Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction (대한건축학회논문집:구조계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic Performance Evaluation of Steel Ordinary Moment Resisting Frames with Various Heights

다양한 높이를 갖는 철골 보통모멘트골조의 내진성능평가

  • 백성진 (한양대학교 일반대학원 건축공학과) ;
  • 김태오 (한양대학교 일반대학원 건축공학과) ;
  • 한상환 (한양대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2016.09.21
  • Accepted : 2017.05.08
  • Published : 2017.05.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Steel ordinary moment frame(steel OMF) has been used as a seismic force resisting system in regions of low and moderate seismicity. In this study, the seismic performance of the steel OMFs with various heights in SDC $C_{max}$ was evaluated. For this purpose, nine steel OMFs were designed according to seismic design codes(ASCE/SEI 7-10, ANSI/AISC 341-10), and the collapse probability of these steel OMFs were estimated using FEMA P-695. The collapse probability of steel OMFs became larger with an increase in the height of frames. Some of steel OMFs designed according to current design codes did not satisfy the acceptance criteria specified in FEMA P-695.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국과학재단

References

  1. AISC. (2010). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings (ANSI/AISC 341-10), American Institute of Steel Construction Inc., Chicago, IL.
  2. AISC. (2010). Specification for structural steel buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-10), American Institute of Steel Construction Inc., Chicago, IL.
  3. ASCE. (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures (ASCE/SEI 7-10), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
  4. ASCE. (2013). Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-13), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
  5. PEER/ATC. (2010). Modeling and acceptance critieria for seismic design and analysis of tall buildings (PEER/ATC 72-1), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center/Ap plied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
  6. Elkady, A., & Lignos, D. G. (2015). Effect of gravity framing on the overstrength and collapse capacity of steel frame buildings with perimeter special moment frames, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 44(8), 1289-1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2519
  7. FEMA. (2000). State of the art report on Connection Performance, (FEMA 355D), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  8. FEMA. (2009). Quantification of building seismic performance factors, (FEMA P-695), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  9. Flores, F. X., Carney, F. A., & Lopez-Garcia, D. (2014). Influence of the gravity framing system on the collapse performance of special steel moment frames, Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 101, 351-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.05.020
  10. Gupta, A., & Krawinkler, H. (1999). Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Rep. No. 132, Stanford University, CA.
  11. Han, S. W., Kwon, G. U., & Moon, K. H. (2007). Cyclic behavior of post-Northridge WUF-B connections, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 63(3), 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.05.003
  12. Lignos, D. G., & Krawinkler, H. (2011). Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 137(11), 1291-1302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376
  13. Lee, K. H., & Foutch, D. A. (2002). Performance evaluation of new steel frame buildings for seismic load, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 653-670. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.147
  14. McKenna, F. (1997). Object oriented finite element analysis: frameworks for analysis algorithms and parallel computing, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California at Berkeley.
  15. NIST. (2010). Evalution of the FEMA P-695 Methodology for Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors (NIST GCR 10-917-8), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
  16. Ricles, J. M., Mao, C., Lu, L. W., & Fisher, J. W. (2002). Inelastic cyclic testing of welded unreinforced moment connections, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 128(4), 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(429)
  17. Roeder, C. W., Schneider, S. P., & Carpenter, J. E. (1993). Seismic behavior of moment-resisting steel frames: Analytical study, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 119(6), 1866-1884. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:6(1866)
  18. Stojadinovic, B., Goel, S. C., Lee, K. H., Margarian, A. G., & Choi, J. H. (2000). Parametric tests on unreinforced steel moment connections, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 126(1), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:1(40)
  19. Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornel, C. A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  20. Yun, S. Y., Foutch, D. A., & Lee, K. (2000). Reliability and performance based design for seismic loads, PMC2000-311.
  21. Zareian, F., & Medina, R. A. (2010). A practical method of proper modeling of structural damping in inelastic plane structural systems, Computers and Structures, 88(1), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.08.001