Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Stress distribution of implants with external and internal connection design: a 3-D finite element analysis

내측 연결 및 외측 연결 방식으로 설계된 임플란트의 3차원적 유한요소 응력 분석

  • Chung, Hyunju (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yang, Sung-Pyo (Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, KAIST) ;
  • Park, Jae-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Chan (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Shin, Jin-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yang, Hongso (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 정현주 (전남대학교 치과대학 치주과) ;
  • 양성표 (카이스트 생체 및 뇌공학과) ;
  • 박재호 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철과) ;
  • 박찬 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철과) ;
  • 신진호 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철과) ;
  • 양홍서 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철과)
  • Received : 2017.08.08
  • Accepted : 2017.09.01
  • Published : 2017.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the stress distribution of mandibular molar restoration supported by the implants with external hex and internal taper abutment connection design. Materials and Methods: Models of external connection (EXHEX) and internal connection (INCON) implants, corresponding abutment/crowns, and screws were developed. Supporting edentulous mandibular bony structures were designed. All the components were assembled and a finite element analysis was performed to predict the magnitude and pattern of stresses generated by occlusal loading. A total of 120 N static force was applied both by axial (L1) and oblique (L2) direction. Results: Peak von Mises stresses produced in the implants by L2 load produced 6 - 15 times greater than those by L1 load. The INCON model showed 2.2 times greater total amount of crown cusp deflection than the EXHEX model. Fastening screw in EXHEX model and upside margin of implant fixture in INCON model generated the peak von Mises stresses by oblique occlusal force. EXHEX model and INCON model showed the similar opening gap between abutment and fixture, but intimate sealing inside the contact interface was maintained in INCON model. Conclusion: Oblique force produced grater magnitudes of deflection and stress than those by axial force. The maximum stress area at the implant was different between the INCON and EXHEX models.

목적: 외측 육각형과 내측 원추형 연결부로 설계된 임플란트 지지 하악 구치 수복물에 교합력을 가할때 발생하는 생역학 현상을 분석하고자 한다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 외측 연결형 임플란트(EXHEX)와 내측 연결형 임플란트(INCON) 그리고 이와 결합할 해당 나사와 지대주 및 크라운을 제작하였고, 하악 무치악 치조골을 설계하였다. 각 부분을 조립하여 2종의 유한요소 모형을 제작하였다. 총 120 N 크기의 수직력(L1)과 45도 측방력(L2)을 가하였고, 유한요소 응력 분석을 시행하였다. 결과: L2 측방력 하중에 의해 발생한 최대 응력은 L1 수직력 하중에 의한 것 보다 6 - 15배 더 컸다. INCON 모델은 EXHEX 모델보다 크라운 교두부에서 2.2배 더 큰 변위량을 보여 주었다. 측방력에 의해 EXHEX 모델은 나사에서, INCON 모델은 임플란트 고정체의 상단 변연부에서 폰미세스 응력의 최대값이 관찰 되었다. INCON 모델에서는 임플란트 내부 계면에서 긴밀한 접촉이 유지 되었다. 결론: 측방력이 큰 변형과 응력을 발생하였으나, 임플란트에서의 최대 응력 발생부위는 INCON과 EXHEX 모델이 서로 상이하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Eckert SE, Meraw SJ, Cal E, Ow RK. Analysis of incidence and associated factors with fractured implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:662-7.
  2. Sanchez-Perez A, Moya-Villaescusa MJ, Jornet-Garcia A, Gomez S. Etiology, risk factors and management of implant fractures. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:e504-8.
  3. Eckert SE, Choi YG, Sanchez AR, Koka S. Complication of dental implant systems: quality of clinical evidence and prediction of 5-year survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:406-15.
  4. Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of a 1-piece and 2- piece conical abutment joint in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000:11:458-64. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011005458.x
  5. Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:76-95.
  6. Khraisat A, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, Miyakawa O. Fatigue resistance of two implant/abutment joint designs. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:604-10. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.129384
  7. Cehreli MC, Akca K, Iplikcio lu H, Sahin S. Dynamic fatigue resistance of implant-abutment junction in an internally notched morse-taper oral implant: influence of abutment design. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:459-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01023.x
  8. Dittmer S, Dittmer MP, Kohorst P, Jendras M, Borchers L, Stiesch M. Effect of implant-abutment connection design on load bearing capacity and failure mode of implants. J Prosthodont 2011;20:510-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00758.x
  9. Boggan RS, Strong JT, Misch CE, Bidez MW. Influence of hex geometry and prosthetic table width on static and fatigue strength of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:436-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70030-2
  10. Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Ludwig K, Kern M. Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1276-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01581.x
  11. Conrad HJ, Schulte JK, Vallee MC. Fractures related to occlusal overload with single posterior implants: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:251-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)00041-3
  12. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:121-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00212-9
  13. McDermott NE, Chuang SK, Woo VV, Dodson TB. Complications of dental implants: identification, frequency, and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:848-55.
  14. Mollersten L, Lockowandt P, Linden L. Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: an in vitro test. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:582-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70009-X
  15. Djebbar N, Serier B, Bouiadjra BB, Benbarek S, Drai A. Analysis of the effect of load direction on the stress distribution in dental implant. Mater Des 2010;31:2097-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.042
  16. Sevimay M, Turhan F, Kilicarslan MA, Eskitascioglu G. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in an implant-supported crown. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:227-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.12.019
  17. Iplikcio lu H, Akca K. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implant supporting three-unit fixed partial prosthesis on stress distribution in the bone. J Dent 2002;30:41-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00057-4
  18. Jorn D, Kohorst P, Besdo S, Rucker M, Stiesch M, Borchers L. Influence of lubricant on screw preload and stresses in a finite model for a dental implant. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:340-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.016
  19. Eskitascioglu G, Usumez A, Sevimay M, Soykan E, Unsal E. The influence of occlusal loading location on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite element study. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:144-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.10.018
  20. Freitas-Junior AC, Rochac EP, Bonfante EA, Almeida EO, Anchieta RB, Martini AP, Assuncao WG, Silva NR, Coelho PG. Biomechanical evaluation of internal and external hexagon platform switched implant-abutment connections: an in vitro laboratory and three-dimensional finite element analysis. Dent Mater 2012;28:e218-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.05.004
  21. Choi AH, Matinlinna JP, Ben-Nissan B. Finite element stress analysis of Ti-6Al-4V and partially stabilized zirconia dental implant during clenching. Acta Odontol Scand 2012;70:353-61. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2011.600723
  22. Ma L, Guess PC, Zhang Y. Load-bearing properties of minimal-invasive monolithic lithium disilicate and zirconia occlusal onlays: finite element and theoretical analyses. Dent Mater 2013;29:742-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.004
  23. Pessoa RS, Muraru L, Marcantonio Junior E, Vaz LG, Sloten JV, Duyck J, Jaecques SV. Influence of implant connection type on the biomechanical environment of immediately placed implants - CTbased nonlinear, three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:219-34.
  24. Tang CB, Liu SY, Zhou GX, Yu JH, Zhang GD, Bao YD, Wang QJ. Nonlinear finite element analysis of three implant-abutment interface designs. Int J Oral Sci 2012;4:101-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2012.35
  25. Yamanishi Y, Yamaguchi S, Imazato S, Nakano T, Yatani H. Influences of implant neck design and implant-abutment joint type on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Dent Mater 2012;28:1126-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.160
  26. Tsouknidas A, Lympoudi E, Michalakis K, Giannopoulos D, Michailidis N, Pissiotis A, Fytanidas D, Kugiumtzis D. Influence of alveolar bone loss and different alloys on the biomechanical behavior of internal- and external-connection implants: a threedimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015:30:e30-42. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3814
  27. Ausiello P, Franciosa P, Martorelli M, Watts DC. Numerical fatigue 3D-FE modeling of indirect composite-restored posterior teeth. Dent Mater 2011;27:423-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.12.001
  28. Farah JW, Craig RG, Meroueh KA. Finite element analysis of three and four unit bridges. J Oral Rehabil 1989;16:603-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1989.tb01384.x
  29. Schindler HJ, Stengel E, Spiess WE. Feedback control during mastication of solid food textures-a clinical-experimental study. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:330-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70134-9
  30. Richter EJ. In vivo vertical forces on implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:99-108.
  31. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:241-7.
  32. Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Bossmann K, Kern M. In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of different implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:875-81.
  33. Nascimento C, Barbosa RE, Issa JP, Watanabe E, Ito IY, Albuquerque RF Jr. Bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of premachined or cast components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:177-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.07.026
  34. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran DL. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone change around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2001;72:1372-83. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1372