Phonetics and Speech Sciences (말소리와 음성과학)

Korean Society of Speech Sciences (한국음성학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The impact of language-learning environments on Korean learners' English vowel production

  • Lee, Shinsook (Department of English Language Education Korea University) ;
  • Nam, Hosung (Korea University) ;
  • Kang, Jaekoo (Department of Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences The CUNY Graduate Center, CUNY) ;
  • Shin, Dong-Jin (Center for Spoken Language Research(CSLR) Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) ;
  • Kim, Young Shin (University College London)
  • Received : 2017.05.14
  • Accepted : 2017.06.27
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The current study investigated whether Korean learners' English-learning environments, especially target English accent (General American English (GAE) vs. Southern British English (SBE)) and English-language experience affected their production of English vowels. Thirty six EFL learners, 27 ESL-US learners, and 33 ESL-UK learners produced 8 English vowels with a bVt frame (beat, bit, bet, bat, bought, bot, boat, boot). The learners' productions were acoustically analyzed in terms of F1 and F2 frequencies. The overall results revealed that the learners' target accent had an effect on their production of some English vowels. The EFL and ESL-US learners' (especially, female learners') production of bought, bot, boat, and boot, which show characteristic differences between the GAE and SBE accents, was closer to that of the native American English (AE) speakers than the native British English (BE) speakers. In contrast, the ESL-UK learners' production of bought and bot demonstrated the opposite pattern. Thus, the impact of target accent was not demonstrated across the board. The effect of the learners' different English-language experience was also rather limited. This was because the EFL learners' production was not much different from the ESL-US learners' production, in spite of the ESL-US learners' residence in the US for more than 9 years. Furthermore, the Korean learners, irrespective of their different English-language experience, tended to produce bit and bat with lower F1 than the native AE and BE speakers, thus resulting in bit and bat to be produced similarly to beat and bet, respectively. This demonstrates the learners' persistent L1 effects on their English vowel production despite the learners' residence in the English speaking countries or their high English proficiency.

Keywords

References

  1. Baker, W., Trofimovich, P., Mack, M., & Flege, J. E. (2002). The effect of perceived phonetic similarity on nonnative sound learning by children and adults. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development. Somerville, MA.
  2. Birdsong, D. (2007). Nativelike pronunciation among late learners of French as a second language. In O.-S. Bohn & M. Munro (Eds.), Language Experience in Second Language Speech Learning: In Honor of James E. Flege (pp. 99-116). John Benjamins: Amsterdam.
  3. Bohn, O. -S. & Flege, J. E. (1992). The production of new and similar vowels by adult German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, 131-158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010792
  4. Bongaerts, T., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1995). Can late learners attain a native accent in a foreign language? A test of the critical period hypothesis. In D. Singleton & Z. Lengyel (Eds.), The Age Factor in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 30-50). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  5. Bongaerts, T., Van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447-465.
  6. Buck, G. (2001). Assessing Listening. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D., & Goodwin, J. (2010). Teaching Pronunciation: A Course Book and Reference Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Clopper, C. G., & Pisoni, D. B. (2004). Some acoustic cues for perceptual categorization of American English regional dialects. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 111-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(03)00009-3
  9. Clopper, C. G., Pisoni, D. B., & de Jong, K. (2005). Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 1661-1676. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2000774
  10. DiCanio, C., Nam, H., Amith, J. D., García, R. C., & Whalen, D. H. (2015). Vowel variability in elicited versus spontaneous speech: Evidence from Mixtec. Journal of Phonetics, 48, 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.10.003
  11. Escudero, P., & Boersma, P. (2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 551-585.
  12. Evans, B. G., & Iverson, P. (2004). Vowel normalization for accent: An investigation of best exemplar locations in northern and southern British English sentences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 352-361. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1635413
  13. Evans, B. G., & Iverson, P. (2007). Plasticity in vowel perception and production: A study of accent in young adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121, 3814-3826. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2722209
  14. Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research (pp. 233-272). Timonium, MD: York Press.
  15. Flege, J. E., Bohn, O. -S., & Jang, S. (1997). Effects of experience on non-native speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437-470. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0052
  16. Flege, J. E., MacKay, I., & Meador, D. (1999). Native Italian speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 2973-2987. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.428116
  17. Flege, J. E., Mackay, I., & Piske, T. (2002). Assessing bilingual dominance. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23, 567-598.
  18. Fullana, R. N., & MacKay, I. (2002). A study of foreign accent in Spanish and Catalan speakers' production of English words: Preliminary evidence. In J. Diaz García (Ed.), Actus del II Congreso de Fonetica Experimental (pp. 198-203). Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.
  19. Hansen Edwards, J. (2008). Social factors and variation in production in L2 phonology. In J. Hansen Edwards & M. Zampini (Eds.), Phonology and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 251-279). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  20. Hwang, I., & Lee, S. (2012). Perception of English vowel categories by Korean university students. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 37(4), 1095-1117. https://doi.org/10.18855/lisoko.2012.37.4.014
  21. Ingram, J., & Park, S. (1997). Cross-language vowel perception and production by Japanese and Korean learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 343-370. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1997.0048
  22. Jenkins, J. (2007). English as a Lingua Franca: Attitude and Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  23. Labov, W. (1998). The three dialects of English. In M. D. Linn (Ed.), Handbook of Dialects and Language Variation (pp. 39-81). San Diego: Academic Press.
  24. Labov, W. (2005). The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
  25. Ladefoged, P. (2006). A Course in Phonetics (5th edition). Boston: Thomson Wadsworth.
  26. Lee, S., & Shin, D. (2015). Estimating Korean EFL listeners' perception of English vowels with reference to cross-language labelling. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 21(2), 297-321. https://doi.org/10.17959/sppm.2015.21.2.297
  27. Munro, M. (1993). Productions of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech, 36 (1), 39-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099303600103
  28. Strange, W., Akahane-Yamada, R., Kudo, R., Trent, S. A., Nishi, K., & Jenkins, J. J. (1998). Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by Japanese listeners. Journal of Phonetics, 26, 311-344. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1998.0078
  29. Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Williams, A., & Kerswill, P. (1999). Dialect leveling: Change and continuity in Milton Keynes, Reading and Hull. In P. Foulkes & G. J. Docherty (Eds.), Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles (pp. 141-162). London: Arnold.
  31. Yang, B. (1996). A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 245-261. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.1996.0013