Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2017.25.2.431

A Study on The Setting of Differentiate the Score to Improve the Proper and Non-proper Judgement of HACCP Evaluation Items of Poultry Farm  

Nam, In Sik (한경대학교 고품질친환경축산물생산기술연구센터)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture / v.25, no.2, 2017 , pp. 431-443 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to improve correct judgement of HACCP evaluation items in poultry farm. The importance levels and score of each HACCP evaluation item was derived through the non-compliance rate and severity levels of hazard. The total score of HACCP evaluation items of the pre-requisite management section was 200 points and the HACCP management section was developed to have a total of 100 points. Implementation of the result of this study to poultry farm may help to produce safer and hygienic chicken and egg production. For a more objective assessment, detailed criteria should be developed according to the score of each HACCP evaluation item.
Keywords
HACCP; evaluation items; differential score; poultry farm;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 MAFRA. 2009. Feed control act. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Sejong.
2 MAFRA. 2016. HACCP evaluation standard of feed factory (Notice number 2016-148). Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Sejong.
3 Nam, I. S., H. S. Kim, K. M. Seo, and J. H. Ahn. 2014. Analysis of HACCP system implementation on productivity, advantage and disadvantage of laying han farm in Korea. Korean J. Poult. Sci. 41: 93-98.   DOI
4 Nam, I. S., Y. H. Kim, B. M. Heo, S. G. Ji, S. J. Ko, J. W. Yoo, and S. M. Hang. 2015. A provision of evaluation standard for correct judgement of Livestock Products HACCP evaluation article. Korea Food and Drug Aafety Agency. Osong.
5 Unnevehr, L. J. and H. H. Jensen. 1996. HACCP as regulatory innovation to improve food safety in the meat industry. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 78: 764-769.   DOI
6 USDA. 2014. Good agriculture practices good handling practices audit verification checklist. Version 1.2. United States Department of Agriculture. Washington.
7 KFDA. 2015. Food and livestock products HACCP Evaluation standard (Notice number 2015-73). Korea Food and Drug Safety Agency. Osong.
8 Adams, C. E. 1994. HACCP as applied in the USA. Food Control 5: 187-189.   DOI
9 Codex Alimentarius Commission. 2001. Food hygiene basic programs. 3rd. Bernan Association. Lanham, MD.
10 Hong J. H. and S. M. Lee. 2011. Suggestions for a HACCP system assessment in livestock product processing plants. Korean J. Vet. Serv. 34: 441-448.   DOI
11 MAFRA. 1997. Livestock products sanitary control act. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Sejong.
12 KFDA. 2016. Food and livestock products HACCP Evaluation standard (Notice number 2016-30). Korea Food and Drug Safety Agency. Osong.
13 KOLPHAS. 2016. Statistics of HACCP implementation on animal farms. Korea Livestock Products HACCP Accreditation Service. Anyang.
14 Lee, G. Y., J. Y. Lee, S. H. Back, I. J. Hwang, K. S. Lee, Y. S. Kim, B. H. Kim, H. S. Kim, S. C. Kang, J. J. Cho, M. S. Park, H. J. Suk, and I. S. Nam. 2011. Study on the management level of pathogenic bacteria in HACCP system implemented animal farm. J. Anim. Sci. and Tech. 53: 67-74.   DOI