DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Glucose recovery from different corn stover fractions using dilute acid and alkaline pretreatment techniques

  • Aboagye, D. (Department of Agricultural and Bio-Systems Engineering, Makerere University) ;
  • Banadda, N. (Department of Agricultural and Bio-Systems Engineering, Makerere University) ;
  • Kambugu, R. (Department of Agricultural and Bio-Systems Engineering, Makerere University) ;
  • Seay, J. (College of Engineering, University of Kentucky) ;
  • Kiggundu, N. (Department of Agricultural and Bio-Systems Engineering, Makerere University) ;
  • Zziwa, A. (Department of Agricultural and Bio-Systems Engineering, Makerere University) ;
  • Kabenge, I. (Department of Agricultural and Bio-Systems Engineering, Makerere University)
  • 투고 : 2017.02.20
  • 심사 : 2017.07.07
  • 발행 : 2017.07.31

초록

Background: Limited availability of corn stover due to the competing uses (organic manure, animal feed, bio-materials, and bioenergy) presents a major concern for its future in the bio-economy. Furthermore, biomass research has exhibited different results due to the differences in the supply of enzymes and dissimilar analytical methods. The effect of the two leading pretreatment techniques (dilute acid and alkaline) on glucose yield from three corn stover fractions (cob, stalk, and leaf) sourced from a single harvest in Uganda were studied at temperatures 100, 120, 140, and $160^{\circ}C$ over reaction times of 5, 10, 30, and 60 min. Results: From this study, the highest glucose concentrations obtained from the dilute acid (DA) pretreated cobs, stalks, and leaves were 18.4 g/L (66.8% glucose yield), 16.2 g/L (64.1% glucose yield), and 11.0 g/L (49.5% glucose yield), respectively. The optimal pretreatment settings needed to obtain these yields from the DA pretreated samples were at a temperature of $160^{\circ}C$ over an incubation time of 30 min. The highest glucose concentrations obtained from the alkaline (AL) pretreated cobs, stalks, and leaves were 24.7 g/L (81.73% glucose yield), 21.3 g/L (81.23% glucose yield), and 15.0 g/L (51.92% glucose yield), respectively. To be able to achieve these yields, the optimal pretreatment settings for the cobs and stalks were $140^{\circ}C$ and for a retention time of 30 min, while the leaves require optimal conditions of $140^{\circ}C$ and for a retention time of 60 min. Conclusions: The study recommends that the leaves could be left on the field during harvesting since the recovery of glucose from the pretreated cobs and stalks is higher.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aden, A., & Foust, T. (2009). Technoeconomic analysis of the dilute sulfuric acid and enzymatic hydrolysis process for the conversion of corn stover to ethanol. Cellulose, 16, 535-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9327-8
  2. Adney, William S, E Michael E Himmel, David K Johnson, and E Mark F Davis. 2009. "Can Delignification Decrease Cellulose Digestibility in Acid Pretreated Corn Stover ?": Cellulose, 16(4), 677-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-009-9313-1
  3. Amenaghawon, A. N., et al. (2013). Statistical optimisation of dilute acid pre-treatment of corn stover using response surface methodology. Journal of Environment, 2(2), 34-40.
  4. Anne, K. (2014). Development of pretreatment technology and enzymatic hydrolysis for biorefineries. Finland: Aalto University School of Chemical Technology.
  5. Arana-cuenca, A., Sergio, A., Medina, M., & Octavio, L.-c. (2014). Effect of biological and chemical pre-treatment on the hydrolysis of corn leaf. bioresources.com, 9(2008), 6861-6875.
  6. Axelsson, X. (2011). Separate hydrolysis and fermentation of pretreated spruce (pp. 1-48). Linkoping: Master Thesis Linkoping University. https://www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:427842/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
  7. Bandikari, R., Poondla, V., & Obulam, V. S. R. (2014). Enhanced production of xylanase by solid state fermentation using Trichoderma koeningi isolate: effect of pretreated agro-residues. 3 Biotech, 4(6), 655-664. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13205-014-0239-4.
  8. Barten Ty, J., & Ty Jason, B. (2013). Evaluation and prediction of corn stover biomass and composition from commercially available corn hybrids by.
  9. Behera, S., Richa, A., Nandhagopal, N., & Kumar, S. (2014). Importance of chemical pretreatment for bioconversion of. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews journal, 36, 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.04.047
  10. Bengtsson, O., Gorwa-grauslund, M. F., & Karin, O. (2006). Simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation of glucose and xylose in steampretreated corn stover at high fiber content with Saccharomyces cerevisiae TMB3400. Journal of Biotechnology, 126, 488-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.05.001
  11. Bon Elba, P. S., & Maria Antonieta, F. (2013). Bioethanol production via enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass (pp. 1-11).
  12. Cai, D., et al. (2016). Effect of dilute alkaline pretreatment on the conversion of different parts of corn stalk to fermentable sugars and its application in acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation. Bioresource Technology, 211, 117-124. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960852416303704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.076
  13. Chen, J. Z., & Xia, L. (2009). Comparison of four different chemical pretreatments of corn stover for enhancing enzymatic digestibility. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33(10), 1381-1385. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.025.
  14. Chen, Y., et al. (2013). Understanding of alkaline pretreatment parameters for corn stover enzymatic saccharification. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 6(1), 8. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3575303&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-8
  15. Cui, Z., et al. (2012). Enzymatic digestibility of corn stover fractions in response to fungal pretreatment. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 51(21), 7153-7159. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie300487z
  16. Dominguez, J. M., Ningjun, C., Gongh, C. S., & Tsaoh, G. T. (1997). Dilute acid hemicellulose hydrolysates from corn cobs for xylitol production by yeast. Bioresource Technology, 61(1), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(97)84703-7
  17. Gao, X., & Lars, R. (2014). ABE fermentation from enzymatic hydrolysate of NaOHpretreated corncobs. Biomass and Bioenergy, 66, 2-7. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe. 2014.03.002.
  18. Gao, et al. (2014). Research on hydrolysis and saccharification of corn stover. China Petroleum Processing and Petrochemical Technology, 16(2), 40-45.
  19. Garlock, R. J., Chundawat, S. P., Balan, V., & Dale, B. E. (2009). Optimizing harvest of corn stover fractions based on overall sugar yields following ammonia fiber expansion pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2(1), 29. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19930679. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-2-29
  20. Ghose, T. K. (1987). International union of pure commission on biotechnology-- measurement of cellulase activities. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 59(2), 257-268. http://www.iupac.org/publications/pac/1987/pdf/5902x0257.pdf. https://doi.org/10.1351/pac198759020257
  21. Girisuta, et al. (2008). Experimental and kinetic modelling studies on the acidcatalysed hydrolysis of the water hyacinth plant to levulinic acid. Biores Tech, 99(17), 8367-8375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.045
  22. Hames, B., et al. (2008). Preparation of samples for compositional analysis laboratory analytical procedure (LAP) issue date : 8/06/2008 preparation of samples for compositional analysis laboratory analytical procedure (LAP). http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/analytical_procedures.html (July 29, 2015).
  23. Hanway, J. J. (1963). Growth stages of corn (Zea Mays, L.). Agronomy Journal, 55(5), 487-492. http://www.ipm.iastate.edu/ipm/icm/2007/8-6/nutrients.html (January 10, 2016). https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1963.00021962005500050024x
  24. Hart, Peter, W., & Rudie, A. W. (2012). The bleaching of pulp (5 Thth ed.).
  25. Hendriks, A. (2008). Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology, 100(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.05.027
  26. Heyne, S., & Harvey, S. (2013). Assessment of the energy and economic performance of second generation biofuel production processes using energy market scenarios. Applied Energy, 101, 203-212. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.03.034.
  27. Idrees, M., et al. (2013). Experimental runs optimization of dilute acid pretreatment of water hyacinth biomass for enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol production. EXCLI Journal, 2013, 30-40.
  28. Idrees, M., Adnan, A., & Qureshi, F. A. (2014). Comparison of acid and alkali catalytic efficiency during enzymatic saccharification of corncob and lactic acid production. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 51(4), 1049-1058. http://pakjas.com.pk/papers/2376.pdf.
  29. Jeevan, P., Nelson, R., & Edith Rena, A. (2011). Optimization studies on acid hydrolysis of corn cob hemicellulosic hydrolysate for microbial production of xylitol. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Research, 1(4), 114-123.
  30. Jin, Y., Huang, T., Geng, W., & Yang, L. (2013). Comparison of sodium carbonate pretreatment for enzymatic hydrolysis of wheat straw stem and leaf to produce fermentable sugars. Bioresource Technology, 137, 294-301. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.140.
  31. Kaar, W. E., & Holtzapple, M. T. (2000). Using lime pretreatment to facilitate the enzymic hydrolysis of corn stover. Biomass and Bioenergy, 18(3), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00091-4
  32. Kang, Qian, Lise Appels, Tianwei Tan, and Raf Dewil. (2014). "Bioethanol from Lignocellulosic Biomass : Current Findings Determine Research Priorities." Scientific World Journal, 2014, 1-13.
  33. Karimi, K., Kheradmandinia, S., & Taherzadeh, M. J. (2006). Conversion of rice straw to sugars by dilute-acid hydrolysis. Biomass and Bioenergy, 30(3), 247-253. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953405001996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.11.015
  34. Karp et al. 2014. Alkaline pretreatment of corn stover: bench-scale fractionation and stream characterization. Sustainable chemistry and Engineering.
  35. Klass, D. L. (1985). Energy and biomass and wastes: a review and 1983 update. Resources and Conservation, 11, 157-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-3097(85)90001-X
  36. Lee, J. W., et al. (2007). Biological pretreatment of softwood Pinus densiflora by three white Rot fungi.pdf. Journal of Microbilogy, 45(6), 485-491.
  37. Li, Q., et al. (2012). Comparison of different alkali-based pretreatments of corn stover for improving enzymatic saccharification. Bioresource Technology, 125, 193-199. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.095.
  38. Li, P., et al. (2016). Effect of acid pretreatment on different parts of corn stalk for second generation ethanol production. Bioresource Technology, 206, 86-92. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.077.
  39. Lloyd, Todd A, and Charles E Wyman. (2005). "Combined Sugar Yields for Dilute Sulfuric Acid Pretreatment of Corn Stover Followed by Enzymatic Hydrolysis of the Remaining Solids." 96: 1967-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.01.011
  40. Manzoor, A., et al. (2012). Dilute sulfuric acid : a cheap acid for optimization. Sci Int, 24(1), 41-45.
  41. Maurice, Michelle L. 2011. Factors effecting ethanol fermentation via simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Worcester Polytechnic Institute.
  42. Mcaloon, A., et al. (2000). Determining the cost of producing ethanol from corn starch and lignocellulosic feedstocks determining the cost of producing ethanol from corn starch and lignocellulosic (National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP-580-28893).
  43. Miller, G. L. (1958). Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry, 31(3), 426-428. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030
  44. Modenbach, A. (2013). Sodium hydroxide pretreatment of corn stover and subsequent enzymatic hydrolysis: an investigation of yields, kinetic modeling and glucose recovery. Lexington: University of Kentucky.
  45. Montross, & Crofcheck, C. L. (2004). Effect of stover fraction and storage method on glucose production during enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresource Technology, 92(3), 269-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.09.007
  46. Obama, P., Ricochon, G., Muniglia, L., & Brosse, N. (2012). Bioresource technology combination of enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol organosolv pretreatments: effect on lignin structures, delignification yields and cellulose-to-glucose conversion. Bioresource Technology, 112, 156-163. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.080.
  47. Oliva, J. M., & Ballesteros, M. (2008). Realistic approach for full-scale bioethanol production from lignocellulose : a review (Vol. 67, pp. 874-884).
  48. Payne, C. E., & Wolfrum, E. J. (2015). Rapid analysis of composition and reactivity in cellulosic biomass feedstocks with near-infrared spectroscopy. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 8(1), 1-14. http://www.biotechnologyforbiofuels.com/content/8/1/43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-014-0179-6
  49. Pointner, et al. (2014). Composition of corncobs as a substrate for fermentation of biofuels. Agronomy Research, 12(2), 391-396.
  50. Puri, M., Abraham, R. E., & Barrow, C. J. (2012). Biofuel production: prospects, challenges and feedstock in Australia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(8), 6022-6031. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.06.025.
  51. Qureshi, A. S., Zhang, J., & Bao, J. (2015). Bioresource technology high ethanol fermentation performance of the dry dilute acid pretreated corn stover by an evolutionarily adapted saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Bioresource Technology, 189, 399-404. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.025.
  52. Roslan, A. M., Yee, P. L., Shah, U. K. M., Aziz, S. A., & Hassan, M. A. (2011). Production of bioethanol from rice straw using cellulase by local Aspergillus sp. International Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(2), 188-193. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijar.2011.188.193
  53. Saha, B. C., Iten, L. B., Cotta, M. A., & Victor Wu, Y. (2005). Dilute acid pretreatment, enzymatic saccharification and fermentation of wheat straw to ethanol. Process Biochemistry, 40(12), 3693-3700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.04.006
  54. Sahare Rajkumar, S., Seeta Laxman, R., & Mala, R. (2012). Effect of alkali pretreatment on the structural properties and enzymatic hydrolysis of corn cob (pp. 1806-1819).
  55. Satimanont, Sirikarn, Apanee Luengnaruemitchai, and Sujitra Wongkasemjit. 2012. "Effect of Temperature and Time on Dilute Acid Pretreatment of Corn Cobs." 66(4): 316-20.
  56. Scarlat, N., Dallemand, J.-f., Monforti-ferrario, F., & Nita, V. (2015). The role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: policies and facts. Environmental Development, 15, 3-34. doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.006.
  57. Schmidt Anette, S., & Anne Belinda, T. (1998). Optimization of wet oxidation pretreatment of wheat straw (Vol. 64, pp. 139-151). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(97)00164-8
  58. Shuang-Qi, T., & Chen, Z.-C. (2016). Com dynamic analysis of bioethanol production from corn stover and immobilized yeast. Bioresources, 11(3), 6040-6049.
  59. Singh, & Rakesh Kumar, T. (2013). Acid and alkaline pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass to produce ethanol as biofuel. International Journal of ChemTech Research, 5(2), 727-734.
  60. Singh, et al. (2015). Comparison of different biomass pretreatment techniques and their impact on chemistry and structure. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2(February), 1-12. http://www.frontiersin.org/Bioenergy_and_Biofuels/10.3389/fenrg.2014.00062/abstract.
  61. Uppugundla, N., et al. (2014). A comparative study of ethanol production using dilute acid, ionic liquid and $AFEX^{TM}$ pretreated corn stover. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 7(1), 72. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4050221&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-7-72
  62. Van Soest, P. J. (1963). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 46, 829-835.
  63. Vani, S., Sukumaran, R. K., & Savithri, S. (2015). Prediction of sugar yields during hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass using artificial neural network modeling. Bioresource Technology, 188, 128-135. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0960852415001030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.01.083
  64. Vincent, M. A. (2010). Sequential saccharification and fermentation of corn stover for the production of fuel ethanol using wood-rot fungi, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli K011. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 11403, 234.
  65. Xu, J., Wang, Z., Sharma-Shivappa, R. R., & Cheng, J. J. (2011). Enzymatic hydrolysis of switchgrass and coastal Bermuda grass pretreated using different chemical methods. BioResources, 6(3), 2990-3003.
  66. Xuejun, et al. (2004). Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-exploded Douglas fir wood by alkali-oxygen post-treatment. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 113, 1103-1114.
  67. Yu, H., et al. (2009). The effect of biological pretreatment with the selective white-rot fungus Echinodontium taxodii on enzymatic hydrolysis of softwoods and hardwoods. Bioresource Technology, 100(21), 5170-5175. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.05.049.
  68. Zhang, X. (2012). Pretreatment of corn stover of sugar production by using the combination of alkaline reagents and switchgrass-derived black liqour.
  69. Zhao, J., & Xia, L. (2009). Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of alkaline-pretreated corn stover to ethanol using a recombinant yeast strain. Fuel Processing Technology, 90(10), 1193-1197. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc. 2009.05.018.
  70. Zhu, J. Y., & Zhuang, X. S. (2012). Conceptual net energy output for biofuel production from lignocellulosic biomass through biorefining. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 38(4), 583-598. doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2012.03.007.

피인용 문헌

  1. A comparative evaluation of fermentable sugars production from oxidative, alkaline, alkaline peroxide oxidation, dilute acid, and molten hydrate salt pretreatments of corn cob biomass vol.9, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3934/energy.2021002
  2. The “Zero Miles Product” Concept Applied to Biofuel Production: A Case Study vol.14, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/en14030565