Comparison of Noise and Doses of Low Dose and High Resolution Chest CT for Automatic Tube Current Modulation and Fixed Tube Current Technique using Glass Dosimetry

유리선량계를 이용한 관전류자동조절기법과 고정관전류기법에서 저선량 및 고해상 흉부CT의 노이즈 및 선량 비교

  • Park, Tae Seok (Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Shinhan University) ;
  • Han, Jun Hee (Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Shinhan University) ;
  • Jo, Seung Yeon (Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Shinhan University) ;
  • Lee, Eun Lim (Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Shinhan University) ;
  • Jo, Kyu Won (Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Shinhan University) ;
  • Kweon, Dae Cheol (Department of Radiological Science, College of Health Science, Shinhan University)
  • 박태석 (신한대학교 보건과학대학 방사선학과) ;
  • 한준희 (신한대학교 보건과학대학 방사선학과) ;
  • 조승연 (신한대학교 보건과학대학 방사선학과) ;
  • 이은임 (신한대학교 보건과학대학 방사선학과) ;
  • 조규원 (신한대학교 보건과학대학 방사선학과) ;
  • 권대철 (신한대학교 보건과학대학 방사선학과)
  • Received : 2017.06.14
  • Accepted : 2017.09.02
  • Published : 2017.09.30

Abstract

To compare the radiation dose and image noise of low dose computed tomography (CT) and high resolution CT using the fixed tube current technique and automatic tube current modulation (CARE Dose 4D). Chest CT and human anthropomorphic phantom were used the RPL (radiophotoluminescence) dosimeters. For image evaluation, standard deviation of mean CT attenuation coefficient and CT attenuation coefficient was measured using ROI analysis function. The effective dose was calculated using CTDIvol and DLP. CARE Dose 4D was reduced by 74.7% and HRCT by 64.4% compared to the fixed tube current technique in low dose CT of chest phantom. In CTDIvol and DLP, the dose of CARE Dose 4D was reduced by fixed tube current technique. For effective dose, CARE Dose 4D was reduced by 47% and HRCT by 46.9% compared to the fixed tube current method, and the dose of CARE Dose 4D was significantly different (p<.05). Noise in the image was higher than that in the fixed tube current technique. Noise difference in the image of CARE Dose 4D in low dose CT was significant (p<.05). The low radiation dose and the noise difference of the CARE Dose 4D were compared with the fixed tube current technique in low dose CT and HRCT using chest phantom. The radiation doses using CARE Dose 4D were in accordance with the national and international dose standards. CARE Dose 4D should be applied to low dose CT and HRCT for clinical examination.

Keywords