The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration (대한감각통합치료학회지)

Korean Academy of Sensory Integration (대한감각통합치료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Systematic Review of Praxis Function With Children: Based on Sensory Integration

아동의 실행기능 평가도구에 대한 체계적 고찰: 감각통합기반중심으로

  • Shin, Ye-Na (Brain Sensory Integration Developmental Institute) ;
  • Park, Ji-Hyuck (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Yonsei University) ;
  • Ahn, Si-Nae (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, Yeoju Institute of Technology)
  • 신예나 (브레인 감각통합 발달연구소) ;
  • 박지혁 (연세대학교 작업치료학과) ;
  • 안시내 (여주대학교 작업치료과)
  • Received : 2017.05.16
  • Accepted : 2017.09.01
  • Published : 2017.09.11
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : This study is to analyze the current trends of research and the subject and method of assessments used in praxis functions through a systematic review. Methods : Through the PubMed, Proquest, and Google database, research articles from January of 1985 through April of 2016 were searched. The keywords used for this search were "praxis AND (validity OR reliability) AND (assessment OR test) AND (preschooler OR child)". Additionally, the name for the assessments from the previous review studies of praxis function assessments was searched. In the end, 14 papers were chosen and 8 assessments that were used in these papers were analyzed. Results : Among the final 14 papers, 10 studies (71.4%) were level III (non-randomized one group) which was the largest number in this review, followed by 4 studies (28.6%) with level II (non-randomized two groups). There was no RCT study which is the level of evidence of the level I research. The results for the analysis of the subjects' age of the final 8 assessments that were chosen showed that most of the praxis function assessments were developed for children. There were 6 assessments of which their reliability and validity were verified and other 2 assessments of which their reliability and validity were not both verified. Conclusion : This study proposes the current trends of research of praxis function assessments. The study's significance is that it provides a research evidence when choosing and utilizing assessments for the children.

목적 : 본 연구의 목적은 국외의 실행기능 평가도구에 대한 체계적 고찰을 통해 연구의 현황과 실행기능에 사용되는 도구의 대상 및 방법을 분석하고자 하는 것이다. 연구방법 : PubMed, Proquest, Google 전자 데이터베이스를 통해 1985년 1월부터 2016년 4월까지 논문을 검색하였다. 검색용어는 "praxis AND (validity OR reliability) AND (assessment OR test) AND (preschooler OR child)"를 사용하였다. 그 외 실행기능 평가도구의 선행 고찰연구에서 선정된 평가도구의 명을 추가적으로 검색하였다. 최종 선정된 논문은 14편으로 이에 사용된 평가도구 8개에 대하여 분석하였다. 결과 : 최종 선정된 논문 14편의 질적수준은 III단계(단일집단 비무작위연구) 연구가 10개(71.4%)로 가장 많았으며, 그 다음으로 II단계(두집단 비무작위연구) 연구가 4개(28.6%)이었다. I단계의 근거수준인 무작위 비교연구는 없었다. 최종 선정된 8개 평가도구의 대상 연령을 분석한 결과 대부분의 실행기능 평가도구는 아동을 대상으로 개발된 것으로 나타났다. 신뢰도와 타당도 검증이 된 평가도구는 6개이었고, 2개의 평가도구는 타당도는 검증되지 않았다. 결론 : 본 연구는 실행기능 평가도구의 연구 현황을 제시하고, 평가도구의 선택과 활용에 있어 임상적인 근거기반을 제시하였다는 것에 의의가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Arbesman, M., Scheer, J., & Lieberman, D. (2008). Using ATOA's critically appraised topic (CAT) and critically appraised pater (CAP) series to link evidence to practice. OT Practice, 13(5), 18-22.
  2. Asher, A. V., Parham, L. D., & Knox, S. (2008). Interrater reliability of Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests (SIPT) score interpretation. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(3), 308. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.62.3.308
  3. Ayres, A. J. (1979). Sensory integration and the child. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
  4. Ayres, A. J. (1985). Developmental dyspraxia and adult-onset apraxia. Torrance, CA: Sensory Integration International.
  5. Bang, Y. S., Kim, J. M., Kim, M. J., Baek, H. H., Oh, M. H., & Jung, H. A. (2008). Pediatric occupational therapy (2nd ed.). Seoul, Korea: E Public.
  6. Baranek, G. T. (2002). Efficacy of sensory and motor interventions for children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(5), 397-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:10 20541906063
  7. Barkley, R. (1991). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A clinical workbook. New York: Guilford.
  8. Brown, T., & Bourke-Taylor, H. (2014). Children and youth instrument development and testing articles published in the american journal of occupational therapy, 2009-2013: A content, methodology, and instrument design review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy : Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 68(5), e154-e216. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.012237
  9. Bruininks, R. H., & Bruininks, B. D. (2005). Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (2nd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessment.
  10. Bundy, A. C. (2002). Assessing sensory integrative dysfunction. In A. C. Bundy, S. J. Lane., & E. A. Murray (Eds.), Sensory Integration: Theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 211-225). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
  11. Cameron, C. E., Brock, L. L., Murrah, W. M., Bell, L. H., Worzalla, S. L., Grissmer, D., et al. (2012). Fine motor skills and executive function both contribute to kindergarten achievement. Child development, 83(4), 1229-1244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01768.x
  12. Dewey, D., Cantell, M., & Crawford, S. G. (2007). Motor and gestural performance in children with autism spectrum disorders, developmental coordination disorder, and/or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13(2), 246-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1355617707070270
  13. Fingerhut, P., Madill, H., Darrah, J., Hodge, M., & Warren, S. (2002). Classroom-based assessment: Validation for the school AMPS. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(2), 210-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.2.210
  14. Fisher, A. G., Bryze, K., Hume, V., & Griswold, L. A. (2007). School AMPS: School version of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (2nd ed.). Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press.
  15. Henderson, S. E., Sugden, D. A., & Barnett, A. L. (2007) Motor Assessment Battery for children (2nd ed.). London, UK: Pearson.
  16. Hong, E. K., & Kim, K. M. (2013). Systematic review of assessment tools for praxis ability of sensory integrative function: Provide range of assessment tools in foreign and domestic normal children. The Journal Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 11(2), 41-56.
  17. Ivey, C. K., Lane, S. J., & May-Benson, T. A. (2014). Interrater reliability and developmental norms in preschoolers for the Motor Planning Maze Assessment (MPMA). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(5), 539-545. http://dx.doi.org/10. 5014/ajot.2014.012468 https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.012468
  18. Jung, H. R., Choi, Y. W., & Kim, K. M. (2013). A systemic review on sensory integration intervention in Korea: Focusing on Ayres sensory integration. The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 11(2), 27- 40.
  19. Kim, K. M. (2003). The literature review for assessment of sensory integration. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 11(1), 93-98.
  20. Kim, K. M., Kim, Y. G., Kim, T. H., Park, S. H., Yu, E. Y., Lee, J. H., et al. (2007). Frame of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (2 nd.). Seoul: Jungmungack.
  21. Kim, M. H., & Kim, M, S., (2004). The effects of sensory integration therapy camp in children with dyspraxia: Case Study. The Journal Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 2(1), 1-12.
  22. Kirk, S. A., Gallagher, J. J., & Anastasiow, N. J. (2003). Educating exceptional children (10th ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin company.
  23. Kwon, J. S., Kim, Y. G., Kim, J. Y., Yuk, J. S., Jo, H. J., & Hong, S. P. (2008). Cognitive rehabilitation for occupational therapists. Seoul, Korea: Pacific Books.
  24. Lai, J. S., Fisher, A. G., Magalhaes, L. C., & Bundy, A. C. (1996). Construct validity of the sensory integration and praxis tests. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 16(2), 75-97.
  25. Lane, S. J., Ivey, C. K., & May-Benson, T. A. (2014). Test of Ideational Praxis (TIP): Preliminary findings and interrater and test-retest reliability with preschoolers. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(5), 555-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2014.012542
  26. Lee, I. J. (2011). Development in nonverbal intelligence and executive function in 3-7 years old: Comparison between normal and attention problem cchildren. Master's thesis, University of Ulsan, Ulsan.
  27. Muller, U., Zelazo, P. D., & Imrisek, S. (2005). Executive function and children's understanding of false belief: How specific is the relation? Cognitive Development, 20(2), 173-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.12.004
  28. Munkholm, M., Berg, B., Lofgren, B., & Fisher, A. G. (2010). Cross-regional validation of the School version of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64(5), 768-775. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2010.09041
  29. Munkholm, M., Lofgren, B., & Fisher, A. G. (2012). Reliability of the School AMPS measures. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 19(1), 2-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2010.525721
  30. Ozonoff, S. (1998). Assessment and remediation of executive dysfunction in autism and asperger syndrome. In E. Schopler, G. B. Mesibov, & L. J. Kunce (Eds.), Asperger Syndrome or High-Functioning Autism? (pp. 263-292). New york, NY: Plenum press.
  31. Perner, J., & Lang, B. (2000). Theory of mind and executive function: Is there a developmental relationship? Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed., pp. 150-181). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  32. Piek, J. P., Dyck, M. J., Nieman, A., Anderson, M., Hay, D., Smith, L. M., et al. (2014). The relationship between motor coordination, executive functioning and attention in school aged children. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(8), 1063-1076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2003.12.007
  33. Riccio, C. A., Hall, J., Morgan, A., Hynd, G. W., & Gonzalez, J. J. (1994). Executive function and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Relationship with behavioral rating and cognitive ability. Developmental neuropsychology, 10(1), 215-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87565649409540580
  34. Son, M. S., Kim, H. K., Maeng, H. K., Park, M. J., Son, C. R., Jo, S. J., et al. (2013) The Preliminary Study on Praxis in Preschoo- lers in Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 21(4), 37-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.14519/jksot.2013.21.4.04
  35. Stefanie C. B. (2015). Developmental dyspraxia and the play skills of children with Autism. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 69(5), 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2015.017954
  36. Toussaint-Thorin, M., Marchal, F., Benkhaled, O., Pradat-Diehl, P., Boyer, F., & Chevignard, M. (2013). Executive functions of children with developmental dyspraxia: Assessment combining neuropsychological and ecological tests. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 56(4), 268-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab. 2013.02.006
  37. Valentini, N. C., Ramalho, M. H., & Oliveira, M. A. (2014). Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2: Translation, reliability, and validity for Brazilian children. Research in developmental disabilities, 35(3), 733-740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ridd.2013.10.028
  38. Vanvuchelen, M. (2009). Imitation problems in children with autism spectrum disorders. A study of their nature, clinical significance and utility in diagnosis. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
  39. Wilson, B., Pollock, N., Kaplan, B. J., Law, M., & Faris, P. (1992). Reliability and construct validity of the Clinical Observations of Motor and Postural Skills. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(9), 775-783. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.46.9.775
  40. Wilson, B., Pollock, N., Kaplan, B. J., Law, M., & Faris, P. (1992). Reliability and construct validity of the Clinical Observations of Motor and Postural Skills. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 46(9), 775-783. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.46.9.775
  41. Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health and quality of life outcomes, 9(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-8
  42. Wuang, Y. P., & Su, C. Y. (2009). Reliability and responsiveness of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-in children with intellectual disability. Research in developmental disabilities, 30(5), 847-855. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1016/j.ridd.2008.12.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2008.12.002
  43. Wuang, Y. P., Su, C. Y., & Huang, M. H. (2012). Psychometric comparisons of three measures for assessing motor functions in preschoolers with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56(6), 567-578. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01491.x