DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The multi-axial testing system for earthquake engineering researches

  • Lin, Te-Hung (National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, National Applied Research Laboratories) ;
  • Chen, Pei-Ching (Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Lin, Ker-Chun (National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, National Applied Research Laboratories)
  • Received : 2017.05.02
  • Accepted : 2017.07.03
  • Published : 2017.08.25

Abstract

Multi-Axial Testing System (MATS) is a 6-DOF loading system located at National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE) in Taiwan for advanced seismic testing of structural components or sub-assemblages. MATS was designed and constructed for a large variety of structural testing, especially for the specimens that require to be subjected to vertical and longitudinal loading simultaneously, such as reinforced concrete columns and lead rubber bearings. Functionally, MATS consists of a high strength self-reacting frame, a rigid platen, and a large number of servo-hydraulic actuators. The high strength self-reacting frame is composed of two post-tensioned A-shape reinforced concrete frames interconnected by a steel-and-concrete composite cross beam and a reinforced concrete reacting base. The specimen can be anchored between the top cross beam and the bottom rigid platen within a 5-meter high and 3.25-meter wide clear space. In addition to the longitudinal horizontal actuators that can be installed for various configurations, a total number of 13 servo-hydraulic actuators are connected to the rigid platen. Degree-of-freedom control of the rigid platen can be achieved by driving these actuators commanded by a digital controller. The specification and information of MATS in detail are described in this paper, providing the users with a technical point of view on the design, application, and limitation of MATS. Finally, future potential application employing advanced experimental technology is also presented in this paper.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmadizadeh, M. and Mosqueda, G. (2008), "Hybrid simulation with improved operator-splitting integration using experimental tangent stiffness matrix estimation", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 134(12), 1829-1838. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:12(1829)
  2. Bhayusukma, M.Y. and Tsai, K.C. (2014), "High-strength RC columns subjected to high-axial and increasing cyclic lateral loads", Earthq. Struct., 7(5), 779-796. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.7.5.779
  3. Chang, S.Y. (2002), "Explicit pseudodynamic algorithm with unconditional stability", J. Eng. Mech., 128(9), 935-947. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:9(935)
  4. Chang, S.Y. (2007), "Enhanced, unconditionally stable, explicit pseudodynamic algorithm", J. Eng. Mech., 133(5), 541-554. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:5(541)
  5. Chen, C. and Ricles, J.M. (2008), "Development of direct integration algorithms for structural dynamics using discrete control theory", J. Eng. Mech., 134(8), 676-683. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2008)134:8(676)
  6. Chen, P.C., Tsai, K.C., Chen, J.C. and Lin, T.H. (2009), "Advanced seismic experiments using SCRAMNet: an example on the cyclic test of a coupled-SPSW substructure", Proceedings of the 22th KKCNN Symposium on Civil Engineering, Chiangmai, Thailand, November.
  7. Elanwar, H.H. and Elnashai, A.S. (2014), "On-line model updating in hybrid simulation tests", J. Earthq. Eng., 18(3), 350-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2013.873375
  8. Hashemi, M.J., Masroor, A. and Mosqueda, G. (2014), "Implementation of online model updating in hybrid simulation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 43(3), 395-412. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2350
  9. Hung, C.C. and El-Tawil, S. (2009), "Full operator algorithm for hybrid simulation", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 38(13), 1545-1561. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.921
  10. Kim, D., Oh, J., Do, J. and Park, J. (2014), "Effects of thermal aging on mechanical properties of laminated lead and natural rubber bearing", Earthq. Struct., 6(2),127-140. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.2.127
  11. Li, C.H., Tsai, K.C., Chang, J.T., Lin, C.H., Chen, J.C., Lin, T.H. and Chen, P.C. (2012), "Cyclic test of a coupled steel plate shear wall substructure", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 41(9), 1277-1299. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1180
  12. Mahin, S.A. and Shing, P.B. (1985), "Pseudodynamic method for seismic testing", J. Struct. Eng., 111(7), 1482-1503. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:7(1482)
  13. Mosqueda, G. and Ahmadizadeh, M. (2011), "Iterative implicit integration procedure for hybrid simulation of large nonlinear structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 40(9), 945-960. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1066
  14. Rich, R.T. (1998), "Platen design for the seismic response modification device testing facility", Report No. SSRP 98/07, University of California, San Diego.
  15. Shing, P.B., Nakashima, M. and Bursi, O.S. (1996), "Application of pseudodynamic test method to structural research", Earthq. Spectra, 12(1), 112-141.
  16. Tsai, C.Y., Tsai, K.C., Ao, W.H., Roeder, C.W., Mahin, S.A., Lin, C.H., Yu, Y.J., Wang, K.J., Wu, A.C., Chen, J.C. and Lin, T.H. (2012), "Seismic design and hybrid tests of a full-scale 3-story concentrically braced frame using in-plane buckling braces", Earthq. Spectra, 29(3),1043-1067. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000165
  17. Verma, M., Rajasankar, J. and Iyer, N.R. (2015), "Numerical assessment of step-by-step integration methods in the paradigm of real-time hybrid testing", Earthq. Struct., 8(6), 1325-1348. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.6.1325
  18. Wang, P., Shi, Q.X., Wang, Q.W. and Tao, Y. (2015), "Experimental behavior and shear bearing capacity calculation of RC columns with a vertical splitting failure", Earthq. Struct., 9(6), 1233-1250. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.9.6.1233
  19. Yang, Y.S., Tsai, K.C., Elnashai, A.S. and Hsieh, T.J. (2012), "An online optimization method for bridge dynamic hybrid simulations", Simulat. Model. Practice Theory, 28, 42-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2012.06.002