Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems (한국산업정보학회논문지)

Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems (한국산업정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Collaborative Relations of Supplier-Buyer on Sustainable SCM Activity

공급자-구매자 협력관계가 지속가능 SCM 활동에 미치는 영향

  • 이돈희 (인하대학교 경영학과) ;
  • 이동현 (소프트웨어정책연구소) ;
  • 정경 (국민대학교 음악학부)
  • Received : 2017.07.03
  • Accepted : 2017.07.28
  • Published : 2017.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Purpose of this is to Examine the Effects of Collaborative Relations of Supplier- Buyer, Sustainable Supply Chain Management(SCM) Sctivities, and Collaborative Performance in Automobile-part Companies. The Proposed Research Model is Tested using Structural Equation Modeling for Hypotheses based on the Data Collected from 274 Firms. The Results Indicate that Collaborative Relations of Supplier-buyer Positively Affect Sustainable SCM Activities. In Addition, Sustainable SCM Activities Positively Affects Collaborative Performance. The Results of the Study Show that Collaborative Relations of Supplier-buyer is Positively Associated with Sustainable SCM Activities in both Supplier and Buyer Firms. Sustainable SCM Activities have a Significant Impact on Collaborative Performance in both Parts. In Addition, Collaborative Relations of Supplier-buyer have a Significant Impact on Collaborative Performance of Buyer Firms but Supplier. This Study would Provide Useful Information for Collaboration between Supplier and Buyer to have a Long-term Strategic Relationship on Sustainable SCM Activities, which Impact on Collaborative Performance and Competitive Advantages.

본 연구는 자동차부품업체의 공급자-구매자 협력관계가 지속가능 SCM 활동과 협력성과에 미치는 영향을 분석하고자 한다. 본 연구에서 제안된 연구모형과 가설을 검증하기 위하여 실증자료를 수집하였고 구조모형분석을 이용하여 검증하였다. 분석결과, 첫째, 공급자-구매자간 협력관계가 지속가능 SCM 활동에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었고, 두 집단간 차이분석 결과에서도 공급자와 구매자 관점 모두 협력관계가 지속가능 SCM 활동에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 둘째, 공급자-구매자간 지속가능 SCM 활동이 협력성과에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었고, 두 집단간 차이분석 결과에서도 공급자와 구매자 관점 모두 지속가능 SCM 활동이 협력성과에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 셋째, 공급자-구매자간 협력관계가 협력성과에 정(+)의 영향을 미치나 통계적으로 유의하지 않은 것으로 분석되었으며, 두 집단간 차이분석 결과에서는 공급자 관점은 협력관계가 협력성과에 정(+)의 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 분석되었으나, 구매자 관점은 협력관계가 협력성과에 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되어 관점의 차이에 따라 협력성과 향상에 대한 인지정도는 다른 것으로 평가된다. 본 연구결과는 공급자-구매자 협력관계에 대한 장기적으로 전략적 관계구축을 이루고자 하는 기업들에게 유용한 정보를 제공해 줄 수 있으며, 기업의 협력성과 및 경쟁력 향상을 위한 방안에 활용될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee, D. H., "The Effect of Social Capital and Corporate Social Responsibility Commitment on Sustainable SCM Performance: With the Moderating Influence of Partnerships," The Korean Academic Association of Business Administration, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 65-93, 2016.
  2. Park, S. W., Lee, D. H., and Lee, H. J., "The Impact of Social Capital Development between 1st-and 2nd-tier Suppliers on the 1st-tier Suppliers' Willingness of Shared Growth and Performance," Korean Production and Operations Management Society, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 513-535, 2013.
  3. Gartner, "The Gartner Supply Chain Top 25 for 2016," Retrieved May 19, 2016. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3323617
  4. Kim, H., "Trends and Prospects of Auto Parts Industry," Korea Ratings, pp. 10-11, 2014. http://www.rating.co.kr/component/webzine/674/a1.pdf
  5. Chae, S., Choi, T. Y., and Hur, D., "Buyer Power and Supplier Relationship Commitment: A Cognitive Evaluation Theory Perspective," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 53, pp. 39-60, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12138
  6. Reimann, F., and Ketchen, D., "Power in Supply Chain Management," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 53 No. 2, pp. 3-9, 2017.
  7. Cho, B. Y. and Kang, J. J., "The Effects of Outcome and Behavior Monitoring on Outsourcing Success for Manufacturing Outsourcing," The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 235-257, 2013.
  8. Zu, X., and Kaynak, H., "An Agent Perspective on Supply Chain Quality Management," International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 423-446, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571211223086
  9. Handfield, R. and Nichols, E., "Supply Chain Redesign: Transforming Supply Chains into Integrated Value Systems," Financial Times Prentice Hall, 2008.
  10. Nyaga, G. N., Lynch, D. F., Marshall, D., and Ambrose, E., "Power Asymmetry, Adaptation and Collaboration in Dyadic Relationships Involving a Powerful Partner," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 49, pp. 42-65, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12011
  11. Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P., and Simchi-Levi, E., "Designing and Managing the Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies, and Case Studies," New York: McGraw-Hill, 2009.
  12. Lambert, D., Cooper, C., and Pagh, J., "Supply Chain Management: Implementation Issues and Research Opportunities," International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 1-20, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574099810805807
  13. Hong, K. S., Kim, N. Y., and Lee, D. H., "Strategic Operations Management," Kyung Moon Sa: Seoul, 2015.
  14. Kim. H. W. and Youn, S. H., “A Study on the Effects of Supply Chain Partnerships on Supply Chain Integration: The Marketing Role of Information Sharing and Information Quality,” Korean Production and Operations Management Society, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 183-207, 2005.
  15. Ju, K. J. and An, B. G., "The Relationship Among SCM, Operations Capabilities and Business Performance," Journal of the Korea Management Engineers Society, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp.173-189, 2012.
  16. Lee, D. H., "The effect of CSR Willingness and Sustainable SCM Enablers on Sustainable SCM Performance," Korean Production and Operations Management Society, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 123-147, 2015.
  17. IKEA Group Sustainability Summary.(2016). http://www.ikea.com/gb/en/doc/generaldocument/ikea-2015-sustainability-summary1364308472875.pdf
  18. Inter IKEA Systems, B. V., "IKEA range & supply," 2016. http://www.inter.ikea.com/en/interikea-group/ikea-range-and-supply/
  19. Shrivastava, P., "Ecocentric Management for a Risk Society," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 118-137, 1995. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271996
  20. Carter, C. and Roger, D. A., "Framework of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Moving Toward New Theory," International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 360-387, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030810882816
  21. Seuring, S. and Muller, M., "From a Literature Review to a Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Supply Chain Management," Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 16 No. 15, pp. 1699-1710, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020
  22. Hassini, E., Surti, C., and Searcy, C., "A Literature Review and a Case Study of Sustainable Supply Chains with a Focus on Metrics," International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 140 No. 1, pp. 69-82, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.042
  23. Lee, S. Y. and Lee, J. K., "Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Performance in the Global Supply Network: An Empirical Validation of Vietnamese Suppliers," The Korean Academic Association of Business Administration, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 453-468, 2016.
  24. Kim, J. Y., Lee, S. W., and Kim, S. H., "The Effects of the Relationship of Vendor with Parent Company on Organizational Performance: Mediating Roles of Cooperative Relationship Lasting Factor and Degree of Relationship Satisfaction," Korean Accounting Journal, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 239-271, 2013.
  25. Schwartz, M. and Carroll, A., "Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach," Business Ethics Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 503-530, 2003. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200313435
  26. Lee, M. S., Park, S. B., and Jun, I. W., "Analysis of the Relationship among Cooperative Personnel, Management Performance and a Win-Win Cooperation of Large and Small Businesses," Korea Logistics Research Association, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 347-371, 2011.
  27. Liu, Y., Huang, Y., Luo, Y., and Zhao, Y., "How Does Justice Matter in Achieving Buyer-Supplier Relationship Performance?," Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 355-367, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.03.003
  28. Park, G. W. and Park, K. T., "A Study on the Efficiency of Relationship Management between Buyers and Suppliers," Korea Productivity Association, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 157-194, 2012.
  29. Kim, S. H., "The Effects of Formulation and Implementation of Supply Chain Strategy on Collaboration Performance: Moderating Effects of Trust and Commitment," Korean Corporation Management Review, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 27-49, 2012.
  30. Dertouzos, M. L., Lester, R. K., and Solow, R. M., "Made in America: Regaining the Productive Edge," Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1989.
  31. Chang, H. S. and Kim, C. J., "The Effects of Inter-Organizational Relationship Characteristics on Supply Chain Agility: From the Supplier Perspective," The Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 187-214, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5859/KAIS.2012.21.3.187
  32. Moon, I. H. and Cho, J. H., "Experiencebased Training: POSCO, BMW, Louis Vuitton," Maeil Business News Korea, April 8, 2014. http://news.mk.co.kr/newsRead.php?year=2014&no=548076
  33. Myhr, N. and Spekman, R. E., "Collaborative Supply Chain Partnerships Built upon Trust and Electronically Mediated Exchange," Journal of Business &Industrial Marketing, Vol. 20 No. 4/5, pp. 179-186. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620510603855
  34. Frohlich, M. T. and Westbrook, R., "Arcs of Integration: An International Study of Supply Chain Strategies," Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 185-200. 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(00)00055-3
  35. Henderson, R. and Clark, K., "Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 9-30, 1990. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549
  36. Sanders, N., "Pattern of Information Technology use: The Impact on Buyer-Suppler Coordination and Performance," Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 349-367, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.07.003
  37. Lee, S., Lee, D., and Schniederjans, M., "Supply Chain Innovation and Organizational Performance in the Health Care Industry," International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 31 No. 11, pp. 1193-1214, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571111178493
  38. Villena, V., Revilla, E., and Choi, T., "The Dark Side of Buyer-Supplier Relationships: A Social Capital Perspective," Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 561-576, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.09.001
  39. De Felice, F., Petrillo, A., and Autorino, C., "Development of A Framework for Sustainable Outsourcing: Analytic Balanced Scorecard Method(A-BSC)," Sustainability, Vol. 7 No. 7, pp. 8399-8419, 2015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7078399
  40. Najmi, M. and Kehoe, D., "The Role of Performance Measurement Systems in Promoting Quality Development Beyond ISO 9000," International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 21 No. 1/2, pp. 159-172, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570110358512
  41. Westpac Group, "Sustainable Supply Chain Management Framework," Group Procurement, Group Operations, Property & Procurement, 2014. https://www.westpac.com.au/docs/pdf/aw/SSCM_Framework.pdf
  42. Kim, S., "Policy Issues on Win-Win Growth for Large Enterprises and SEMs," Korea Review of Applied Economics, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 71-97, 2011.
  43. Kim, S. H. and Lee, J. S., "The Effect of Partner Selection Criterion and CSFs on Performance in Supply Chain: Horizontal Collaboration between Traditional-Internet Firm," Korean Production and Operations Management Society, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 103-132, 2006.
  44. Sherer, S., "Critical Success Factors for Manufacturing Networks as Perceived by Network Coordinators," Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 325-345, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-627X.00086
  45. Green, K., Zelbst, P., Meacham, J., and Bhadauria, V., "Green Supply Chain Management Practices: Impact on Performance," Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 290-305, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211227126
  46. Yoon, H. K., "A Study on The Efficiency of Business and Curtailment of Cost through the SCM," Korea Logistics Research Association, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 129-147, 2001.
  47. Hoque, Z. and James, W., “Linking Balanced Scorecard Measures to Size and Market Factors: Impact on Organizational Performance,” Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1-17, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2000.12.1.1
  48. Sikdar, S. K., "Sustainable Development and Sustainability Metrics," American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal, Vol. 49 No. 8, pp. 1928-1932, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690490802
  49. Nunnally, J. C., "Psychometric Theory (2nd ed)," New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
  50. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F., “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 39-50, 1981. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  51. Chin, W. W., "The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling," In Marcoulides, G. A. (ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research, 295-336. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998.
  52. Cohen, J. O., "Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.)," New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.
  53. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., and Johnston, J. C., "Involuntary Covert Orienting is Contingent on Attentional Control Settings," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 1030-1044, 1992.
  54. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., and Lauro, C., "PLS Path Modeling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 159-205, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
  55. Efron, B. and Tibshirani, R., "Improvements on Cross Validation: The 0.632+ Bootstrapmethod," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 92 No. 438, pp. 548-560, 1997.
  56. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., and Sarstedt, M., "A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)," Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2013.
  57. The financial news, June 6, 2017. http://www.fnnews.com/news/201706061957559744
  58. Hoogland, J. and Boomsma, A., "Robustness Studies in Covariance Structure Modeling: An Overview and a Meta-Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 329-367, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124198026003003

Cited by

  1. 신제품 개발에서 신기술 및 모듈화 도입이 기업수익에 미치는 영향에 대한 분석 vol.24, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.9723/jksiis.2019.24.6.081