DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

닭 농장 HACCP 심사항목의 적부판정 향상을 위한 차등 점수 설정에 관한 연구

A Study on The Setting of Differentiate the Score to Improve the Proper and Non-proper Judgement of HACCP Evaluation Items of Poultry Farm

  • 남인식 (한경대학교 고품질친환경축산물생산기술연구센터)
  • Received : 2017.03.07
  • Accepted : 2017.04.05
  • Published : 2017.05.31

Abstract

본 연구는 안전한 육계 및 계란 생산에 기반이 되는 닭 농장의 HACCP 심사의 객관성을 높이기 위하여 현행 심사항목 점수부여 체계의 문제점에 대한 개선방안을 도출하기 위한 목적으로 실시하였다. 기존 닭 농장 HACCP심사항목은 중요도 수준의 구분 없이 동일한 점수(5점)를 부여하고 있으나 본 연구에서는 최근 3년간 지적비율, 위해의 심각도 수준 등을 고려하여 심사항목별로 중요도 수준을 도출하였고 그 결과에 따라 심사항목의 점수를 차등 부여하도록 하였다. 닭 농장의 선행요건 분야 심사항목(60개)은 중요도에 따라 최대 5점에서 최소 2점의 점수체계를 구축하여 총 점수가 200점이 되도록 하였으며, HACCP 관리 분야 심사항목(15개)은 최대 10점에서 최소 5점 체계를 구축하여 총 점수가 100점이 되도록 개발하였다. 본 연구결과를 현장에 적용할 경우 심사의 객관성을 높여 더욱 안전하고 위생적인 육계 및 계란 생산이 가능할 것으로 예상된다. 이는 나아가 닭 농장 HACCP 제도의 활성화와 소비자에게 보다 안전한 축산물을 공급할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

This study was conducted to improve correct judgement of HACCP evaluation items in poultry farm. The importance levels and score of each HACCP evaluation item was derived through the non-compliance rate and severity levels of hazard. The total score of HACCP evaluation items of the pre-requisite management section was 200 points and the HACCP management section was developed to have a total of 100 points. Implementation of the result of this study to poultry farm may help to produce safer and hygienic chicken and egg production. For a more objective assessment, detailed criteria should be developed according to the score of each HACCP evaluation item.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, C. E. 1994. HACCP as applied in the USA. Food Control 5: 187-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7135(94)90081-7
  2. Codex Alimentarius Commission. 2001. Food hygiene basic programs. 3rd. Bernan Association. Lanham, MD.
  3. Hong J. H. and S. M. Lee. 2011. Suggestions for a HACCP system assessment in livestock product processing plants. Korean J. Vet. Serv. 34: 441-448. https://doi.org/10.7853/kjvs.2011.34.4.441
  4. KFDA. 2015. Food and livestock products HACCP Evaluation standard (Notice number 2015-73). Korea Food and Drug Safety Agency. Osong.
  5. KFDA. 2016. Food and livestock products HACCP Evaluation standard (Notice number 2016-30). Korea Food and Drug Safety Agency. Osong.
  6. KOLPHAS. 2016. Statistics of HACCP implementation on animal farms. Korea Livestock Products HACCP Accreditation Service. Anyang.
  7. Lee, G. Y., J. Y. Lee, S. H. Back, I. J. Hwang, K. S. Lee, Y. S. Kim, B. H. Kim, H. S. Kim, S. C. Kang, J. J. Cho, M. S. Park, H. J. Suk, and I. S. Nam. 2011. Study on the management level of pathogenic bacteria in HACCP system implemented animal farm. J. Anim. Sci. and Tech. 53: 67-74. https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2011.53.1.67
  8. MAFRA. 1997. Livestock products sanitary control act. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Sejong.
  9. MAFRA. 2009. Feed control act. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Sejong.
  10. MAFRA. 2016. HACCP evaluation standard of feed factory (Notice number 2016-148). Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Sejong.
  11. Nam, I. S., H. S. Kim, K. M. Seo, and J. H. Ahn. 2014. Analysis of HACCP system implementation on productivity, advantage and disadvantage of laying han farm in Korea. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 41: 93-98. https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2014.41.2.93
  12. Nam, I. S., Y. H. Kim, B. M. Heo, S. G. Ji, S. J. Ko, J. W. Yoo, and S. M. Hang. 2015. A provision of evaluation standard for correct judgement of Livestock Products HACCP evaluation article. Korea Food and Drug Aafety Agency. Osong.
  13. Unnevehr, L. J. and H. H. Jensen. 1996. HACCP as regulatory innovation to improve food safety in the meat industry. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 78: 764-769. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243301
  14. USDA. 2014. Good agriculture practices good handling practices audit verification checklist. Version 1.2. United States Department of Agriculture. Washington.