정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제21권3호
  • /
  • Pages.277-284
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

교육대학교 로봇 활용 소프트웨어 교육 과정 개발을 위한 예비 교사의 인식 조사 연구

Study on the Preliminary Teachers' Perception for the Development of Curriculum of the Robot-based Software Education in the Universities of Education

  • 정인기 (춘천교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Jeong, Inkee (Dept. of Computer Education, ChunCheon National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2017.03.30
  • 심사 : 2017.04.12
  • 발행 : 2017.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

2018학년도부터 초 중 고등학교에서 소프트웨어 교육이 시행될 예정이다. 소프트웨어 교육의 목표는 학생들에게 Computational Thinking 능력을 길러주는 데 있다고 할 수 있다. 특히, 소프트웨어 교육을 할 때 로봇을 활용하면 학생들의 흥미도가 높아지고, 창의성을 증대시키는데 도움이 된다. 이러한 로봇을 활용한 소프트웨어 교육이 효과적으로 실시되려면 교사에 대한 교육이 효과적으로 이루어져야 한다. 예비 교사들을 위한 효과적인 교육 내용의 개발은 소프트웨어 교육의 성공과 연결되어 있다고 할 수 있다. 그런데 효과적인 교육은 교육 대상을 정확하게 분석하는데서 시작된다고 할 수 있다. 즉, 예비 교사를 위한 효과적인 교육과정을 개발하기 위해서는 로봇 활용 소프트웨어 교육을 실시하게 될 예비 교사들의 수준을 파악할 필요가 있는 것이다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 로봇을 활용한 소프트웨어 교육 과정 개발에 도움을 줄 수 있는 예비 교사들의 경험, 수준 및 인식에 대하여 설문 조사하였다.

Software Education will be implemented at elementary, middle and high schools starting in 2018. The goal of software education is to help students develop Computational thinking skills. Especially, using robots in software education increases student interest and helps to increase creativity. In order for software education using robots to be effective, education for teachers should be effective. The development of effective education contents for preliminary teachers can be said to be the success of software education. By the way, effective education can be said to begin with an accurate analysis of the subjects. In order to develop an effective curriculum for preliminary teachers, it is necessary to grasp the level of preliminary teachers who will carry out the software education using robots. Therefore, in this paper, we surveyed the experiences, levels and perceptions of preliminary teachers to help develop software education curriculum using robots.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bartneck, C..Nomura, T..Kanda, T..Suzuki, T..Kato, K. (2005). Cultural differences in attitudes towards robots. Companions: Hard Problems and Open Challenges in Robot-Human Interaction, 1.
  2. Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the Educational Potential of Robotics in Schools : A Systematic Review. Computer & Education. 58(3). 978-988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.006
  3. Changmo Yang (2014). Comparison of the Effects of Robotics Education to Programming Education Using Meta-Analysis. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 18(3). 413-422. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.3.413
  4. Chul Kim (2012). Analysis of Domestic Research Trend and Educational Effect in Relation to Robot Education. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 16(2). 233-243.
  5. Chul Kim (2014). A Study on Contents of Robot Education Curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 18(3). 443-452. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.3.443
  6. Disessa, A. (2000). Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
  7. EunKyoung Lee.YoungJun Lee (2008). The Effects of a Robot Based Programming Learning on Learners' Creative Problem Solving Potential. Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Educations. 33(2). 120-136.
  8. Feng. H. C..Lin, C, H..Liu, E.Z.F (2011). Parents' Perceptions of Educational Programmable Bricks for Kids, British Journal of Educational Technology. 42(2). 30-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01158.x
  9. Jeeun Baek.Kyunghyun Kim (2015). The Effects of a Long Term Robot Based Instruction on the Creativity of Elementary Students. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 19(1). 45-56. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.1.45
  10. Jung-Ho Park.Chul Kim (2014). A Study on the Curriculum for Elementary and Middle School in Robot and Convergence Activity. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 18(2). 285-294. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.2.285
  11. Kay, A. (1991). Computers, Networks and Education. issue of Scientific American Magazine, September, 138-148.
  12. Ki-Cheon Hong.Jae-Kuk Shim (2013). A Study of STEAM Education for Elementary Science Subject with Robots. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 17(1). 83-91.
  13. Kim, S. W..Lee, Y. (2015). A Survey on Elementary School Teachers' Attitude toward Robot. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, 2015(1), 1802-1807.
  14. Lindh, J..Holgersson, T. (2007). Does Lego Training Stimulate Pupils' Ability to Solve Logical Problems?, Computers & Education. 49. 1097-1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.12.008
  15. Lough, T..Fett, C. (2004). "Trends in Robotics Education : How Teacher Observations of Male and Female Robotics Students are Changing Over Time," TIES Magazine, 22-33.
  16. Miller, D. P..Nourbakhsh, I. R..Sigwart, R. (2008). "Robots for Education". New York. NY:Springer-Verlag. 1283-1301.
  17. Namin Shin.Sanga Kim (2009). Korean Students'Attitudes Towards Robots: Two Survey Studies. Journal of Korea Robotics Society. 4(1). 10-16.
  18. Nomura, T..Kanda, T..Suzuki, T..Han, J..Shin, N..Burke, J..Kato, K. (2007). Implications on humanoid robots in pedagogical applications from cross-cultural analysis between Japan, Korea, and the USA. In RO-MAN 2007-The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 1052-1057). IEEE.
  19. Papert, S..Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  20. Resnick, M. (2007). Sowing the Seeds for a More Creative Society. Learning & Leading with Technology. 18-22.
  21. Ringwood, J. V..Monaghan, K..Maloco, J. (2005). Teaching engineering design through Lego Mindstorms. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790310001658587
  22. Seong-Won Kim.Youngjun Lee (2016). The Effects of Robot Programming on the Attitudes toward Robot of Pre-service Teachers'. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education. 19(6). 91-103.
  23. Soophung Chai.Seokju Chun (2015). The Effects of STEAM-based Programming Education with Robot on Creativity and Character of Elementary School Students. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 19(2). 159-166. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.2.159
  24. Younghoon Sung (2015). The Effects of STEAM-based Storytelling Robotics Education on Learning Attitudes of Elementary School Girls. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education. 19(1). 87-98. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.1.87
  25. YoungJun Lee.EnuKyoung Lee (2009). An Algorithm Learning Program with Robot. The Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education. 12(1). 33-44.

피인용 문헌

  1. 초등 소프트웨어 교육 연구 동향 분석: 국내 학술지 중심으로 vol.21, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.5.509
  2. 초등 예비교사의 소프트웨어 교육 관련 경험과 이해도 분석 vol.22, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2018.22.1.81
  3. 문제해결학습을 적용한 소프트웨어 교육 효과 분석 vol.16, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2018.16.3.095
  4. SW교육 강화를 위한 교육대학교의 교육과정 개선 요구 분석 vol.23, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.1.1
  5. 초등예비교원의 SW교육에 대한 인식, 경험의 질적 탐구 vol.23, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.1.39
  6. 로봇 활용 SW 교육에서 활동 및 학습 내용에 따른 학습자 흥미: 햄스터 로봇을 중심으로 vol.23, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.1.85
  7. 예비교원 컴퓨팅 사고 이해도 분석을 통한 소프트웨어 교육 역량 강화 방안 vol.24, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.1.29
  8. 초등교원양성 기관의 SW 교육 시수 분석 : SWEET 사업의 영향을 중심으로 vol.24, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2020.24.2.147
  9. 로봇활용교육에 대한 교사들의 테크놀로지내용교수지식 분석 vol.21, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5762/kais.2020.21.6.196