Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Change of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers' Professional Visions through Video-Based Reflection on Science Classroom

과학 수업 비디오에 기초한 반성 활동을 통한 초등 예비교사의 전문적 시각의 변화

  • Received : 2017.04.29
  • Accepted : 2017.06.15
  • Published : 2017.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated the change of pre-service elementary teachers' professional visions through video-based reflection on science teaching with focus on their attention and pedagogical reasoning about student learning. Specifically, we compared two reflection cycles before and after pre-service elementary teachers went through the collaborative video-based reflection process in a professional learning community. The primary data were collected from eight pre-service elementary teachers and included their science lesson plans, videotaped lessons, video-reflection papers, and transcripts from the interviews. Pre-service elementary teachers' attention was categorized in five aspects: classroom management & control, teacher's instruction, students' thinking & learning, subject knowledge, and assessment. The level of their pedagogical reasoning about student thinking and learning was determined with six levels based on the number of evidence, evidence area, and evidence type. The findings revealed that 1) individual reflection is not enough - collaborative reflection is essential to change their attention toward students learning and thinking 2) pedagogical reasoning levels increase gradually throughout the individual and collaborative video-based reflection processes. The participants not only attributed student learning solely to the characteristics of students but also connected it with their own instruction or science content knowledge and used different types of evidences as they went through two reflection cycles. Implications for using video in the teacher education program were discussed.

이 연구에서는 초등 예비교사 8명을 대상으로 과학 수업 비디오에 기초한 개인적, 협동적 반성 활동이 예비교사의 전문적 시각을 어떻게 변화시키는지 그 과정을 탐색하였다. 본 연구의 데이터로는 예비교사와의 개별 면담 녹음 자료, 예비교사의 과학 수업 지도안, 과학수업 비디오, 연구자가 수업 참관 시 작성한 현장 노트, 연구 일지, 예비교사가 작성한 이벤트 맵 등이 활용되었다. 예비교사의 전문적 시각은 '선택적 주목'과 '교육적 추론'의 두 가지 범주로 분석하였다. 선택적 주목은 1) 수업 운영과 통제, 2) 교사의 지도, 3) 학생의 사고와 학습 4) 내용 지식 5) 평가의 다섯 측면으로 구분하였고 교육적 추론수준은 증거의 수, 증거의 영역, 유형에 따라 6 수준으로 구분하였다. 연구 결과 수업 비디오에 기초한 개인적 반성은 '수업 운영과 통제'에 대한 주목을 줄이고 '교사의 지도'에 대해 좀 더 주목하도록 하는 효과가 있었다. '학생의 사고나 학습'에 대한 주목을 증진시키기 위해서는 수업 비디오에 대한 개인적 반성 활동만으로는 그 효과가 충분하지 않고 협동적 반성 활동이 필요한 것으로 나타났다. 교육적 추론수준은 개인적 반성과 협동적 반성을 거치며 점진적으로 증가하였다. 학생의 사고나 학습에 대한 주장에서 하나의 증거보다는 여러 증거를 사용하게 되었고 증거의 영역과 유형도 좀 더 다양해졌다. 그러나 증거 형태는 직접적인 관찰에 의한 것이 대부분이었고, 교육이론에 기초한 증거는 거의 나타나지 않았다. 교사교육 과정에서 수업 비디오의 활용에 대한 시사점을 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Buxton, C. A., Salinas, A., Mahotiere, M., Lee, O., & Secada, W. G. (2013). Leveraging cultural resources through teacher pedagogical reasoning: Elementary grade teachers analyze second language learners' science problem solving. Teaching and Teacher Education, 32, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.01.003
  2. Davis, E. A. (2006). Characterizing productive reflection among pre-service elementary teachers: Seeing what matters, Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(3), 281-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.11.005
  3. Fuller, F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207-226. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312006002207
  4. Goldman, R. (2007). Video representations and the perspectivity framework: epistemology, ethnography, evaluation, and ethics. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 3-38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  5. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606-633. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100
  6. Hammer, D., & Van Zee, E. H. (2006). Seeing the science in children's thinking: Case studies of student inquiry in physical science. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  7. Herman, W. E. (1998). Promoting pedagogical reasoning as preservice teachers analyze case vignettes. Journal of teacher education, 49(5), 391-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487198049005009
  8. Kisa, M. T., & Stein, M. K. (2015). Learning to see teaching in new ways: A foundation for maintaining cognitive demand. American Educational Research Journal, 52(1), 105-136. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214549452
  9. LaBoskey, V. K. (1994). Development of reflective practice: A study of preservice teachers. New York: Teachers College Press.
  10. Lachner, A., Jarodzka, H., & Nuckles, M. (2016). What makes an expert teacher? Investigating teachers' professional vision and discourse abilities. Instructional Science, 44(3), 197-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9376-y
  11. Lemke, J. (2007). Video epistemology in- and outside the box: traversing attentional spaces. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 39-51). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  12. Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers' attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108330245
  13. Maskiewicz, A. C., & Winters, V. A. (2012). Understanding the co-construction of inquiry practices: A case study of a responsive teaching environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), 429-464. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21007
  14. Park, S., & Oliver, J. S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in science Education, 38(3), 261-284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9049-6
  15. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  16. Penso, S., & Shoham, E. (2003). Student teachers' reasoning while making pedagogical decisions. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26(3), 313-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261976032000128166
  17. Russ, R. S., & Luna, M. J. (2013). Inferring teacher epistemological framing from local patterns in teacher noticing. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 284-314. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21063
  18. Sabers, D. S., Cushing, K. S., & Berliner, D. C. (1991). Differences among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity, multidimensional, and immediacy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 63-88. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312028001063
  19. Seidel, T., & Sturmer, K. (2014). Modeling and measuring the structure of professional vision in preservice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 51(4), 739-771. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214531321
  20. Seidel, T., Sturmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and teacher education, 27(2), 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.009
  21. Sherin, M. G. (2004). New perspectives on the role of video in teacher education. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Using video in teacher education (pp. 1-28). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
  22. Sherin, M. G. (2007). The development of teachers' professional vision in video clubs. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Video research in the learning sciences (pp. 383-395). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  23. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers' ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of technology and teacher education, 13(3), 475.
  24. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328155
  25. Sherin, M. G., Russ, R. S., Sherin, B. L., & Colestock, A. (2008). Professional vision in action: An exploratory study. Issues in Teacher Education, 17(2), 27-46.
  26. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1174482
  27. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  28. Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to observe: Using video to improve preservice mathematics teachers' ability to notice. Journal of mathematics teacher education, 11(2), 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7
  29. Steffensky, M., Gold, B., Holdynski, M., & Moller, K. (2015). Professional vision of classroom management and learning support in science classrooms? Does professional vision differ across general and content-specific classroom interactions? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 351-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9607-0
  30. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). How different video club designs support teachers in "learning to notice". Journal of computing in teacher education, 22(4), 125-135.
  31. Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers' "learning to notice" in the context of a video club. Teaching and teacher education, 24(2), 244-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
  32. Wang, J., & Hartley, K. (2003). Video technology as a support for teacher education reform. Journal of technology and teacher education, 11(1), 105-138.