감성과학 (Science of Emotion and Sensibility)

  • 제20권2호
  • /
  • Pages.87-102
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1226-8593(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2383-613X(eISSN)
한국감성과학회 (Korean Society for Emotion and Sensibility)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

무료공개 3D모델링 소프트웨어 사용자 경험 분석을 통한 교육용 3D모델링 소프트웨어 개발유형 제안

A Proposal of Educational 3D Modelling Software Development Type Via User Experience Analysis of Open Source 3D Modelling Software

  • 이국희 (이화여자대학교 융합디자인연구소) ;
  • 조재경 (이화여자대학교 디자인학부)
  • Lee, Guk-Hee (Design Convergence Research Center, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Cho, Jaekyung (Division of Design, Ewha Womans University)
  • 투고 : 2016.11.09
  • 심사 : 2017.02.22
  • 발행 : 2017.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

3D프린팅에 대한 관심이 증가함에 따라, 3D프린팅에 선행되어야 할 3D모델링 교육에 대한 관심으로 증가하고 있다. 그러나 현존하는 3D모델링 소프트웨어들은 대부분 외국 브랜드에서 개발하였고, 이에 따라 인터페이스가 모두 영어되어 있기에 이러한 용어에 익숙하지 않은 한국인 입문자들을 대상으로 3D모델링 소프트웨어 교육을 수행하기에는 제약이 있다. 본 연구는 이러한 현실을 반영하면서 3D프린팅을 위한 한국형 3D모델링 교육용 소프트웨어를 개발할 때 고려해야할 사항이 무엇인지 탐색하기 위해 이루어졌다. 이를 위해 3D모델링 경험이 없는 사람들로 하여금 입문자들의 접근이 용이하다고 알려진 대표적인 무료공개 3D모델링 소프트웨어 123D Design나 Tinker CAD 중 하나로 집만들기 과제를 수행하게 한 후, 이에 대한 설문을 진행하였다. 결과적으로 Tinker CAD에 대한 사용자 경험이 123D Design에 대한 것보다 호의적이고, 전자를 경험하면서 발생한 오류가 후자를 경험하면서 발생한 오류보다 적으며, 전자에서 과업을 완료한 사람의 비율이 후자에서 과업을 완료한 사람의 비율보다 높음을 확인할 수 있었다. 종합논의에서는 Tinker CAD의 특성(입체도형을 통해 쉽게 모델링 가능)과 웹 기반 구동방식을 적용한 입문자 교육용 3D모델링 소프트웨어 개발 및 123D Design의 특성(세밀한 치수조작과 도형정렬 가능)과 윈도우 기반 구동방식을 적용한 초?중급자 교육용 3D모델링 소프트웨어 개발을 제안하였다.

With increasing interest in 3D printing, the interest in the 3D modelling training that should precede the 3D printing is increasing. However, the existing 3D modelling software is developed mostly by foreign brands. Thus, the interfaces are all in English. 3D modelling software training for Korean novices who are not familiar with these terms has constraints. This study aims to explore what to consider when developing a Korean model for 3D modelling educational software for 3D printing in the face of such reality. For this goal, after having novices with no experience in 3D modeling to perform a house building task using either 12D Design or Tinker CAD, we conducted a survey. It was found in the result that more users favored Tinker CAD over 123D Design, and the errors involved while working with the Tinker CAD were less than those with the 123D Design, and the ratio of people who completed the task with the Tinker CAD was higher than that with the 123D Design. In general discussion, an introductory level educational 3D modeling software development is proposed which utilize characteristics of Tinker CAD (easy modelling is possible by three-dimensional figures) and web-based method. Also, a beginner/intermediate level educational 3D modeling software development is proposed which utilize characteristics of 123D Design (with finer measurement manipulations and figure alignment) and Windows-based method.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bradburn, N. M., & Mason, W. M. (1964). The effect of question order on responses. Journal of Marketing Research, 1(4), 57-61. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150380
  2. Go, H. (2016). 3D printing technology(3D프린팅의 기술). In D. Choi (Ed.), 3D printing to change the future (미래를 바꿀 3D프린팅)(pp. 91-108). Seoul, Seoul: Information Publishing Group.
  3. Kaufmann, H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2003). Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality. Computers & Graphics, 27(3), 339-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0097-8493(03)00028-1
  4. Kim, E., Hong, C., & Hong, J. (2007). Relationship between children s design creativity and TTCTs creativity: A basic research on evaluation for developing children’s design creativity. Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 10(3), 433-441.
  5. Kim, G. J. (2015). Human-computer interaction: Fundamentals and practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  6. Lee, G., & Cho, J. (2016). User experience analysis on 3D printing services and service direction suggestions (3D프린팅 서비스에 대한 사용자 경험 분석과 서비스 방향제안). Journal of the HCI Society of Korea, 11(1), 47-55. https://doi.org/10.17210/jhsk.2016.05.11.1.47
  7. Lee, G., & Choi, H. (2017). Preparatory research prior to the development of consumer-tailored 3D printing service platform (소비자 맞춤형 삼차원 프린팅 서비스 플랫폼 개발을 위한 탐색). Science of Emotion and Sensibility, 20(1), 3-16.
  8. Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 44-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90004-3
  9. Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Book.
  10. Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986). User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  11. Rayna, T., & Striukova, L. (2016). From rapid prototyping to home fabrication: How 3D printing is changing business model innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102(C), 214-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.07.023
  12. Roh, S. (2016). STL file and 3D CAD(STL 파일과 3D CAD). In S. Roh (Ed.), 3D printer practical user guide book(3D 프린터 실무활용 가이드북)(pp. 122-159). Seoul, Seoul: Mechapia.
  13. Sherman, L. M. (2009). Additive manufacturing: New capabilities for rapid prototypes and production parts. Plastic Technology, 55(3), 35-45.
  14. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9-20.
  15. Song, M. J., Ha, E., Kim, H. J., & Cho, J. (2016). A perspective on the domestic 3D printing marketplaces through investigations into online 3D printing platforms(해외 온라인 3D 프린팅 플랫폼 분석을 통한 국내 온라인 3D 프린팅 마켓플레이스 전망). Journal of Basic Design & Art, 17(4), 163-174.
  16. Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Schwarz, N. (1988). Priming and communication: Social determinants of information use in judgments of life satisfaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(5), 429-442. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180505
  17. Unver, E., Paul, A., & Dave, T. (2006). Applying 3D scanning and modeling in transport design education. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 3(1-4), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2006.10738440