DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Use of Noise Dampening Mats to Reduce Heavy-Equipment Noise Exposures in Construction

  • Saleh, Sabah (Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell) ;
  • Woskie, Susan (Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell) ;
  • Bello, Anila (Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell)
  • Received : 2016.05.11
  • Accepted : 2016.09.30
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

The performance of sound barriers was evaluated to determine their technical effectiveness and practicality in reducing noise exposures to operating engineers in construction. Commercially purchased sound dampening mats (SDMats) were installed inside three heavy-equipment engine compartments. Sound pressure levels (SPLs) were measured before and after installing the SDMats while the equipment was on idle and full-throttle settings where it normally operates. SPLs inside the heavy-equipment operator cabs were significantly reduced by 5.6-7.6 dBA on the full-throttle setting following installation of the SDMats (p < 0.01). The evaluated engineering control intervention was simple to install, affordable, and substantially reduced the engine noise reaching the heavy-equipment operator, potentially reducing reliance on hearing-protection devices to protect construction workers from noise exposures.

Keywords

References

  1. LaBenz P, Cohen A, Pearson B. A noise and hearing survey of earth-moving equipment operators. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1967;28:117-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028896709342495
  2. Kenney GD, Ayer HE. Noise exposure and hearing levels of workers in the sheet metal construction trade. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1975;36:626-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/0002889758507302
  3. Suter AH. Construction noise: exposure, effects, and the potential for remediation; a review and analysis. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 2002;63:768-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/15428110208984768
  4. Lusk SL, Hong OS, Ronis DL, Eakin BL, Kerr MJ, Early MR. Effectiveness of an intervention to increase construction workers' use of hearing protection. Hum Factors 1999;41:487-94. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872099779610969
  5. Neitzel R, Seixas NS, Camp J, Yost M. An assessment of occupational noise exposures in four construction trades. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1999;60:807-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028899908984506
  6. Seixas NS, Ren K, Neitzel R, Camp J, Yost M. Noise exposure among construction electricians. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 2001;62:615-21. https://doi.org/10.1202/0002-8894(2001)062<0615:NEACE>2.0.CO;2
  7. van Kempen EE, Kruize H, Boshuizen HC, Ameling CB, Staatsen BA, de Hollander AE. The association between noise exposure and blood pressure and ischemic heart disease: a meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect 2002;110:307-17. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.02110307
  8. Tomei G, Fioravanti M, Cerratti D, Sancini A, Tomao E, Rosati MV, Vacca D, Palitti T, Di Famiani M, Giubilati R, De Sio S, Tomei F. Occupational exposure to noise and the cardiovascular system: a meta-analysis. Sci Total Environ 2010;408:681-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.071
  9. Virkkunen H, Kauppinen T, Tenkanen L. Long-term effect of occupational noise on the risk of coronary heart disease. Scand J Work Environ Health 2005;31:291-9. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.885
  10. Davies HW, Teschke K, Kennedy SM, Hodgson MR, Hertzman C, Demers PA. Occupational exposure to noise and mortality from acute myocardial infarction. Epidemiology 2005;16:25-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ede.0000147121.13399.bf
  11. McClymont LG, Simpson DC. Noise levels and exposure patterns to do-it-yourself power tools. J Laryngol Otol 1989;103:1140-1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100111211
  12. Kerr MJ, Brosseau L, Johnson CS. Noise levels of selected construction tasks. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 2002;63:334-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15428110208984722
  13. Sinclair JDN, Haflidson WO. Construction noise in Ontario. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1995;10:457-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047322X.1995.10387637
  14. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Buy Quiet [Internet]. December 5, 2014 [cited 2016 Feb 22]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/buyquiet.
  15. Neitzel R, Seixas N. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers. J Occup Environ Hyg 2005;2:227-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620590932154
  16. Edelson J, Neitzel R, Meischke H, Daniell W, Sheppard L, Stover B, Seixas N. Predictors of hearing protection use in construction workers. Ann Occup Hyg 2009;53:605-15.
  17. Leensen MC, van Duivenbooden JC, Dreschler WA. A retrospective analysis of noise-induced hearing loss in the Dutch construction industry. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2011;84:577-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-010-0606-3
  18. Lusk SL, Kerr MJ, Kauffman SA. Use of hearing protection and perceptions of noise exposure and hearing loss among construction workers. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1998;59:466-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15428119891010217
  19. Dahm MM, Evans DE, Schubauer-Berigan MK, Birch ME, Deddens JA. Occupational exposure assessment in carbon nanotube and nanofiber primary and secondary manufacturers: mobile direct-reading sampling. Ann Occup Hyg 2013;57:328-44.
  20. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Preventing hazardous noise and hearing loss during project design and operation [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2016 Sep 20]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2016-101/.

Cited by

  1. Operating Engineers and the OSHA Silica Standard: A Survey of Union Trainers vol.29, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1048291119889006
  2. Revisão sistemática de intervenções para prevenção da perda auditiva induzida por ruído ocupacional - uma atualização vol.33, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202019189
  3. Advanced Real-Time Pollutant Monitoring Systems for Automatic Environmental Management of Construction Projects Focusing on Field Applicability vol.38, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000980