DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Theoretical axial wall angulation for rotational resistance form in an experimental-fixed partial denture

  • Received : 2016.10.07
  • Accepted : 2017.06.19
  • Published : 2017.08.31

Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of long base lengths of a fixed partial denture (FPD) to rotational resistance with variation of vertical wall angulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Trigonometric calculations were done to determine the maximum wall angle needed to resist rotational displacement of an experimental-FPD model in 2-dimensional plane. The maximum wall angle calculation determines the greatest taper that resists rotation. Two different axes of rotation were used to test this model with five vertical abutment heights of 3-, 3.5-, 4-, 4.5-, and 5-mm. The two rotational axes were located on the mesial-side of the anterior abutment and the distal-side of the posterior abutment. Rotation of the FPD around the anterior axis was counter-clockwise, Posterior-Anterior (P-A) and clockwise, Anterior-Posterior (A-P) around the distal axis in the sagittal plane. RESULTS. Low levels of vertical wall taper, ${\leq}10-degrees$, were needed to resist rotational displacement in all wall height categories; 2-to-6-degrees is generally considered ideal, with 7-to-10-degrees as favorable to the long axis of the abutment. Rotation around both axes demonstrated that two axial walls of the FPD resisted rotational displacement in each direction. In addition, uneven abutment height combinations required the lowest wall angulations to achieve resistance in this study. CONCLUSION. The vertical height and angulation of FPD abutments, two rotational axes, and the long base lengths all play a role in FPD resistance form.

Keywords

References

  1. Glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:69.
  2. Prothero JH. Prosthetetic dentistry. Chicago; Medico-Dental Publishing Co.; 1923. p. 1128.
  3. Dykema, RW, Goodacre CJ, Phillips RW. Johnston's modern practice in fixed prosthodontics. Philadelphia; Saunders; 1986. p. 22-7.
  4. Shillingburg HT, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of tooth preparations for cast metal and porcelain restorations. Chicago; Quintessence; 1987. p. 13-31.
  5. Malone FP, Koth DL. Tylman's theory and practice of fixed prosthodontics. 8th ed. St. Louis; Ishiyaku EuroAmerica; 1989. p. 113-43.
  6. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Fuijimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4th ed. St. Louis; Mosby; 2006. p. 226-57.
  7. Goodacre CJ, Campagni WV, Aquilino SA. Tooth preparations for complete crowns: an art form based on scientific principles. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:363-76. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114685
  8. Kaufman EG, Coelho DH, Colin L. Factors influencing the retention of cemented gold castings. J Prosthet Dent 1961;11:487-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(61)90232-3
  9. Nicholls JI. Crown retention. Part I. Stress analysis of symmetric restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1974;31:179-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(74)90053-5
  10. Hegdahl T, Silness J. Preparation areas resisting displacement of artificial crowns. J Oral Rehabil 1977;4:201-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1977.tb00984.x
  11. Woolsey GD, Matich JA. The effect of axial grooves on the resistance form of cast restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;97:978-80. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1978.0429
  12. Mack PJ. A theoretical and clinical investigation into the taper achieved on crown and inlay preparations. J Oral Rehabil 1980;7:255-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1980.tb00443.x
  13. Potts RG, Shillingburg HT Jr, Duncanson MG Jr. Retention and resistance of preparations for cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:303-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(80)90406-0
  14. Weed RM, Baez RJ. A method for determining adequate resistance form of complete cast crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:330-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(84)90437-2
  15. Dodge WW, Weed RM, Baez RJ, Buchanan RN. The effect of convergence angle on retention and resistance form. Quintessence Int 1985;16:191-4.
  16. Zuckerman GR. Factors that influence the mechanical retention of the complete crown. Int J Prosthodont 1988;1:196-200.
  17. Zuckerman GR. Resistance form for the complete veneer crown: principles of design and analysis. Int J Prosthodont 1988;1:302-7.
  18. Parker MH, Gunderson RB, Gardner FM, Calverley MJ. Quantitative determination of taper adequate to provide resistance form: concept of limiting taper. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:281-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90173-4
  19. Nordlander J, Weir D, Stoffer W, Ochi S. The taper of clinical preparations for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:148-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90304-6
  20. Zuckerman GR. Analysis of resistance and retention of complete veneer crown retainers. Quintessence Int 1990;21:629-35.
  21. Parker MH, Malone KH 3rd, Trier AC, Striano TS. Evaluation of resistance form for prepared teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:730-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90404-K
  22. Parker MH, Calverley MJ, Gardner FM, Gunderson RB. New guidelines for preparation taper. J Prosthodont 1993;2:61-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1993.tb00383.x
  23. Kamposiora P, Papavasilious G, Bayne SC, Felton DA. Finite element analysis estimates of cement microfracture under complete veneer crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:435-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90179-1
  24. Wiskott HW, Nicholls JI, Belser UC. The relationship between abutment taper and resistance of cemented crowns to dynamic loading. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:117-39.
  25. Wiskott HW, Nicholls JI, Belser UC. The effect of tooth preparation height and diameter on the resistance of complete crowns to fatigue loading. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:207-15.
  26. Augereau D, Renault P, Pierrisnard L, Barquins M. Threedimensional finite element analysis of the retention of fixed partial dentures. Clin Oral Investig 1997;1:141-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840050025
  27. Trier AC, Parker MH, Cameron SM, Brousseau JS. Evaluation of resistance form of dislodged crowns and retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:405-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70003-4
  28. Wiskott HW, Krebs C, Scherrer SS, Botsis J, Belser UC. Compressive and tensile zones in the cement interface of full crowns: a technical note on the concept of resistance. J Prosthodont 1999;8:80-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1999.tb00016.x
  29. Zidan O, Ferguson GC. The retention of complete crowns prepared with three different tapers and luted with four different cements. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:565-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00182-3
  30. Proussaefs P, Campagni W, Bernal G, Goodacre C, Kim J. The effectiveness of auxiliary features on a tooth preparation with inadequate resistance form. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:33-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.10.005
  31. Parker MH. Resistance form in tooth preparation. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:387-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2003.12.009
  32. Bowley JF, Sun AF, Barouch KK. Effect of margin location on crown preparation resistance form. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:546-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.09.006
  33. Cameron SM, Morris WJ, Keesee SM, Barsky TB, Parker MH. The effect of preparation taper on the retention of cemented cast crowns under lateral fatigue loading. J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:456-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.03.021
  34. Bowley JF, Kieser J. Axial-wall inclination angle and vertical height interactions in molar full crown preparations. J Dent 2007;35:117-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.06.002
  35. Bowley JF, Lai WF. Surface area improvement with grooves and boxes in mandibular molar crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:436-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60142-5
  36. Bowley JF, Ichim IP, Kieser JA, Swain MV. FEA evaluation of the resistance form of a premolar crown. J Prosthodont 2013;22:304-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00949.x
  37. Lial ML, Schneider DI, Hornsby EJ. College algebra and trigonometry. New York: Addison-Wesley; 2004. p. 472-531.