DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Achievements and Challenges of 40th Anniversary Health Insurance

건강보험 40년 성과와 과제

  • Lee, Kyu Sik (Department of Health Administration, Yonsei University College of Health Sciences)
  • 이규식 (연세대학교 보건과학대학 보건행정학과)
  • Received : 2017.06.02
  • Accepted : 2017.06.13
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

There have been many achievements for 40 years since the introduction of compulsory health insurance. Despite many achievements, it has many challenges in health insurance. Aging, non-communicable disease, and low growth economy are threatening the sustainability of health insurance, and it is time to reform the health insurance. A long-term reform plan will be an absolute necessity for reform of health insurance and health care system. Health insurance and health care reform should be an extremely revolutionary content that completely changes the framework. This reform should deal with the philosophy of health, approach of medical education and doctor training, changing supply of medical service, the innovation of primary medical care, reform of public health system, the management of medical utilization, the integration of medical cure and care services, enhancing the benefit coverage, prohibition of covered and non-covered services, etc. Therefore, it is urgent to form a consensus on the necessity of reform, to establish the health insurance plan on this consensus, and to make efforts to make health insurance sustainable.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee KS. Sustainable healthcare system for improving quality of life. 2016 Suggestions for Future. Seoul: National Assembly; 2016. pp. 475-504.
  2. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korean Institute for Health and Social Affaires. OECD health data 2015. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2015.
  3. Lee YJ, Park CW. A equity changes in health care utilization according to health status. Soc Welf Policy 2011;38(1):33-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 15855/swp.2011.38.1.33. https://doi.org/10.15855/swp.2011.38.1.33
  4. Kim DY. Analysis of changes to equality in health and medical service utilization by income levels. J Inst Soc Sci 2012;23(3):105-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16881/jss.2012.07.23.3.105.
  5. Lee KS. Development and reconsideration of Korea healthcare system. Health Policy Manag 2013;23(4):303-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4332/kjhpa.2013.23.4.303.
  6. World Health Organization. World health statistics. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
  7. McGinnis JM, Williams-Russo P, Knickman JR. The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21(2): 78-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.78.
  8. Boufford JI. Assuring the public's health in the 21'st century. The future of the public's health in the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 2003.
  9. Lee KS. Theory of health security. Seoul: Gyechuk Munwhasa; 2016.
  10. National Health Insurance Service. Main statistics of health insurance. Wonju: National Health Insurance Service; 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2013, 2015.
  11. Lee KS, Chung HS, Hwang SW, Choi DB, Choi BY, Kim HN, et al. Management strategy of elderly medical costs for aged society. Wonju: National Health Insurance Service; 2017.
  12. Kim NS, Park EJ, Chun JA, Hwang DK, Lee SH, Lee HY, et al. Analysis on healthcare service utilization and related institutions for promoting the appropriate use of healthcare services. Sejong: Korean Institute for Health and Social Affaires; 2015.
  13. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD health data. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2016.
  14. Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015 National health statistics. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2016.
  15. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Health at glance 2009. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2009.
  16. World Health Organization. The world health report 2000: health systems: improving performance. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
  17. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Health and social affaires. Sejong: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 1989.
  18. United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York (NY): United Nations General Assembly; 1948.
  19. Melhado EM. Economists, public provision, and the market: changing values in policy debate. J Health Polit Policy Law 1998;23(2):215-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-23-2-215.
  20. Lee KS. Public hospital and policy medicine. Issue Paper No. 7. Seoul: Korea Institute for Health and Welfare Policy; 2013.
  21. Niki R. Health economics and policy [Internet]. News Letter 2016;146:18-23 [cited 2017 May 20]. Available from: http://www.inhcc.org/jp/research/news/niki/20160901-niki-no146.html#toc1.
  22. Ettelt S, McKee M, Nolte E, Mays N, Thomson S. Planning health care capacity: whose responsibility? In: Rechel B, Wright S, Edwards N, Dowdeswell B, McKee M, editors. Investing in hospitals of the future. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, European Observatory on Health Care Systems and Policies; 2009. pp. 47-66.
  23. Beveridge WH. Social insurance and allied services. New York (NY): Agathon Press; 1969.
  24. Shin E, Lee KS et al. Management strategy of appropriate admission under new DRGs system. Wonju: Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service; 2016.
  25. House of Lords, Select Committee on the Long-term Sustainability of the NHS. The long-term sustainability of the NHS and adult social care. London: The House of Lords; 2017.