DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Assessment of the Secondary Neutron Dose in the Passive Scattering Proton Beam Facility of the National Cancer Center

  • 투고 : 2016.08.11
  • 심사 : 2016.12.05
  • 발행 : 2017.08.25

초록

The purpose of this study is to assess the additional neutron effective dose during passive scattering proton therapy. Monte Carlo code (Monte Carlo N-Particle 6) simulation was conducted based on a precise modeling of the National Cancer Center's proton therapy facility. A three-dimensional neutron effective dose profile of the interior of the treatment room was acquired via a computer simulation of the 217.8-MeV proton beam. Measurements were taken with a $^3He$ neutron detector to support the simulation results, which were lower than the simulation results by 16% on average. The secondary photon dose was about 0.8% of the neutron dose. The dominant neutron source was deduced based on flux calculation. The secondary neutron effective dose per proton absorbed dose ranged from $4.942{\pm}0.031mSv/Gy$ at the end of the field to $0.324{\pm}0.006mSv/Gy$ at 150 cm in axial distance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Particle Therapy Co-Operative Group (PTCOG) statistics, Available from: http://www.ptcog.ch/index.php/facilities-in-operation.
  2. D.R. Olsen, O.S. Bruland, G. Frykholm, I.N. Norderhaug, Proton therapy - a systematic review of clinical effectiveness, Radiother. Oncol. 83 (2007) 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.03.001
  3. X.G. Xu, B. Bednarz, H. Paganetti, A review of dosimetry studies on external-beam radiation treatment with respect to second cancer induction, Phys. Med. Biol. 53 (2008) R193-R241. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/13/R01
  4. C.Z. Jarlskog, H. Paganetti, Risk of developing second cancer from neutron dose in proton therapy as function of field characteristics, organ and patient age, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 72 (2008) 228-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.069
  5. National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements (NCRP), Radiation Protection for Particle Accelerator Facilities, NCRP Report 144, 2003.
  6. A.M. Koehler, R.J. Schneider, J.M. Sisterson, Flattening of proton dose distributions for large-field radiotherapy, Med. Phys. 4 (1977) 297-301. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.594317
  7. E. Grusell, A. Montelius, A. Brahme, G. Rikner, K. Russell, A general solution to charged particle beam flattening using an optimized dual-scattering-foil technique, with application to proton therapy beams, Phys. Med. Biol. 39 (1994) 2201-2216. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/39/12/005
  8. Th. Haberer, W. Becher, D. Schardt, G. Kraft, Magnetic scanning system for heavy ion therapy, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A330 (1993) 296-305.
  9. E. Pedroni, R. Bacher, H. Blattmann, T. Bohringer, A. Coray, A. Lomax, S. Lin, G. Munkel, S. Scheib, U. Schneider, A. Tourovsky, The 200-MeV proton therapy project at the Paul Scherrer Institute: conceptual design and practical realization, Med. Phys. 22 (1995) 37. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597522
  10. X. Yan, U. Titt, A.M. Koehler, W.D. Newhauser, Measurement of neutron dose equivalent to proton therapy patients outside of the proton radiation field, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 476 (2002) 429-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)01483-8
  11. S.C. Roy, G.A. Sandison, Scattered neutron dose equivalent to a fetus from proton therapy of the mother, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 71 (2004) 997-998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2004.05.025
  12. J.C. Polf, W.D. Newhauser, Calculations of neutron dose equivalent exposures from range-modulated proton therapy beams, Phys. Med. Biol. 50 (2005) 3859-3873. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/50/16/014
  13. G. Mesoloras, G.A. Sandison, R.D. Stewart, J.B. Farr, W.C. His, Neutron scattered dose equivalent to a fetus from proton radiotherapy of the mother, Med. Phys. 33 (2006) 2479. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2207147
  14. R. Tayama, Y. Fujita, M. Tadokoro, H. Fujimaki, T. Sakae, T. Terunuma, Measurement of neutron dose distribution for a passive scattering nozzle at the Proton Medical Research Center (PMRC), Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 564 (2006) 532-536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2006.04.028
  15. A. Wroe, A. Rosenfeld, R. Schulte, Out-of-field dose equivalents delivered by proton therapy of prostate cancer, Med. Phys. 34 (2007) 3449. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.2759839
  16. Y. Zheng, W. Newhauser, J. Fontenot, P. Taddei, R. Mohan, Monte Carlo study of neutron dose equivalent during passive scattering proton therapy, Phys. Med. Biol. 52 (2007) 4481-4496. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/52/15/008
  17. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), MCNP6 User's Manual Version 1.0, 2008.
  18. National Institute of Standard and Technology (NIST), PSTAR program, Available from: http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Star/Text/PSTAR.html.
  19. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Absorbed Dose Determination in External Beam Radiotherapy, Technical Reports Series no. 398, 2000.
  20. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), Conversion Coefficients for Use in Radiological Protection Against External Radiation, 74, ICRP Pub, 1997.
  21. R.H. Olsher, H.H. Hsu, A. Beverding, J.H. Kleck, W.H. Casson, D.G. Vasilik, R.T. Devine, WENDI: an improved neutron rem meter, Health Phys. 79 (2000) 170-181. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-200008000-00010

피인용 문헌

  1. Independent application of an analytical model for secondary neutron equivalent dose produced in a passive-scattering proton therapy treatment unit vol.63, pp.15, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aad1bc
  2. MCNPX를 이용한 양성자 치료기의 구성품에서 발생하는 중성자 에너지 분포계산 vol.13, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7742/jksr.2019.13.7.917
  3. Technical commissioning of the spot scanning system in Shanghai Proton Therapy Facility vol.4, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41605-019-0148-5
  4. Neutron dose and its measurement in proton therapy-current State of Knowledge vol.93, pp.1107, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190412
  5. ASSESSMENT OF AMBIENT NEUTRON DOSE EQUIVALENT IN SPATIALLY FRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY WITH PROTONS USING PHYSICAL COLLIMATORS vol.189, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaa030
  6. 몬테칼로 시뮬레이션을 활용한 양성자가속기 단기사용 시 구성품의 방사화 평가 vol.43, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.17946/jrst.2020.43.5.389