DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

How can the development of neighbourhood renewal strategies in Malaysia be informed by best practice and transferable lessons from developed countries

선진국 도시재생 사례비교를 통한 말레이시아 주거재생 전략의 모색

  • Tin, Wan Jiun (Urban Design and Development Engineering, Kyungsung University) ;
  • Lee, Seok-Hwan (Urban Design and Development Engineering, Kyungsung University)
  • 틴완준 (경성대학교 대학원 건설환경도시공학) ;
  • 이석환 (경성대학교 건설환경도시공학부 도시공학전공)
  • Received : 2017.01.13
  • Accepted : 2017.04.07
  • Published : 2017.04.30

Abstract

Economy-based urban redevelopment is the main priority in Malaysia, but has resulted in social problems such as gentrification, loss of heritage and identity, inequity, etc. Hence, it is crucial for the government to seek other alternatives rather than being solely reliant on urban redevelopment. Neighborhood renewal is a strategy involving the integration of redevelopment, rehabilitation, revitalization and preservation that aims to improve deprived areas using a more holistic approach. The aim of this paper is to review the neighborhood renewal policies in developed countries and to identify those elements that can be adopted in Malaysia. This study is conducted via a literature review. It was found that neighborhood renewal which integrates people-based, place-based and system-based policies highlights the importance of diversity, thereby aiming for resource optimization, community engagement and urban governance with the focal point of the fair, equity and systematic provision of resources. This paper concluded that neighborhood renewal in Malaysia should be initiated by locals with an emphasis on real local participation and a sustainable funding system. The government and local authorities should be observers rather than implementers.

말레이시아에서는 전면개발방식의 도시 재개발이 주로 이루어지고 있다. 그 결과 젠트리피케이션, 역사성과 정체성의 상실, 불평등 등과 같은 사회적 문제를 야기했다. 따라서 앞으로의 말레이시아 정부는 도시 재개발에만 의존하는 것 에서 벗어나 또 다른 대안을 모색하는 것이 매우 중요하다. 지역 기반 주거재생은 낙후 지역을 총체적인 방법으로 개선하기 위하여 재개발, 회복, 재활성화 및 보전 등을 통합하는 전력이다. 본 연구 목적은 선진국 주거재생 사례를 비교 검토 하고 말레이시아에 적용 가능한 요소들을 도출하는 것이다. 이를 위해 본 연구는 문헌 검토를 통한 비교 분석을 수행하였다. 그 결과 사람중심 장소중심 체계중심의 정책을 통합하는 주거지 재생을 통해, 적절한 자원활용을 목적으로 하는 다양성의 중요성, 주민참여, 그리고 공평하고 공정하며 체계적으로 자원을 제공할 수 있도록 하는 도시 협치 등이 가능하다는 것을 발견했다. 결론적으로 말레이시아의 주거지재생은 진정한 지역 주민의 참여와 지속 가능한 재원조달 시스템을 기반으로 지역주민으로부터 시작되어야 할 것이다. 정부와 지자체는 실행자 역할을 하기 보다는 지원자 역할을 하여야 할 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Economic Planning Unit, "Eleventh Malaysia Plan 2016-2020 Anchoring Growth of People," Prime Minister's Department, Malaysia, 2015.
  2. B. Zhai, M. K. Ng, "Urban regeneration and social capital in China: a case study of the Drum Tower Muslim District in Xi'an," Cities, 35(2013) 14-25, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2013.05.003
  3. McDonald, Malys and Maliene, "Urban regeneration for sustainable communities: A case study," Ukio Technologinis ir Ekonominis Vystymas, 15:1, 49-59, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/1392-8619.2009.15.49-59
  4. L. Crowley, B. Balaram, N. Lee, "People or Place? Urban policy in the age of austerity," The Work Foundation, part of Lancaster University, 2012.
  5. F. Wassenberg, K. Dijken, "A practitioner's view on neighbourhood renewal - Issues, approaches and experiences in European cities The Hague," 2011.
  6. W.J. Tin, S.H. Lee, "Development of neighbourhood renewal strategies in Malaysia through best practice and transferable lessons from South Korea and England" in Proceedings of the 3rd International Mega-Conference on Green and Smart Technology (GST 2016), Jeju Island, South Korea, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14257/astl.2016.140.27
  7. Korea Planning Association, "Urban regeneration (Korean version)," pp. 294-231, 2015.
  8. The Korea Herald, "Living in the neighborhoods of a cosmopolis: A New Community Culture in Seoul," 2015. http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20150325000939
  9. Social Exclusion Unit, "A new commitment to neighbourhood renewal - National Strategy Action Plan," 2001.
  10. The Seoul Research Data Service. http://data.si.re.kr/node/615 (accessed on August 2016)
  11. Department for Communities and Local Government, "The English Indices of Deprivation 2015 Statistical Release," National Statistics, 2015.
  12. Yeung, W. Jean, Adam K. Cheung, "Living alone: One-person households in Asia," Demographic Research, 32(40), pp. 1099-1112, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.40
  13. Census and Statistics Department, "The profile of the population in one-person households in 2011," Hong Kong Monthly Digest of Statistics, 2013.
  14. Office for National Statistics. https://www.ons.gov.uk/ (accessed on January 2016).
  15. L.L. Thang, E. Lim, "Seniors living alone in Singapore," National Council of Social Service and Singapore Tote Board, 2012.
  16. Hong Kong Housing Authority, "Housing in figures." 2015.
  17. Department of statistics Singapore, "Population trends." 2015.
  18. Couch, Sykes, Bőrstinghaus, "Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency," Progress in Planning 75 (2011), 1-52, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2010.12.001
  19. Ministry of Land, Transportation and Maritime Affairs, "Guideline for neighbourhood urban regeneration (Korean version)." Architecture & Urban Research Centre, 2016.
  20. World Databank. http://databank.worldbank.org/ data/reports.aspx?source=2&country=MYS&series=&peri od= (accessed on January, 2016)
  21. Housing & Development Board, "HDB's Remaking Our Heartland: Rejuvenating of East Coast Area Taking Shape," http://www.hdb.gov.sg /cs/infoweb/press-releases /hdbs-remaking-our-heartland-rejuvenation-of-east-coastarea (accessed on Mac 2016).
  22. Y. M. Joo, "From Developmental Cities to Entrepreneurial Cities to Just Cities? Building More Just Urban Governance in Asia." in RC21 International Conference on "The Ideal City: between myth and reality. Representations, policies, contradictions and challenges for tomorrow's urban life, Urbino, 2015.
  23. Busan Metropolitan Government, "Sanbokdoro Renaissance Project." 2013.
  24. Y. S. Lee, and J. H. Park, "A local asset based regeneration process of Gamcheon Culture Village Busan," KIEAE Journal, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 111-120, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12813/kieae.2014.14.3.111
  25. C. Couch, M. Cocks, "The governance of urban shrinkage in the Liverpool City-Region, United Kingdom," Shrink Smart, 2011.
  26. ECHO, "Kensington - Is it in the road to success?" 2005. http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/ news/liverpool-news/kensington-road-success-3532208
  27. Department of statistics Singapore, "Key household income trends, 2015", 2015.
  28. Housing & Development Board, Remaking Our Heartland (ROH) Programmes - Batch 1 and 2. www.hdb.gov.sg/cs/infoweb/doc/press-release-roh (accessed on Mac 2016)
  29. Iris Tam, "Planning for varieties in urban renewal Hong Kong," in Conference on When Creative Industries Crossover with Cities, 2007.
  30. National Property Information Centre. http://napic.jpph.gov.my/portal/web/guest/key-statistics (accessed on August 2016).
  31. Urban regeneration in Malaysia: Issues and practices. http://www.nilaiharta.com.my/view/urbanregeneration-in-malaysia-issues-and-practices (accessed on January 2016).
  32. Daily News & Analysis, "Little India in Malaysia preps up ahead of PM Modi's visit," 2015. http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-little-india-in-mala ysia-preps-up-ahead-of-pm-modi-s-visit-2146889
  33. People's Daily Online, "Kuala Lumpur's Chinatown preserved as tourist attraction: Mahathir," 2003. http://en.people.cn/200308/31/eng20030831_123443.shtml
  34. Heritage: Sungai Buloh Settlement. http://happygokl.com/heritage-sungai-buloh-leprosy-settlement/ (accessed on August 2016).
  35. Thinkcity, http://thinkcity.com.my/ (accessed on June 2016).