model with CT-based parametric response mapping for classifying COPD subjects vol.11, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79336-5
  12. Quantitative computed tomography imaging-based classification of cement dust-exposed subjects with an artificial neural network technique vol.141, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105162