DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Time-domain hydroelastic analysis with efficient load estimation for random waves

  • Kang, H.Y. (Department of Ocean Engineering, Texas A&M University) ;
  • Kim, M.H. (Department of Ocean Engineering, Texas A&M University)
  • Received : 2016.01.24
  • Accepted : 2016.09.14
  • Published : 2017.05.31

Abstract

Hydroelastic interactions of a deformable floating body with random waves are investigated in time domain. Both hydroelastic motion and structural dynamics are solved by expansion of elastic modes and Fourier transform for the random waves. A direct and efficient structural analysis in time domain is developed. In particular, an efficient way of obtaining distributive loads for the hydrodynamic integral terms including convolution integral by using Fubini theory is explained. After confirming correctness of respective loading components, calculations of full distributions of loads in random waves are expedited by reformulating all the body loading terms into distributed forms. The method is validated by extensive convergence tests and comparisons against the counterparts of the frequency-domain analysis. Characteristics of motion/deformation responses and stress resultants are investigated through a parametric study with varying bending rigidity and types of random waves. Relative contributions of componential loads are identified. The consequence of elastic-mode resonance is underscored.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, Y., Kim, M., 2014. Coupled dynamic analysis of multiple wind turbines on a large single floater. Ocean Eng. 92, 175-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2014.10.001
  2. Chen, X.-j., Wu, Y.-s., Cui, W.-c., Jensen, J.J., 2006. Review of hydroelasticity theories for global response of marine structures. Ocean Eng. 33(3), 439-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.04.010
  3. Chen, X.J., Wu, Y.S., Cui, W.C., Tang, X.F., 2003. Nonlinear hydroelastic analysis of a moored floating body. Ocean Eng. 30(8), 965-1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-8018(02)00078-1
  4. Cho, I.H., Kim, M.H., Kweon, H.M., 2012. Wave energy converter by using relative heave motion between buoy and inner dynamic system. Ocean Syst. Eng. 2(4), 297-314. https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2012.2.4.297
  5. Cummins,W., 1962. The Impulse Response Function and Ship Motions. David Taylor Model Basin, Washington DC.
  6. Hamamoto, T., Suzuki, A., Tsujioka, N., Fujita, K.-i., 1998. 3D BEM-FEM hybrid hydroelastic analysis of module linked large floating structures subjected to regular waves. In: The Eighth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  7. Iijima, K., Yao, T., Moan, T., 2008. Structural response of a ship in severe seas considering global hydroelastic vibrations. Mar. Struct. 21(4), 420-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2008.03.003
  8. Kang, H.Y., 2014. Hydroelastic Analysis Coupled with Nonlinear Mooringrisers for a Moored Deformable Floating Body and Development of Dynamic Positioning System for High Accuracy. Ph.D.. Texas A&M University.
  9. Kang, H.Y., Kim, M.H., 2014. Hydroelastic analysis and statistical assessment of flexible offshore platforms. Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng. 24(1), 35-44.
  10. Kashiwagi, M., 1998a. A B-spline Galerkin scheme for calculating the hydroelastic response of a very large floating structure in waves. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 3(1), 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01239805
  11. Kashiwagi, M., 1998b. A direct method versus a mode-expansion method for calculating hydroelastic response of a VLFS in waves. In: The Eighth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  12. Kashiwagi, M., 2000. Research on hydroelastic responses of VLFS: recent progress and future work. Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng. 10(2), 81-90.
  13. Kim, B.W., Hong, S.Y., Kyoung, J.H., Cho, S.K., 2007. Evaluation of bending moments and shear forces at unit connections of very large floating structures using hydroelastic and rigid body analyses. Ocean Eng. 34(11-12), 1668-1679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2006.10.018
  14. Kim, J.H., Kim, Y., Yuck, R.H., Lee, D.Y., 2015. Comparison of slamming and whipping loads by fully coupled hydroelastic analysis and experimental measurement. J. Fluids Struct. 52, 145-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.10.011
  15. Kim, Y., Kim, K.H., Kim, Y., 2009a. Analysis of hydroelasticity of floating shiplike structure in time domain using a fully coupled hybrid BEM-FEM. J. Ship Res. 53(1), 31-47.
  16. Kim, Y., Kim, K.H., Kim, Y., 2009b. Springing analysis of a seagoing vessel using fully coupled BEM-FEM in the time domain. Ocean Eng. 36(11), 785-796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2009.04.002
  17. Kim, Y., Kim, K.H., Kim, Y., 2009c. Time domain springing analysis on a floating barge under oblique wave. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 14(4), 451-468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-009-0068-z
  18. Kyoung, J.H., Hong, S.Y., Kim, B.W., 2006. FEM for time domain analysis of hydroelastic response of VLFS with fully nonlinear free-surface conditions. Int. J. Offshore Polar Eng. 16(3), 168-174.
  19. Lee, D. H. and H. S. Choi(2003). Transient hydroelastic response of very large floating structures by FE-BE hybrid method. The Thirteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
  20. Leissa, A.W., 1962. A method for analyzing the vibration of plates. J. Aerosp. Sci. 29(4), 475-475.
  21. Liu, X.D., Sakai, S., 2002. Time domain analysis on the dynamic response of a flexible floating structure to waves. J. Eng. Mechanics-Asce 128(1), 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2002)128:1(48)
  22. Liuchao, Q.C., Hua, L., 2007. Three-dimensional time-domain analysis of very large floating structures subjected to unsteady external loading. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. Trans. Asme 129(1), 21-28. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2355511
  23. Malenica, S., De Hauteclocque, G., 2012. Second order hydroelastic response of the vertical circular cylinder to monochromaticwaterwaves. In: International Workshop on Water Waves and Floating Bodies, Copenhague, Denmark.
  24. Marino, E., Borri, C., Lugni, C., 2011. Influence of wind-waves energy transfer on the impulsive hydrodynamic loads acting on offshore wind turbines. J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodyn 99(6-7), 767-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2011.03.008
  25. Marino, E., Lugni, C., Borri, C., 2013. The role of the nonlinear wave kinematics on the global responses of an OWT in parked and operating conditions. J. Wind Eng. Industrial Aerodyn 123, 363-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jweia.2013.09.003
  26. Marino, E., Nguyen, H., Lugni, C., Manuel, L., Borri, C., 2015. Irregular nonlinear wave simulation and associated loads on offshore wind turbines. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. Trans. Asme 137(2).
  27. Neal, E., 1974. Second order hydrodynamic forces due to stochastic excitation. In: Tenth Naval Hydrodynamics Symposium.
  28. Newman, J.N., 1994.Wave effects on deformable-bodies. Appl. Ocean Res. 16(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-1187(94)90013-2
  29. Ogilvie, T.F., 1964. Recent progress toward the understanding and prediction of ship motions. In: The Fifth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Bergen, Norway.
  30. Ran, Z., 2000. Coupled Dynamic Analysis of Floating Structures inWaves and Currents. Ph.D. Dissertation. Texas A&M University.
  31. Senjanovic, I., Malenica, S., Tomasevic, S., 2009. Hydroelasticity of large container ships. Mar. Struct. 22(2), 287-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2008.04.002
  32. Stewart, J., 2009. Calculus. Brooks/Cole, Stamford, Connecticut.
  33. Taghipour, R., Perez, T., Moan, T., 2009. Time-domain hydroelastic analysis of a flexible marine structure using state-space models. J. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. Trans. Asme 131(1).
  34. Watanabe, E., Utsunomiya, T., Wang, C.M., 2004. Hydroelastic analysis of pontoon-type VLFS: a literature survey. Eng. Struct. 26(2), 245-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.10.001

Cited by

  1. A time-domain method for hydroelasticity of very large floating structures in inhomogeneous sea conditions vol.57, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2017.10.008
  2. Experimental study on responses of an 8-module VLFS considering different encounter wave conditions vol.78, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2021.102959
  3. Offshore Structural Reliability Assessment by Probabilistic Procedures-A Review vol.9, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9090998