DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

농촌지역 초·중등 교육시설에 대한 마을단위 접근성 평가

Evaluation of Accessibility to Elementary and Secondary Educational Facilities on Village Level in Rural Areas

  • 김솔희 (서울대학교 그린바이오과학기술연구원) ;
  • 김태곤 (미국 미네소타대학교, 환경연구소) ;
  • 서교 (서울대학교 국제농업기술대학원, 서울대학교 그린바이오과학기술연구원)
  • Kim, Solhee (Institute of Green Bio Science & Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Taegon (The NorthStar Initiative for Sustainable Enterprise (NiSE), Institute on the Environment, University of Minnesota) ;
  • Suh, Kyo (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology, Seoul National University, Institute of Green Bio Science & Technology, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2017.07.04
  • 심사 : 2017.08.25
  • 발행 : 2017.08.30

초록

Although the educational facility are an important considerations on a social equity standpoint, educational environment in rural areas has been continuously deteriorated by numerous social problems such as decreasing birth rate and increasing of local school closing. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accessibility of educational environment in rural areas on village level. First, we evaluate physical accessibility based on legally defined commuting distance. Second, the implication of village population of potential accessibility is analyzed. Lastly, the facility centrality index of each village is estimated for assessing the relations of educational accessibility. The main results of this study are as follows; (1) The accessibility of most villages in Pyeongchang-gun is vulnerable that 81.10% for elementary school, 73.17% for middle school, and 82.32% for high school, respectively; (2) The average commuting distance per student considering estimated number of students for each educational facilities indicated 2.75km for elementary school, 4.37km for middle school, and 5.79km for high school; (3) the facility centrality index is highly correlated to educational facilities but not to village population.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chin, H., Park, M., Yoon, D., 2014, Evaluating Accessibilities to Village Community Centers via Rural Amenity Resources Information, Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 20(2): 57-69. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2014.20.2.057
  2. Choi, E., 2007, The Differentiation of Education Environment by Region, Journal of Korean Association of Space & Environment Research, 27: 150-171.
  3. Jeon, J., Park, M., Kim, E., Choi, J., Lim, C., 2017, Analysis of Central Place and Hinterland using Linear programming and Probability Model of Huff, Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 23(1): 53-63. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2017.23.1.053
  4. Jeon, J., Park, M., Yoon, S., Suh, K., Kim, E., 2017, Calculation of Road Circuity Factors considering Public Facilities and Road Condition in Rural Area, Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 23(2): 55-65. https://doi.org/10.7851/Ksrp.2017.23.2.055
  5. Jeong, C., 2002, A Study on the Educational Exchange Programs between Urban-Rural Elementary Schools, Community Development Review, 28(2): 19-34.
  6. Kim, H., Lee, S., Cho, D., 2011, An Analysis of Spatial Equity and Location Efficiency of Public Healthcare Facilities in Rural Areas. Journal of Rural Development. 34(4): 1-24.
  7. Kim, S., Kim, T., Suh, K., 2015. Assessment of Accessibility to Medical Facilities in Rural Areas using Real Road Distance focusing on Pyeongchang-gun, Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers, 57(4): 39-49. https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2015.57.4.039
  8. Kim, S., Kim, T., Suh, K., 2016, Analysis of the Implication of Accessibility to Community Facilities for Land Price in Rural Areas using a Hedonic Land Price Model, Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 22(1): 93-100. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2016.22.1.093
  9. Korean Educational Development Institute, 2014, Standards and Methods of Educational Environment Evaluation, Korean Educational Development Institute.
  10. Lee, D., 2012, A Study on the Spatial Inequality of Educational Opportunity in an Urban Area: Focusing on the Opportunity to Learn English by School Native English Instructors, Journal of Korean Association of Space & Environment Research, 22(1): 81-113.
  11. Lee, H. and Dong, J., 2011. A Study on the Student Walking Distance for Efficient New School Arrangement in Urban Housing Site, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 27(6): 77-84.
  12. Lee, J., Cho, S., Jeong, I., 2013. Potential Accessibility of Public Healthcare Facilities in Rural Areas, Journal of Agricultural Extension & Community Development, 20(2): 431-450. https://doi.org/10.12653/jecd.2013.20.2.0431
  13. Lin, J., Huang, Y., Ho, C., 2014, School Accessibility and Academic Achievement in a Rural Area of Taiwan, Children's Geographies, 12(2): 232-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.812308
  14. Ma, S., 2010, The Actual Conditions of Utilization of Closed School and Policy Tasks in Rural Areas, Research Policy Report P134.
  15. Ministry of Education, 2017, Current School Status, School Alimi. Available at: http://www.schoolinfo.go.kr/
  16. Park, S. and Yeom, D., 2016. A Study on Resident's Awareness of Public Space in the Center of Rural Areas -Focusing on Main Street and Public Facilities of Local Community Unit-, Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea, 18(2):87-96.
  17. Pyeongchang County, Pyeongchang Statistics Service, Available at: http://stat.happy700.or.kr/
  18. Pyeongchang County, 2017, Households and Population by Tong and Ri(Cont'd)(Recent year), HAPPY 700 Pyeongchang Statistics Service, Available at: http://stat.happy700.or.kr/
  19. Statistics Korea, 2017, Population Census, Korean Statistical Information Service, Available at: http://kosis.kr/
  20. Talen, E., 2001, School, Community, and Spatial Equity: An Empirical Investigation of Access to Elementary Schools in West Virginia, Annuals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(3): 465-486. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00254
  21. Woo, J., 2002, The Distributional Characteristics of High Schools in Daegu Viewing from Public Service Facilities, Journal of the Korean Association of Regional Geographers, 8(3): 314-325.