DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study of Mounding Classification Analysis & Scale Calculation in Waterside Parks and Green Areas

수변 공원녹지의 마운딩 유형 및 규모산정 연구

  • Received : 2017.06.09
  • Accepted : 2017.08.14
  • Published : 2017.08.31

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the physical form of planting foundation of the parks and green spaces in the waterside of Korea and classified them into groups showing common features. It was clssified into 7 kinds of parks and green spaces of 27 waterside parks in Korea including landscape, ecology, art, shields, site boundaries, windbreaks, and soundproofing. As a result, the study was carried out on the detailed type and size estimation through the sampling survey of planting foundation of landscape and ecological type mounding which can be statistically analyzed. Landscape and ecological mounding have the characteristics of securing the ecological stability of the waterside planting areas and the diversity of planting landscape. It is possible to create a green landscape through various terrain changes such as enclosing, focusing, and panoramic view. The physical characteristics of ecological and landscape type mounding can be expressed as height, width, and length And physical data can appear in various forms and sizes depending on the purpose and function of the buffer effect of the land use in the waterside planting areas, the landscape creation, the ecological buffer. In this study, the range of the physical scale for landscape and ecological mounding of waterside parks and green spaces was calculated. The range of the mounding height was analyzed to be less than 1.25m and more than 1.25m and the average height was 0.74~1.08m and 1.75~2.75m respectively. In addition, the range of width of mounding was less than 6.13m, 6.13~17.5m, and more than 17.5m, and the average width of each was 3.45~4.95m, 7.05~10.85m and 31.54~51.54m respectively. The range for the length of mounding was less than 50m, 50~500m, and more than 500m. The mean length of each mounding was 34.0m, 116.3m and 955.8m. It is difficult to distinguish the difference between the waterside planting areas and the urban greenery in the purpose and function of landscape and ecological mounding. However, considering the average distance of 60m from the waterside and the average height of 1.26m, we can conclud that opened planting foundation is prefered to high mounding designs in waterside planting areas. It is expected that the results presented for the improvement of the logical and spatial value of the waterside parks and green areas planting foundation design can be served as the basic data helpful for practical application in landscape architecture planning and design.

Keywords

References

  1. Ban SH and Oh CH. 2010. A Development of Landscape Ecological Model for Priority Setting Green Space on Riparian Zone. Journal of Environment and Ecology. 20(2): 113-117. (in Korean with English summary)
  2. Choi KS and Lee SS. 2014. Landscape Structural Design & Construction: Ilchokak. pp. 109-112. (in Korean with English summary)
  3. Housing Research Institute. 2000. A Guideline for Planting Design and Construction in the Reclaimed Seaside Areas: Korea National Housing Corporation. (in Korean with English summary)
  4. Jo HK and Ahn TW. 2012. Landscape Preferences for Greenspace Structures. Journal of Forest Science. 28(1): 56-62.
  5. Jun HS. 2011. The Analysis of Physical and Chemistry Properties on the Reclaimed Area for Replantation-A Case Study on the YOULCHON 1'st Industrial Complex. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 14(6):87-95. (in Korean with English summary)
  6. Nam BH et al. 2008. Plant Distributions and Physicochemical Characteristics of Topsoil on the Reclaimed Dredging Area. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 36(3): 52-62. (in Korean with English summary)
  7. Son YH and Yoon MY. 2011. Types of Green Landscapes in a Suburban City Perceptions of Local Residents. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 39(5): 101-110. (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2011.39.5.101
  8. The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2016. Landscape architecture planting design: Munundang. (in Korean with English summary)
  9. The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2014. Landscape Architecture Construction Standard Specification. (in Korean with English summary)
  10. The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture. 2013. Landscpae Architecture Design Criteria pp 83-88, 112-125. (in Korean with English summary)
  11. www.moleg.go.kr