Journal of rehabilitation welfare engineering & assistive technology (재활복지공학회논문지)

Rehabilitation Engineering And Assistive Technology Society of Korea (한국재활복지공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Reliability and Validity of Useful Field of View Test

UFOV(Useful Field of View test) 검사의 신뢰도 및 타당도 검증

  • 곽호성 (우송대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 정봉근 (순천향대학교 작업치료학과)
  • Received : 2017.02.22
  • Accepted : 2017.05.25
  • Published : 2017.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The aim of the study is to examine the reliability and validity of UFOV, which is a visual driving evaluation tool that has been proven to be reliable and valid in western countries, for the purpose of adapting the tool in a systematic manner to the South Korean population. Two evaluator assessed 23 healthy and 19 stroke patients with UFOV, Trail Making Test A & B(TMT A & B) and Motor Free Visual Perception Test(MVPT) from 7 October 2014 to 25 November, 2014. The researcher analyzed inter-rater reliability, correlation between raters of UFOV with Intraclass correlation coefficient, test-retest reliablility, UFOV with spearman correlation coefficient, concurrent validity, UFOV, TMT A & B and MVPT with spearman correlation coefficient, and discriminative validity, comparison mean scores of UFOV between groups, healthy and stroke with Mann-Whitney U test. UFOV score of participants with stroke had lower compared to the healthy control group. The inter-rater reliability(p<.001), test-retest reliability(p<.01) and concurrent validity(p<.01) was statistically significant. Also discriminant validity was statistically significant(p<.001). Based on this study, Use of UFOV for drivers at risk is essential to prevent future traffic accidents and support driving rehabilitation.

본 연구의 목적은 국내에 거주하고 있는 뇌졸중 환자 및 일반인을 대상으로 국외에서 표준화된 운전 적합성 평가도구인 UFOV(Useful Field of View Test) 검사 도구의 신뢰도와 타당도를 분석하는 것이다. 2014년 10월부터 11월까지 서울시 소재 병원에 입원중인 뇌졸중 환자 19명과 일반인 23명을 대상으로 인구사회학적 정보와 UFOV 검사-재검사 신뢰도, 검사자간 신뢰도, UFOV와 TMT A&B, MVPT 점수를 비교한 동시타당도, 뇌졸중 환자와 일반인의 UFOV 검사결과로 판별타당도를 분석하였다. 그 결과 UFOV 검사의 검사-재검사 신뢰도는 하위항목 1~3에서 모두 .83(p<.01)이상을 보였으며, 검사자간 신뢰도(ICC=2,1)는 하위 항목 1~3에서 모두 .92(p<.001)이상을 보였다. 동시타당도를 알아보기 위한 TMT A&B, MVPT와 UFOV 검사의 세 하위항목과의 상관에서 모두 통계학적으로 유의한 관계를 보였으며, 판별타당도는 모든 항목에서 뇌졸중 환자와 일반인의 경우 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 나타냈다(p<.001). 따라서 UFOV 검사는 작업치료 임상 분야에서 뇌졸중 환자의 운전사고 예방 및 운전능력을 평가하기 위한 도구로 사용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. P. S. Hu, & J. R. Young, Summary of trends:1995, Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey, 1995.
  2. R. Fuller, Towards a general theory of driver behaviour, Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 461-472, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2004.11.003
  3. M. H. Lim, S. W. Park, & E. S. Choi, Assessment for Driving of People With Brain Injury -Application of Cognitive Perceptual Assessment for Driving(CPAD)-, The Jouranl of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 41-50, 2011.
  4. A. B. Thomas, H. James, Banos, L. A. Amy, J. S. Jeffey, W. Warren, B. Jacqueline, S. David, UFOV performance and driving ability following traumatic brain injury, Brain Injury, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 455-461, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050600664541
  5. D. Y. Lee, K. M. Rhee, D. Y. Lee, S. C. Lee, S. W. Lee, M. J. Lim, & J. M. Kim, A study on the conceptual design of cars accessible for persons with disabilities, The Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 139-159, 2004.
  6. Serio. C. Devany, & M. Devens, Employment problems following traumatic brain injury: Families assess the cause, Neurorehabilitation, vol. 4, pp. 53-57, 1994.
  7. G. D. Fisk, C. Owsley, & M. Mennemeier, Vision, attention, and self-reported driving behaviors in community-dwelling stroke survivors, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 469-477, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.31179
  8. Ministry of Government Legislation, Enforcement Rule of the Road Traffic Act, 2014.
  9. J. H. Yoo, S. J. Jang, S. W. Park, D. A. Kim, J. W. Lee, W. K. Jeong, J. H. Lee & S. I. Kim, A preliminary study on the standardization of the cognitive perceptual assessment for driving, Korean stroke society, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 68-72, 2004
  10. L. Staplin, K. H. Lococo, K. W. Gish, & L. E. Decina, Model Driver Screening and Evaluation Program Final Technical Report, Volume 2: Maryland Pilot Older Driver Study (Report no. DOT HS 809 583), Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2003
  11. K. K. Ball, B. L. Beard, D. L. Roenker, R. L. Miller, & D. S. Griggs, Age and visual search: Expanding the useful field of view, Journal of the Optical Society of America, vol. 5, pp. 2210-2219, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.5.002210
  12. G. Stacey, & C. Maria, Establishing Criterion Validity of the Useful Field of View Assessment and Stroke Drivers' Screening Assessment: Comparison to the Result of On-Road Assessment, The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 114-122, 2010. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.64.1.114
  13. L. M. Mazer, S. Sofer, N. A. Korner-Bitensky, & I. Gelinas, Use of the UFOV to Evaluate nd Retrain Visual Attention Skills in Clients With Stroke: A Pilot Study, The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 552-557, 2001. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.55.5.552
  14. S. M. Renee, K, B. Karlene, D. K. Thomas, L. R. David, & T. G. Kathryn, Relation of useful field of view and other screening tests to on-road driving performance, Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol. 91, pp. 279-290, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.2000.91.1.279
  15. C. Owsley, K. Ball, G. Mcgwin, M. E. Sloane, D. L. Roenker, M. F. White, & E. T. Overley, Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults, Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 279, pp. 1083-1088, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.14.1083
  16. M. D. Lezak, Neuropsychological assessment, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
  17. E. H. Seo, D. Y. Lee, K. W. Kim, J. H. Lee, J. H. Jhoo, J. C. Youn, I. H. Choo, J. Ha, J. I. Woo, A normative study of the trail making test in korean elders, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 21, pp. 844-852, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.1570
  18. M. J. Bouska, & E. Kwatny, Manual for application of the motor free visual perception test to the adult population. Philadelphia, PA: Academic Therapy Publication, 1983.
  19. B. L. Mazer, N. A. Korner-Bitensky, & S. Sofer, Predicting ability to drive after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, vol. 79, pp. 743-750, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90350-1
  20. J. D. Edwards, D. E. Vance, V. G. Wadley, G. M. Cissell, D. L. Roenker, & K. K. Ball, Reliability and Validity of Useful Field of View Test Scores as Administered by Personal Computer, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, vol. 27, pp. 529-543. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390490515432
  21. B. L. Hills, Vision, visibility, and perception in driving, Perception, vol. 9, pp. 183-216, 1980. https://doi.org/10.1068/p090183