Accessibility Analysis of Mobile Applications for Open Platforms

개방 플랫폼용 모바일 애플리케이션 접근성 분석

  • 문현주 (충북대학교 소프트웨어학과) ;
  • 민홍기 (인천대학교 정보통신공학과) ;
  • 김석일 (충북대학교 소프트웨어학과)
  • Received : 2017.04.17
  • Accepted : 2017.05.30
  • Published : 2017.05.31

Abstract

In this study, we analyzed the accessibility of open platform Android mobile banking applications, based on Korean mobile application accessibility KS standard, Section 508 technical standard of Rehabilitation Act, and European BBC guidelines. Experimental result showed that there are no mobile banking applications of 8 commercial banks in Korea that satisfy all guidelines of three standards. Typical violations included missing alternative text, keyboard focus violations, control size and spacing non-compliance, and low contrast ratio. These violations are fatal in that they make the accessibility of the blind, the disabled and the low vision and the elderly impossible. The reason that mobile banking applications do not comply with accessibility is that mobile application developers and providers have low awareness of accessibility and do not know how to implement accessibility properly. Comparing Korea mobile application accessibility guidelines with the revised standard of the Section 508 of Rehabilitation Act and the BBC standard, many guidelines are missing. Also, evaluation criteria are ambiguous and abstract, making it difficult for developers to refer specifically. Therefore, improving mobile application accessibility requires developer and government efforts and complementation of standards.

이 연구에서는 우리나라의 모바일 앱 접근성 KS, 미국의 재활법 508조 개정 표준 및 유럽의 BBC 지침을 기준으로 개방형 플랫폼인 안드로이드 모바일 뱅킹 앱의 접근성을 분석하였다. 실험 결과, 우리나라 8개 시중은행의 모바일 뱅킹 앱 중 상기 3가지 표준의 세부 항목을 모두 만족하는 앱은 한 곳도 없었다. 대표적인 위반 항목은 대체 텍스트 미비, 키보드 초점 위반, 컨트롤 크기 및 간격 미준수, 명도대비 비율 낮음 등이었다. 이들 위반사례는 시각장애인, 상지장애인 및 저시력인과 고령자의 접근을 불가능하게 만든다는 점에서 치명적인 오류이다. 모바일 뱅킹 앱이 접근성을 준수하지 않는 원인에 있어서는 모바일 앱 개발자와 제공자들의 접근성에 관한 인식이 낮고 접근성 구현 방법을 제대로 숙지하지 못한 것으로 분석되었다. 우리나라의 모바일 앱 접근성 지침을 재활법 508조 개정 표준 및 BBC 표준과 비교한 결과, 많은 항목이 누락되어 있었다. 또한 평가 기준이 모호하고 추상적이어서 개발자들이 구체적으로 참고하기 어려운 측면이 있는 것으로 판단되었다. 따라서 모바일 앱 접근성 향상을 위한 개발자 및 정부의 노력과 더불어 표준의 보완이 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. "Information gap index and survey," 2Periodic statistical quality diagnosis report for 2015, Statistical Office, 2015.
  2. "Future Creation Science Division, 2015 Information Accessibility Survey released," Press Releases, Future Creation Science Division 2015. 2. 17.
  3. H. J, Moon, , S. I. Kim, "A Study on Amendment of the Mobile Application Accessibility Guideline based on User Evaluation," Journal of Rehabilitation Research, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 181-205, 2014.
  4. "Mobile Accessibility Guidelines," http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/, BBC, 2013.
  5. Section 508 technical standards, https://www.accessboard.gov/guidelines-and-standards/communicationsand-it/, US Access Board, 2017.
  6. "Mobile banking outstrips Internet banking." ZDNetKorea, 2016. 6. 14.
  7. Web Content Accessibility Guideline(WCAG) 2.0, W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/, W3C, 2008.
  8. Mobile Accessibility : How WCAG 2.0 and Other W3C/WAI Guidelines Apply to Mobile. https://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-accessibility-mapping/, W3C, 2015.
  9. KS X 3253 Mobile application content accessibility guidelines 2.0, KS, 2016.
  10. Jose-Manuel Diaz-Bossini and Lourdes Moreno, "Accessibility to Mobile Interfaces for Older People," 5th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Info-exclusion(DSAI 2014), vol. 66, pp. 57-66, 2014.
  11. Leandro Coelho Serra, Lucas Pedroso Carvalho, Lucas Pereira Ferreira, Jorge Belimar Silva Vaz and Andre Pimenta Freire, "Accessibility Evaluation of E-Government Mobile Applications in Brazil," 6th International Conference on Software Development and Technologies for Enhancing Accessibility and Fighting Infoexclusion(DSAI 2015), vol. 67, pp. 348-357, 2015.
  12. J. H. Hyun, S. I. Kim, "Evaluation of the Accessibility of Library Mobile Applications," Journal of Assistive Technology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18-36, 2011.
  13. M. H. Hong, H. J. Part, "Evaluate mobile SNS app accessibility in terms of people with disabilities and the elderly," Journal of Digital Contents Society, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 575-582, 2012. https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2012.13.4.575
  14. B. S. Jang, Y. J. Nam, "Evaluation of the Accessibility of Library Mobile Applications," Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 25-44, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2014.48.2.025
  15. J. I. Lee, H. W. Nam, S. M. Lee, "A Study on the Usability Evaluation of Smart Banking Application," Journal of Korea Society of Design Culture, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 346-360, 2012.
  16. J. I. Lee, H. W. Nam, H. K. Jeong, Y. W. Kim, "A study on the mobile banking usability evaluation of new silver generation," Korea Science and Technology Forum, vol. 12, pp. 209-220, 2013. https://doi.org/10.17548/ksaf.2013.04.12.209
  17. E. Y. Han, "Accessibility analysis of smartphone banking application in Korea: Focused on accessibility for visually impaired people," Master Thesis, Hongik University, 2012.
  18. H. Son, "Examples of improving mobile accessibility using automated checking tools", 2016 HCI KOREA.
  19. "Bank Electronic Finance in the first half of 2015," Digital Times, 2015. 9. 18.
  20. S, I, Kim, M. S. Jang, "Design of Software Application Accessibility Assessment Tool," Assistive Technology Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 17-34, 2010.
  21. S. I. Kim, "Web accessibility automatic monitoring system design," Computer Information and Communications Research Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 7-16, 2013.